FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2516242264> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2516242264 endingPage "423" @default.
• W2516242264 startingPage "423" @default.
• W2516242264 abstract "Factors possibly associated with high (over 5%) and low (0-5%) predation intensities were compared among 95 sheep or goat producers in 5 states to determine if important differences were evident between the 2 groups. Data were compared for the following variables: losses to predation, flock size, type of ranch operation, management practices, predator indices, prey indices, use of U.S. Animal Damage Control program, private control efforts, predation history, timing of predation, and presence of other sheep or goats nearby. Overall, 45% of the producers reported over 5% predation losses of their lambs or kids and predation percentages tended to increase with decreased flock sizes. Feeder lamb and range sheep operations had predominantly low predation loss percentages, but most operations that included goats reported over 5% predation losses due to goat predation. A variety of management practices were used by both groups; however, low loss producers indicated low natural prey and predator populations. Most of the producers used the federal ADC program and some type of private control effort, although more high loss producers used both types. Rough, bottom, and brush grazing lands, historic predation problems, and high predator indices characterized many of the high loss producers. Predation intensity on livestock among producers is variable (Gee et al. 1977, Nass 1980). Various studies (deCalesta 1978, Schaefer et al. 1981, and others) have shown that livestock losses to predators vary significantly among samples of producers; however, data on reasons for this variability are lacking (Gee et al. 1977). Frequently, experienced animal damage control personnel know or suspect why specific levels of predation are occurring at specific times, but there have been no standardized mechanisms for recording, tabulating, and comparing the information on a ranchby-ranch basis. Boggess et al. 1980, Meduna 1977, and Schaefer et al. 1981 have explored the effects of some husbandry practices on livestock predation levels. The objective of our study was to identify factors common to ranches with high sheep or goat predation and compare them with low predation loss ranches." @default.
• W2516242264 created "2016-09-16" @default.
• W2516242264 creator A5039625297 @default.
• W2516242264 creator A5044952746 @default.
• W2516242264 creator A5070621419 @default.
• W2516242264 date "1984-09-01" @default.
• W2516242264 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2516242264 title "Circumstances Associated with Predation Rates on Sheep and Goats" @default.
• W2516242264 cites W1514995372 @default.
• W2516242264 cites W1980050843 @default.
• W2516242264 cites W2142940140 @default.
• W2516242264 cites W2321732804 @default.
• W2516242264 cites W2333756096 @default.
• W2516242264 cites W2511602443 @default.
• W2516242264 cites W1776972348 @default.
• W2516242264 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/3899629" @default.
• W2516242264 hasPublicationYear "1984" @default.
• W2516242264 type Work @default.
• W2516242264 sameAs 2516242264 @default.
• W2516242264 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W2516242264 countsByYear W25162422642014 @default.
• W2516242264 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2516242264 hasAuthorship W2516242264A5039625297 @default.
• W2516242264 hasAuthorship W2516242264A5044952746 @default.
• W2516242264 hasAuthorship W2516242264A5070621419 @default.
• W2516242264 hasBestOaLocation W25162422642 @default.
• W2516242264 hasConcept C112964050 @default.
• W2516242264 hasConcept C140793950 @default.
• W2516242264 hasConcept C188382862 @default.
• W2516242264 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2516242264 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2516242264 hasConcept C2777904157 @default.
• W2516242264 hasConcept C6557445 @default.
• W2516242264 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2516242264 hasConceptScore W2516242264C112964050 @default.
• W2516242264 hasConceptScore W2516242264C140793950 @default.
• W2516242264 hasConceptScore W2516242264C188382862 @default.
• W2516242264 hasConceptScore W2516242264C18903297 @default.
• W2516242264 hasConceptScore W2516242264C205649164 @default.
• W2516242264 hasConceptScore W2516242264C2777904157 @default.
• W2516242264 hasConceptScore W2516242264C6557445 @default.
• W2516242264 hasConceptScore W2516242264C86803240 @default.
• W2516242264 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2516242264 hasLocation W25162422641 @default.
• W2516242264 hasLocation W25162422642 @default.
• W2516242264 hasOpenAccess W2516242264 @default.
• W2516242264 hasPrimaryLocation W25162422641 @default.
• W2516242264 hasRelatedWork W1966079542 @default.
• W2516242264 hasRelatedWork W2001124188 @default.
• W2516242264 hasRelatedWork W2022853094 @default.
• W2516242264 hasRelatedWork W2045627274 @default.
• W2516242264 hasRelatedWork W2074289327 @default.
• W2516242264 hasRelatedWork W2095642794 @default.
• W2516242264 hasRelatedWork W2106779375 @default.
• W2516242264 hasRelatedWork W2126000116 @default.
• W2516242264 hasRelatedWork W2329769991 @default.
• W2516242264 hasRelatedWork W4220702800 @default.
• W2516242264 hasVolume "37" @default.
• W2516242264 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2516242264 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2516242264 magId "2516242264" @default.
• W2516242264 workType "article" @default.