FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2522259055> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2522259055 endingPage "280" @default.
• W2522259055 startingPage "272" @default.
• W2522259055 abstract "Objective:This study was to examine the effect of complementary therapy (CT) for nurses with high stress levels. It was taken before we employ this technique for cancer survivors because cancer patients are a heterogeneous group that requires substantial resources to investigate.Methods:A quasi-experimental design with five groups was employed for this study. The groups were examined whether there were effects for reducing the stress and the differences in effectiveness among four intervention groups and a nonintervention group. Stress relief was measured using pulse rate and blood pressure measurements and the short form of the profile of mood states (POMS-SF). The participants practiced the therapy for 20 min twice per week for 3 weeks. A two-way factorial analysis of variance was used to analyze the data.Results:The study enrolled 98 nurses (92 female and 6 male) with a mean age of 37.3 ± 10.5 years (range: 22–60 years). Fifty-nine nurses had 10 or more years of nursing experience. There were significant differences in pulse rate and the POMS-SF scores. All groups were effective for reducing the stress level of high-stress nurses, whereas four intervention CT groups were not more effective than nonintervention group.Conclusions:The complementary therapies were useful for nurses with high stress levels. Thus, they can be used as a self-management tool for such nurses. Afterward, we will use the CT for cancer survivors to determine whether it can improve the quality of life of cancer patients. This study was to examine the effect of complementary therapy (CT) for nurses with high stress levels. It was taken before we employ this technique for cancer survivors because cancer patients are a heterogeneous group that requires substantial resources to investigate. A quasi-experimental design with five groups was employed for this study. The groups were examined whether there were effects for reducing the stress and the differences in effectiveness among four intervention groups and a nonintervention group. Stress relief was measured using pulse rate and blood pressure measurements and the short form of the profile of mood states (POMS-SF). The participants practiced the therapy for 20 min twice per week for 3 weeks. A two-way factorial analysis of variance was used to analyze the data. The study enrolled 98 nurses (92 female and 6 male) with a mean age of 37.3 ± 10.5 years (range: 22–60 years). Fifty-nine nurses had 10 or more years of nursing experience. There were significant differences in pulse rate and the POMS-SF scores. All groups were effective for reducing the stress level of high-stress nurses, whereas four intervention CT groups were not more effective than nonintervention group. The complementary therapies were useful for nurses with high stress levels. Thus, they can be used as a self-management tool for such nurses. Afterward, we will use the CT for cancer survivors to determine whether it can improve the quality of life of cancer patients." @default.
• W2522259055 created "2016-09-30" @default.
• W2522259055 creator A5036623606 @default.
• W2522259055 creator A5067281587 @default.
• W2522259055 creator A5067580254 @default.
• W2522259055 creator A5079274218 @default.
• W2522259055 creator A5085326256 @default.
• W2522259055 date "2016-07-01" @default.
• W2522259055 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2522259055 title "The effect of complementary therapy for hospital nurses with high stress" @default.
• W2522259055 cites W1971639265 @default.
• W2522259055 cites W1972454857 @default.
• W2522259055 cites W2050506171 @default.
• W2522259055 cites W2079037116 @default.
• W2522259055 cites W2088524656 @default.
• W2522259055 cites W2089646992 @default.
• W2522259055 cites W2120940824 @default.
• W2522259055 cites W2181917300 @default.
• W2522259055 cites W2260984772 @default.
• W2522259055 cites W2290650280 @default.
• W2522259055 cites W2291297161 @default.
• W2522259055 doi "https://doi.org/10.4103/2347-5625.189810" @default.
• W2522259055 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5123520" @default.
• W2522259055 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27981171" @default.
• W2522259055 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2522259055 type Work @default.
• W2522259055 sameAs 2522259055 @default.
• W2522259055 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2522259055 countsByYear W25222590552017 @default.
• W2522259055 countsByYear W25222590552019 @default.
• W2522259055 countsByYear W25222590552020 @default.
• W2522259055 countsByYear W25222590552021 @default.
• W2522259055 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2522259055 hasAuthorship W2522259055A5036623606 @default.
• W2522259055 hasAuthorship W2522259055A5067281587 @default.
• W2522259055 hasAuthorship W2522259055A5067580254 @default.
• W2522259055 hasAuthorship W2522259055A5079274218 @default.
• W2522259055 hasAuthorship W2522259055A5085326256 @default.
• W2522259055 hasBestOaLocation W25222590551 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConcept C102959455 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConcept C2777353892 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConcept C2780733359 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConcept C2983331546 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConcept C99476002 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConceptScore W2522259055C102959455 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConceptScore W2522259055C105795698 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConceptScore W2522259055C121608353 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConceptScore W2522259055C126322002 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConceptScore W2522259055C159110408 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConceptScore W2522259055C1862650 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConceptScore W2522259055C2777353892 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConceptScore W2522259055C2779951463 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConceptScore W2522259055C2780665704 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConceptScore W2522259055C2780733359 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConceptScore W2522259055C2983331546 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConceptScore W2522259055C33923547 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConceptScore W2522259055C70410870 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConceptScore W2522259055C71924100 @default.
• W2522259055 hasConceptScore W2522259055C99476002 @default.
• W2522259055 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2522259055 hasLocation W25222590551 @default.
• W2522259055 hasLocation W25222590552 @default.
• W2522259055 hasLocation W25222590553 @default.
• W2522259055 hasLocation W25222590554 @default.
• W2522259055 hasOpenAccess W2522259055 @default.
• W2522259055 hasPrimaryLocation W25222590551 @default.
• W2522259055 hasRelatedWork W132950296 @default.
• W2522259055 hasRelatedWork W1970318785 @default.
• W2522259055 hasRelatedWork W1998990510 @default.
• W2522259055 hasRelatedWork W2005733304 @default.
• W2522259055 hasRelatedWork W2018726633 @default.
• W2522259055 hasRelatedWork W2323822967 @default.
• W2522259055 hasRelatedWork W2538259975 @default.
• W2522259055 hasRelatedWork W3032631047 @default.
• W2522259055 hasRelatedWork W3087263845 @default.
• W2522259055 hasRelatedWork W98113221 @default.
• W2522259055 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W2522259055 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2522259055 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2522259055 magId "2522259055" @default.
• W2522259055 workType "article" @default.