FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2522358268> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2522358268 endingPage "234" @default.
• W2522358268 startingPage "234" @default.
• W2522358268 abstract "PURPOSE: Although condyle is one of the frequent site of fracture in the mandible1, anatomical and functional complexity of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) make the treatment policy of mandibular condyle fracture controversial. 2,3 Watanabe et al. reported a novel treatment for mandibular condylar fractures: a dynamic distraction treatment. 4 This application of a dynamic internal distraction device is an effective and minimally invasive treatment; however, in our substantial experience on dynamic distraction treatment, we occasionally encounter rare cases in which resulted insufficient reduction of the fractured bony fragments. The purpose of this study is to investigate our clinical cases retrospectively, and establish a novel therapeutic strategy of mandibular condyle fracture. METHODS: The subjects were 55 cases who underwent condylar fracture treatment in 2006–2014. In reference to the Spiessl classification, cases were classified depend on the site of fracture (intra-articular or extra-articular) and the location of the fractured fragment (no change, dislocation or displacement). Clinical outcomes were evaluated with regard to TMJ function and occlusion. RESULT: Ten cases were treated by means of ORIF, 31 cases by dynamic distraction treatment, 2 cases by combination of ORIF and dynamic distraction treatment, and 12 cases by conservative therapy. The mean operative duration of ORIF was over six hours, and in some cases of intra-articular fracture, completion of surgery was impossible and discontinued. Dynamic distraction treatment worked well in most cases, however, in some cases with displacement of large bony fragments, only modest reduction was obtained and long period was needed to recovery of the TMJ. In such cases, combination of ORIF and dynamic distraction treatment achieved better outcomes. Conservative therapy was performed only when location of the fractured fragment was not changed. DISCUSSION: Dynamic distraction treatment is very effective when fractured fragment is not large (intra-articular fracture; Type VI) or the bone fragment remains within dislocation (Type IV, V). For extra-articular fracture with displacement of bony fragment (Type II, III), ORIF can be the choice, however, combination of ORIF and dynamic distraction treatment which can avoid plate fixing and thus be less-invasive may be more preferred by many surgeons. REFERENCES: 1. Zachariades N, Mezitis M, Mourouzis C, Fractures of the mandibular condyle: a review of 466 cases. Literature review, reflections on treatment and proposals. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006 34:421–432 2. Terashima, Y., Ohmori, K., Akizuki, T., Kurakata, Y., Nomura, S., and Sawada, A. Treatment of mandibular condylar fracture using an internal distraction device. Presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the Japan Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo, Japan, April 9, 2004. 3. Watanabe, Y., Terashima, Y., and Akizuki, T. A new distraction treatment of mandibular condylar fractures: Application of a dynamic internal distraction device. In P. A. Diner, E. Arnaud, and M. P. Vazquez (Eds.), Transactions of the 5th International Congress of Maxillofacial and Craniofacial Distraction, Paris, France, June 21–24, 2006. Bologna, Italy: Medimond, 2006. Pp. 93–98 4. Watanabe, Y., Terashima, Y., and Akizuki, T. A New Distraction Treatment for Bilateral Mandibular Condylar Fractures: Application of a Dynamic Internal Distraction Device, Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:906–909" @default.
• W2522358268 created "2016-09-30" @default.
• W2522358268 creator A5026060483 @default.
• W2522358268 creator A5030637460 @default.
• W2522358268 creator A5041539210 @default.
• W2522358268 creator A5059170521 @default.
• W2522358268 date "2016-09-01" @default.
• W2522358268 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2522358268 title "Abstract" @default.
• W2522358268 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gox.0000503213.35561.c1" @default.
• W2522358268 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5147384" @default.
• W2522358268 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2522358268 type Work @default.
• W2522358268 sameAs 2522358268 @default.
• W2522358268 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2522358268 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2522358268 hasAuthorship W2522358268A5026060483 @default.
• W2522358268 hasAuthorship W2522358268A5030637460 @default.
• W2522358268 hasAuthorship W2522358268A5041539210 @default.
• W2522358268 hasAuthorship W2522358268A5059170521 @default.
• W2522358268 hasBestOaLocation W25223582681 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConcept C107551265 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConcept C111335779 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConcept C2776378700 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConcept C2780202543 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConcept C3019396726 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConcept C96646087 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConceptScore W2522358268C107551265 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConceptScore W2522358268C111335779 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConceptScore W2522358268C141071460 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConceptScore W2522358268C15744967 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConceptScore W2522358268C169760540 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConceptScore W2522358268C199343813 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConceptScore W2522358268C2524010 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConceptScore W2522358268C2776378700 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConceptScore W2522358268C2780202543 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConceptScore W2522358268C29694066 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConceptScore W2522358268C3019396726 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConceptScore W2522358268C33923547 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConceptScore W2522358268C542102704 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConceptScore W2522358268C71924100 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConceptScore W2522358268C86803240 @default.
• W2522358268 hasConceptScore W2522358268C96646087 @default.
• W2522358268 hasIssue "9S" @default.
• W2522358268 hasLocation W25223582681 @default.
• W2522358268 hasLocation W25223582682 @default.
• W2522358268 hasOpenAccess W2522358268 @default.
• W2522358268 hasPrimaryLocation W25223582681 @default.
• W2522358268 hasRelatedWork W119667337 @default.
• W2522358268 hasRelatedWork W2319261677 @default.
• W2522358268 hasRelatedWork W2383224638 @default.
• W2522358268 hasRelatedWork W2387269444 @default.
• W2522358268 hasRelatedWork W2397002444 @default.
• W2522358268 hasRelatedWork W2474144202 @default.
• W2522358268 hasRelatedWork W2982110096 @default.
• W2522358268 hasRelatedWork W3183802844 @default.
• W2522358268 hasRelatedWork W3844751 @default.
• W2522358268 hasRelatedWork W4245655220 @default.
• W2522358268 hasVolume "4" @default.
• W2522358268 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2522358268 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2522358268 magId "2522358268" @default.
• W2522358268 workType "article" @default.