FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2516079105> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2516079105 endingPage "132" @default.
• W2516079105 startingPage "126" @default.
• W2516079105 abstract "Objectives: Researchers and clinicians consider thinking to be important in the development and maintenance of tinnitus distress, and altering thoughts or thinking style is an object of many forms of psychological therapy for tinnitus. Those working with people with tinnitus require a reliable, psychometrically robust means of measuring both positive and negative thinking related to it. The Tinnitus Cognitions Questionnaire (TCQ) was designed as such a measure and its authors showed it to be reliable, with good psychometric properties. However, no research teams have yet carried out independent validation. This study aimed to use the TCQ to investigate thinking amongst members of the general population with both bothersome and nonbothersome tinnitus and also to verify its factor structure. Design: Three hundred forty-two members of the public with tinnitus completed the TCQ online or on paper. They also rated their tinnitus on a scale as “not a problem,” “a small problem,” “a moderate problem,” “a big problem,” or a “very big problem.” The authors tested the original factor structure of the TCQ using confirmatory factor analysis and then calculated the mean scores for each item, comparing mean total scores across “problem categories” for the full questionnaire and for the positive and negative subscales. Results: The original two-factor structure of the TCQ was a good fit to the data when the correlation between positive and negative factors was fixed at zero (root mean square error of approximation = 0.064, 90% confidence interval = 0.058 to 0.070). Items pertaining to wishing the tinnitus would go away and despairing that it would ever get better had the highest mean scores. The mean total score for the “no problem” group (M = 31.17, SD = 16.03) was not significantly different from the mean total score for the “small problem” group (M = 34.00, SD = 12.44, p = 0.99). Differences between mean scores for all other groups were statistically significant. For the negative subscale, differences were statistically significant between all problem categories. For the positive subscale, the differences between mean scores were only statistically significant for the “no problem” group (M = 28.40, SD = 17.11) compared with the “moderate problem” group (M = 18.55, SD = 8.64, p = 0.02) and for the “moderate problem” group compared with the “very big problem” group (M = 26.79, SD = 11.66, p = 0.002). Positive and negative factors were uncorrelated ( ρ = −0.03.) Conclusions: The TCQ is a valid measure of positive and negative thinking in tinnitus, and the authors recommend its use in research and therapeutic settings. Negative thinking appears to be associated with more problematic tinnitus, but positive thinking is not associated with unproblematic tinnitus, suggesting that reducing negative thinking may be more important than teaching positive thinking in therapy." @default.
• W2516079105 created "2016-09-16" @default.
• W2516079105 creator A5019622393 @default.
• W2516079105 creator A5044444464 @default.
• W2516079105 creator A5050900278 @default.
• W2516079105 creator A5075164186 @default.
• W2516079105 date "2017-01-01" @default.
• W2516079105 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2516079105 title "Positive and Negative Thinking in Tinnitus: Factor Structure of the Tinnitus Cognitions Questionnaire" @default.
• W2516079105 cites W1930155975 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W1949882957 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W1971410477 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W1973709633 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W1974514523 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W1977443986 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2000890576 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2005306244 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2008301137 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2009056799 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2014543370 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2018201949 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2024588949 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2031047188 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2045922519 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2051657721 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2065182309 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2071666535 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2080554725 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2088018963 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2104701656 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2123074705 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2125017541 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2142709786 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2144958723 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2148604942 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2150966070 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2163297822 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2175727343 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2418363792 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2432882385 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2533914482 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2588720584 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W2602918391 @default.
• W2516079105 cites W4293117483 @default.
• W2516079105 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000000365" @default.
• W2516079105 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5181122" @default.
• W2516079105 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27560491" @default.
• W2516079105 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2516079105 type Work @default.
• W2516079105 sameAs 2516079105 @default.
• W2516079105 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W2516079105 countsByYear W25160791052017 @default.
• W2516079105 countsByYear W25160791052019 @default.
• W2516079105 countsByYear W25160791052020 @default.
• W2516079105 countsByYear W25160791052021 @default.
• W2516079105 countsByYear W25160791052022 @default.
• W2516079105 countsByYear W25160791052023 @default.
• W2516079105 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2516079105 hasAuthorship W2516079105A5019622393 @default.
• W2516079105 hasAuthorship W2516079105A5044444464 @default.
• W2516079105 hasAuthorship W2516079105A5050900278 @default.
• W2516079105 hasAuthorship W2516079105A5075164186 @default.
• W2516079105 hasBestOaLocation W25160791052 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConcept C139265228 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConcept C2776992516 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConcept C40722632 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConcept C71104824 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConceptScore W2516079105C105795698 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConceptScore W2516079105C118552586 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConceptScore W2516079105C139265228 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConceptScore W2516079105C15744967 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConceptScore W2516079105C169900460 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConceptScore W2516079105C2776992516 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConceptScore W2516079105C2908647359 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConceptScore W2516079105C33923547 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConceptScore W2516079105C40722632 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConceptScore W2516079105C70410870 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConceptScore W2516079105C71104824 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConceptScore W2516079105C71924100 @default.
• W2516079105 hasConceptScore W2516079105C99454951 @default.
• W2516079105 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2516079105 hasLocation W25160791051 @default.
• W2516079105 hasLocation W25160791052 @default.
• W2516079105 hasLocation W25160791053 @default.
• W2516079105 hasLocation W25160791054 @default.
• W2516079105 hasLocation W25160791055 @default.
• W2516079105 hasLocation W25160791056 @default.
• W2516079105 hasLocation W25160791057 @default.
• W2516079105 hasLocation W25160791058 @default.

• next