FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2520619373> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2520619373 endingPage "195" @default.
• W2520619373 startingPage "182" @default.
• W2520619373 abstract "A case study on the source separation of municipal solid waste (MSW) was performed in Changsha, the capital city of Hunan Province, China. The objective of this study is to analyze the effects of different separation methods and compare their effects with citizens’ attitudes and inclination. An effect evaluation method based on accuracy rate and miscellany rate was proposed to study the performance of different separation methods. A large-scale questionnaire survey was conducted to determine citizens’ attitudes and inclination toward source separation. Survey result shows that the vast majority of respondents hold consciously positive attitudes toward participation in source separation. Moreover, the respondents ignore the operability of separation methods and would rather choose the complex separation method involving four or more subclassed categories. For the effects of separation methods, the site experiment result demonstrates that the relatively simple separation method involving two categories (food waste and other waste) achieves the best effect with the highest accuracy rate (83.1%) and the lowest miscellany rate (16.9%) among the proposed experimental alternatives. The outcome reflects the inconsistency between people’s environmental awareness and behavior. Such inconsistency and conflict may be attributed to the lack of environmental knowledge. Environmental education is assumed to be a fundamental solution to improve the effect of source separation of MSW in Changsha. Important management tips on source separation, including the reformation of the current pay-as-you-throw (PAYT) system, are presented in this work.Implications: A case study on the source separation of municipal solid waste was performed in Changsha. An effect evaluation method based on accuracy rate and miscellany rate was proposed to study the performance of different separation methods. The site experiment result demonstrates that the two-category (food waste and other waste) method achieves the best effect. The inconsistency between people’s inclination and the effect of source separation exists. The proposed method can be expanded to other cities to determine the most effective separation method during planning stages or to evaluate the performance of running source separation systems." @default.
• W2520619373 created "2016-09-23" @default.
• W2520619373 creator A5010567621 @default.
• W2520619373 creator A5018083227 @default.
• W2520619373 creator A5072097425 @default.
• W2520619373 creator A5077478846 @default.
• W2520619373 creator A5077518773 @default.
• W2520619373 creator A5090475934 @default.
• W2520619373 date "2016-09-14" @default.
• W2520619373 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2520619373 title "Source separation of municipal solid waste: The effects of different separation methods and citizens’ inclination—case study of Changsha, China" @default.
• W2520619373 cites W1561936952 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W1665145144 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W1963747554 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W1964008227 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W1968712056 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W1971646231 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W1973159138 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W1975010040 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W1978095473 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W1978229947 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W1981152957 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W1986344425 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W1990487000 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W1993070585 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W1998194115 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2000806946 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2011518784 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2012948282 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2015161281 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2023717234 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2025666288 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2032826563 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2034005673 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2036596200 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2040868884 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2041515128 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2045748225 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2050854702 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2053269850 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2053774102 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2054937401 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2055949247 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2058911394 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2059184520 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2061576259 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2070347319 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2072853760 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2076675357 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2078244607 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2082265302 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2093950088 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2095530201 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2121556469 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W2157889041 @default.
• W2520619373 cites W630984736 @default.
• W2520619373 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2016.1222317" @default.
• W2520619373 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27629489" @default.
• W2520619373 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2520619373 type Work @default.
• W2520619373 sameAs 2520619373 @default.
• W2520619373 citedByCount "29" @default.
• W2520619373 countsByYear W25206193732018 @default.
• W2520619373 countsByYear W25206193732019 @default.
• W2520619373 countsByYear W25206193732020 @default.
• W2520619373 countsByYear W25206193732021 @default.
• W2520619373 countsByYear W25206193732022 @default.
• W2520619373 countsByYear W25206193732023 @default.
• W2520619373 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2520619373 hasAuthorship W2520619373A5010567621 @default.
• W2520619373 hasAuthorship W2520619373A5018083227 @default.
• W2520619373 hasAuthorship W2520619373A5072097425 @default.
• W2520619373 hasAuthorship W2520619373A5077478846 @default.
• W2520619373 hasAuthorship W2520619373A5077518773 @default.
• W2520619373 hasAuthorship W2520619373A5090475934 @default.
• W2520619373 hasBestOaLocation W25206193731 @default.
• W2520619373 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2520619373 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W2520619373 hasConcept C126231374 @default.
• W2520619373 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2520619373 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
• W2520619373 hasConcept C200601418 @default.
• W2520619373 hasConcept C2776061190 @default.
• W2520619373 hasConcept C2776864781 @default.
• W2520619373 hasConcept C2778055342 @default.
• W2520619373 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2520619373 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2520619373 hasConcept C548081761 @default.
• W2520619373 hasConcept C74916050 @default.
• W2520619373 hasConcept C75779659 @default.
• W2520619373 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2520619373 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2520619373 hasConceptScore W2520619373C105795698 @default.
• W2520619373 hasConceptScore W2520619373C11413529 @default.
• W2520619373 hasConceptScore W2520619373C126231374 @default.
• W2520619373 hasConceptScore W2520619373C127413603 @default.
• W2520619373 hasConceptScore W2520619373C18762648 @default.
• W2520619373 hasConceptScore W2520619373C200601418 @default.

• next