FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2517365780> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2517365780 endingPage "371" @default.
• W2517365780 startingPage "353" @default.
• W2517365780 abstract "ANSELM OF LUCCA AND THE DOCTRINE OF COERCION: THE LEGAL IMPACT OF THE SCHISM OF 1080? BY Kathleen G. Cushing* In the spring of 1085, Anselm of Lucca wrote to Bishop Hermann of Metz, commending him, at a time when the caritas of many was growing cold, for his willingness to persevere and to undergo even death in the cause of the Lord.1 The imperialists, he wrote, seemed to recrucify Christ and his heir, the universal Church of Peter, and were contending with new and unheard-of blasphemies even against the prince of the apostles himself.2 Schism had left the reform movement in a dire climate of crisis: Christ, as Anselm stirringly and significantly noted, stood alone on the field of battle.3 There can be little doubt that the schism of 1080 was a thorough disaster for the papacy of Gregory VII. Of course, schism at any time represented a potential danger, what with its creation of rival hierarchies from whom great benefits could be reaped. Yet the schism that followed from Pope Gregory VH's second excommunication of Henry IV at the Lenten synod of 1080 was a particularly bitter one, provoking a climate of seemingly insurmountable intransigence.4 Re- *Dr. Cushing received her Ph.D. degree from the University of Oxford, and is currently preparing a book on Anselm of Lucca, reform, and the canon law for Oxford Historical Monographs. lBriefsammlungen der Zeit Heinrichs IV., no. 21, edd. Carl Erdmann and Norbert Fickermann (Monumenta Germaniae Histórica, Briefen der deutschen Kaiserzeit, V [Weimar, 1950]), p. 50: Quia animam tuam pretiosiorem quam te non fecisti quo iniquitate multiplica caritas multorum refrigescit, sicut nobis relatum est, disposuisti. 2BriefSammlungen, no. 21 at p. 51. Cf. Anselm's commentary on Psalm ii (fragments), in Paul ofBernried, Vita Gregorii VIL , c. 1 12, inJohannes M. Watterich (ed.),Pontificum Romanorum Vitae, I (Leipzig, 1862), at p. 541: Nonne iterum Barabbas eligitur et Christus sub Pilato morti addicitur, cum Ravennas Guibertus eligitur et Papa Gregorius reprobatur? WriefSammlungen, no. 21 at p. 50: Ecce enim Christus solus in campo ••The events that led from the Synod of Worms in 1076 to the second excommunication of Henry IV in 1080, the clash between Gregory VII and Henry IV, its back353 354 ANSELM OF LUCCA AND THE DOCTRINE OF COERCION gionally, of course, the impact of the schism varied. Clement III enjoyed little if any sustained support in France, Spain, and England. But in the Reich and in Italy, the position ofGregory VII and his supporters was severely undermined. In the climate of recrimination and partisan obstinacy that followed, a number of disturbing and problematic issues—many of which had been simmering under the surface since 1076, if not earlier—quickly rose to the forefront. For by bitterly intensifying the debate over the relationship between secular and ecclesiastical authority, the schism had brought two diametrically opposed, and seemingly irreconcilable, concepts of the right order of the world to a point of no return. Henry IV and his supporters, particularly among the episcopate, labeled Gregory a dangerous man who subverted the traditional order in favor of a quasi-autocratic hierarchy with himself at the apex. Gregory and his supporters, for their part, continued to insist upon not merely the right but the overwhelming duty of the pope to direct Christian society at all levels. Events had in essence outstripped contemporaries ' capacity to understand them. Theoretical issues such as rival obediences, the nature of sworn oaths, the relationships between catholics and schismatics, and the validity ofthe sacraments and orders of those who were extra ecclesiam quickly became pressing and practical concerns as the two hierarchies vied for authoritative position. As the rapid proliferation of polemical treatises indicated, each side felt the need for a justification of policy rooted firmly in ancient tradition . As such, the schism had a profound impact upon the canon law. While it is perhaps unwise to be too rigorous in insisting that the schism dictated the development, or incorporation, of certain themes in the canon law, neither can one overlook the ways in which the law seemed to reflect, or at least respond to, the problems made manifest by the schism. A striking..." @default.
• W2517365780 created "2016-09-16" @default.
• W2517365780 creator A5064915301 @default.
• W2517365780 date "1995-01-01" @default.
• W2517365780 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2517365780 title "Anselm of Lucca and the Doctrine of Coercion: The Legal Impact of the Schism of 1080?" @default.
• W2517365780 cites W1973585996 @default.
• W2517365780 cites W1993065346 @default.
• W2517365780 cites W2536874466 @default.
• W2517365780 cites W2577311322 @default.
• W2517365780 cites W3006863946 @default.
• W2517365780 cites W568927344 @default.
• W2517365780 cites W638901358 @default.
• W2517365780 cites W582009115 @default.
• W2517365780 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/cat.1995.0031" @default.
• W2517365780 hasPublicationYear "1995" @default.
• W2517365780 type Work @default.
• W2517365780 sameAs 2517365780 @default.
• W2517365780 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2517365780 countsByYear W25173657802015 @default.
• W2517365780 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2517365780 hasAuthorship W2517365780A5064915301 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConcept C195244886 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConcept C2777188754 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConcept C2778627824 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConcept C2778653666 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConcept C2779045295 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConcept C74916050 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConceptScore W2517365780C138885662 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConceptScore W2517365780C17744445 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConceptScore W2517365780C195244886 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConceptScore W2517365780C199539241 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConceptScore W2517365780C27206212 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConceptScore W2517365780C2776211767 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConceptScore W2517365780C2777188754 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConceptScore W2517365780C2778627824 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConceptScore W2517365780C2778653666 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConceptScore W2517365780C2779045295 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConceptScore W2517365780C41895202 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConceptScore W2517365780C74916050 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConceptScore W2517365780C94625758 @default.
• W2517365780 hasConceptScore W2517365780C95457728 @default.
• W2517365780 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2517365780 hasLocation W25173657801 @default.
• W2517365780 hasOpenAccess W2517365780 @default.
• W2517365780 hasPrimaryLocation W25173657801 @default.
• W2517365780 hasRelatedWork W1972999684 @default.
• W2517365780 hasRelatedWork W2029922949 @default.
• W2517365780 hasRelatedWork W2072134474 @default.
• W2517365780 hasRelatedWork W2321577163 @default.
• W2517365780 hasRelatedWork W2517365780 @default.
• W2517365780 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2517365780 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2517365780 hasRelatedWork W3023304313 @default.
• W2517365780 hasRelatedWork W4252810745 @default.
• W2517365780 hasRelatedWork W289415422 @default.
• W2517365780 hasVolume "81" @default.
• W2517365780 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2517365780 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2517365780 magId "2517365780" @default.
• W2517365780 workType "article" @default.