FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2520966659> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2520966659 endingPage "e694" @default.
• W2520966659 startingPage "e694" @default.
• W2520966659 abstract "In The Lancet in 2011, Johanna Crane argued for a “21st-century scramble for Africa by US universities”,1Crane J Scrambling for Africa? Universities and global health.Lancet. 2011; 377: 1388-1390Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar as global health becomes “an increasingly hot field”.1Crane J Scrambling for Africa? Universities and global health.Lancet. 2011; 377: 1388-1390Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar This popularity can be tracked, among other ways, through the increase of global health partnerships (GHPs). Research has helpfully explored power inequities between partner institutions, bureaucracy, misplaced research priorities, their (un)sustainability, and their potential to contribute to medical skills shortages in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).2Lasker JN Hoping to help: the promises and pitfalls of global health volunteering. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY2016Crossref Google Scholar, 3Brown H Global health partnerships, governance, and sovereign responsibility in western Kenya.Am Ethnol. 2015; 42: 340-355Crossref Scopus (35) Google Scholar However, the research has also missed something crucial because it has not captured something far more basic and instructive: the geographies of GHP arrangements. To this end, we have undertaken what we believe to be the first systematic analysis of the geographical distribution of university GHPs. Using the Times Higher Education World University Rankings 2015–16 as a starting point, we compiled a database of each of the top 100 institutions' GHPs. We then used this database to map the geographies of these partnership arrangements. Our map (figure) shows the clear geographic regions and institutions in LMICs—particularly universities in Makerere (Uganda) and Addis Ababa (Ethiopia)—that have been successfully strategic in forging partnerships with global north universities. Moreover, GHPs are not as clearly neocolonial as has often been argued,4Horton R Offline: is global health neocolonialist?.Lancet. 2013; 382: 1690Summary Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (29) Google Scholar although clear linkages between Dutch and Indonesian institutions, between the UK and its former colonies, and between US institutions and Haiti are clear. The map also shows the substantial untouched regions that are in great health-care need and remain unpartnered (ie, north and central Africa and central Asia), as well as an absence of the kind of south–south coalitions so often advocated. Although the map is obviously an artifact of the sample universities, many of the top Asian universities tend to partner with US rather than LMIC institutions. We are aware that recent partnerships—or those not openly advertised online—could have been missed by our search strategy in this dynamic field. For this reason, we have made the dataset publicly available, and invite colleagues to engage in the collective process of its editing to ensure the accuracy and representativeness of this open-access resource. Our findings might be unsurprising, but warrant a return to Richard Horton's question: “Who, then, is global health for?”5Horton R Offline: the case against global health.Lancet. 2014; 383: 1705Summary Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (13) Google Scholar This question draws attention to the complex politics that both drive and emerge from the geographies of GHPs. Interrogating these political drivers should be central to future global health research agendas. We declare no competing interests." @default.
• W2520966659 created "2016-09-23" @default.
• W2520966659 creator A5026103274 @default.
• W2520966659 creator A5057659648 @default.
• W2520966659 date "2016-10-01" @default.
• W2520966659 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2520966659 title "Mapping university global health partnerships" @default.
• W2520966659 cites W1803563162 @default.
• W2520966659 cites W1968507629 @default.
• W2520966659 cites W1984261585 @default.
• W2520966659 cites W2059923402 @default.
• W2520966659 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(16)30213-3" @default.
• W2520966659 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27633432" @default.
• W2520966659 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2520966659 type Work @default.
• W2520966659 sameAs 2520966659 @default.
• W2520966659 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2520966659 countsByYear W25209666592017 @default.
• W2520966659 countsByYear W25209666592018 @default.
• W2520966659 countsByYear W25209666592019 @default.
• W2520966659 countsByYear W25209666592020 @default.
• W2520966659 countsByYear W25209666592021 @default.
• W2520966659 countsByYear W25209666592022 @default.
• W2520966659 countsByYear W25209666592023 @default.
• W2520966659 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2520966659 hasAuthorship W2520966659A5026103274 @default.
• W2520966659 hasAuthorship W2520966659A5057659648 @default.
• W2520966659 hasBestOaLocation W25209666591 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConcept C39389867 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConcept C46578552 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConcept C51575053 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConcept C71750763 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConceptScore W2520966659C160735492 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConceptScore W2520966659C161191863 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConceptScore W2520966659C162324750 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConceptScore W2520966659C17744445 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConceptScore W2520966659C187736073 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConceptScore W2520966659C199539241 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConceptScore W2520966659C2779473830 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConceptScore W2520966659C39389867 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConceptScore W2520966659C39549134 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConceptScore W2520966659C41008148 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConceptScore W2520966659C46578552 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConceptScore W2520966659C51575053 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConceptScore W2520966659C71750763 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConceptScore W2520966659C83867959 @default.
• W2520966659 hasConceptScore W2520966659C94625758 @default.
• W2520966659 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W2520966659 hasLocation W25209666591 @default.
• W2520966659 hasLocation W25209666592 @default.
• W2520966659 hasLocation W25209666593 @default.
• W2520966659 hasLocation W25209666594 @default.
• W2520966659 hasLocation W25209666595 @default.
• W2520966659 hasLocation W25209666596 @default.
• W2520966659 hasOpenAccess W2520966659 @default.
• W2520966659 hasPrimaryLocation W25209666591 @default.
• W2520966659 hasRelatedWork W2017502550 @default.
• W2520966659 hasRelatedWork W2057788587 @default.
• W2520966659 hasRelatedWork W2165746858 @default.
• W2520966659 hasRelatedWork W2374217650 @default.
• W2520966659 hasRelatedWork W2524350515 @default.
• W2520966659 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2520966659 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2520966659 hasRelatedWork W2989652823 @default.
• W2520966659 hasRelatedWork W3082677088 @default.
• W2520966659 hasRelatedWork W3198364210 @default.
• W2520966659 hasVolume "4" @default.
• W2520966659 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2520966659 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2520966659 magId "2520966659" @default.
• W2520966659 workType "article" @default.