FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2516326257> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2516326257 endingPage "415" @default.
• W2516326257 startingPage "406" @default.
• W2516326257 abstract "The objective of this prospective trial was to compare the clinical effectiveness of bonded retainers with vacuum-formed retainers, in terms of maintaining the results of orthodontic treatment in the lower arch up to 18 months post debond.This was a hospital-based, prospective randomized controlled clinical trial in which a total of 82 subjects were randomly allocated using a computer-generated number sequence to 1 of 2 groups, receiving either a vacuum-formed retainer (Essix Ace plastic (120 mm; DENTSPLY Raintree Essix, Sarasota, Fla) or a bonded retainer (0.0175 coaxial archwire (Ortho-Care, UK, Shipley, United Kingdom) bonded in place with Transbond LR (3M United Kingdom, Brachnell, United Kingdom) for the mandibular arch. Each number was placed in an opaque, concealed envelope and chosen randomly by the study subject; this determined the allocation group. Eligibility criteria included patients nearing debond after treatment with 0.022 × 0.028-in slot size preadjusted edgewise fixed orthodontic appliances whose pretreatment records and study models were available to confirm pretreatment labial segment crowding or spacing and who had clinically acceptable alignment at the end of treatment. The main outcome was to investigate the clinical effectiveness of the 2 types of retainers in terms of changes in incisor irregularity at 6 months of retention. The following measurements were recorded at each time point (6, 12, and 18 months) with a digital caliper: Little's irregularity index, intercanine width, intermolar width, arch length, and extraction site opening. Blinding was applicable only at debond because of the permanence of 1 intervention.The 2 groups were well matched with respect to age, sex, clinical characteristics, and treatment plans. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups for changes in Little's irregularity index at 6 months, with the vacuum-formed retainer group showing greater changes than the bonded retainer group (P = 0.008). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for changes in Little's irregularity index at 12 and 18 months.There were also no statistically significant changes at any time for intercanine width, intermolar width, arch length, or extraction site opening.Some relapse is likely after fixed appliance therapy irrespective of retainer choice, and this is minimal in most patients at 6 months after debond. Bonded retainers have a better ability to hold the mandibular incisor alignment in the first 6 months after treatment than do vacuum-formed retainers.Not applicable.The protocol was not published before trial commencement.There is no funding or conflict of interest to be declared." @default.
• W2516326257 created "2016-09-16" @default.
• W2516326257 creator A5002192683 @default.
• W2516326257 creator A5040236646 @default.
• W2516326257 creator A5045431508 @default.
• W2516326257 creator A5052595460 @default.
• W2516326257 date "2016-09-01" @default.
• W2516326257 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2516326257 title "Effectiveness of bonded and vacuum-formed retainers: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial" @default.
• W2516326257 cites W1964695611 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W1967654423 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W1971633666 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W1971975962 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W1972666069 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W1990451713 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W1991488983 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W1992597013 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W1993745600 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2004517305 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2011082387 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2014557046 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2026451509 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2031682814 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2036910243 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2040895193 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2060351894 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2061515992 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2076979607 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2080437165 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2083169522 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2097536622 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2100289093 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2101083988 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2101691503 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2101821566 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2102037369 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2104591007 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2107318037 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2109459351 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2111091107 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2112248781 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2117189129 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2124450925 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2124644874 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2141647775 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2149987188 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2153351628 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2166192664 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2170584078 @default.
• W2516326257 cites W2170683387 @default.
• W2516326257 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.03.020" @default.
• W2516326257 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27585768" @default.
• W2516326257 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2516326257 type Work @default.
• W2516326257 sameAs 2516326257 @default.
• W2516326257 citedByCount "44" @default.
• W2516326257 countsByYear W25163262572016 @default.
• W2516326257 countsByYear W25163262572017 @default.
• W2516326257 countsByYear W25163262572018 @default.
• W2516326257 countsByYear W25163262572019 @default.
• W2516326257 countsByYear W25163262572020 @default.
• W2516326257 countsByYear W25163262572021 @default.
• W2516326257 countsByYear W25163262572022 @default.
• W2516326257 countsByYear W25163262572023 @default.
• W2516326257 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2516326257 hasAuthorship W2516326257A5002192683 @default.
• W2516326257 hasAuthorship W2516326257A5040236646 @default.
• W2516326257 hasAuthorship W2516326257A5045431508 @default.
• W2516326257 hasAuthorship W2516326257A5052595460 @default.
• W2516326257 hasBestOaLocation W25163262572 @default.
• W2516326257 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2516326257 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2516326257 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2516326257 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2516326257 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2516326257 hasConcept C2771230 @default.
• W2516326257 hasConcept C2779372575 @default.
• W2516326257 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2516326257 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2516326257 hasConceptScore W2516326257C141071460 @default.
• W2516326257 hasConceptScore W2516326257C159985019 @default.
• W2516326257 hasConceptScore W2516326257C168563851 @default.
• W2516326257 hasConceptScore W2516326257C192562407 @default.
• W2516326257 hasConceptScore W2516326257C199343813 @default.
• W2516326257 hasConceptScore W2516326257C2771230 @default.
• W2516326257 hasConceptScore W2516326257C2779372575 @default.
• W2516326257 hasConceptScore W2516326257C29694066 @default.
• W2516326257 hasConceptScore W2516326257C71924100 @default.
• W2516326257 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2516326257 hasLocation W25163262571 @default.
• W2516326257 hasLocation W25163262572 @default.
• W2516326257 hasLocation W25163262573 @default.
• W2516326257 hasOpenAccess W2516326257 @default.
• W2516326257 hasPrimaryLocation W25163262571 @default.
• W2516326257 hasRelatedWork W1967744186 @default.
• W2516326257 hasRelatedWork W2091969123 @default.
• W2516326257 hasRelatedWork W2165983893 @default.
• W2516326257 hasRelatedWork W2471877510 @default.

• next