FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2525050063> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2525050063 endingPage "97" @default.
• W2525050063 startingPage "81" @default.
• W2525050063 abstract "Agreat deal of research has been focused on oil crops of various plants, especially members of the mustard family (Brassicaceae) such as species of Brassica. Canola (rapeseed; Brassica napus L. genome AACC, 2n=38) arises from spontaneous hybridization between turnip (Brassica rapa) (AA, 2n= 20) and cabbage (Brassica oleracea) (CC, 2n=18). It is now the second largest oilseed crop over the world after soybean (Glycine max) providing 13% of the world supplies (Abbas et al., 2009). Canola is primarily used for food and feed, but has recently gained an increasing interest as a source for bio-products (e.g., biodiesel). Besides that, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved canola oil with a Qualified Health Claim (QHC) due to its ability to reduce the risk of coronary heart disease (Miller-Cebert et al., 2009). Like any other crop species, to improve quality and quantity of Brassica spp., presence of sufficient genetic diver- sity is very important. In the breeding process, significant improvement of quality and production was achieved, as well as utilization of rapeseed oil in human nutrition. However, genetic variability in this important crop is restricted with regard to many characters of value for breeding process (Marjanovic-jeromela et al., 2009). The success in breeding programs of a crop species largely relies on the presence of sufficient genetic diversity in the germplasm and knowledge about the characteristics of the genotypes and their genetic relationship. Various methods have been elaborated for this purpose. Pedigree analysis is the most widely used method for estimating the degree of similarity between varieties or populations, but the necessary information on ancestry is not always accurate or available. Application of morphological traits is hindered by their limited number and by the modifying effect of environmental factors in some cases. The spread of DNA markers has allowed the genome to be analyzed directly, thus eliminating errors caused by environmental factors. By using these markers, the genome can be characterized with great accuracy. In addition to the estimation of degrees of relationship between different varieties, a further important use of these markers is to distinguish between genotypes. Numerous molecular markers have been used for variety identification in various plant species, which allow cultivar identification in early stages of plant development, being neutral to environmental effects (Mohammadi, 2002; Meszaros et al., 2007; Moghaddam et al., 2009). A variety of molecular markers including Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) (Thormann et al., 1994), Inter-Simple Sequence Repeats (ISSR) (Carolyn et al., 2000; Rudolph et al., 2002), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) (Sandip et al., 1999; Seyis et al., 2003; Jiang et al., 2007) and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) (Ashik Rabbani et al., 1998; Lazaro and Aguinagalde, 1998; Divaret et al., 1999), have been used to study the extent of genetic variation among the diverse group of important crop species in the genus Brassica (Afiah et al., 2007; Marjanovic-jeromela et al., 2009). In this study, RAPD and ISSR markers based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were applied. The value of RAPD analysis for efficient germplasm management in plants is already known (Young, 2000; Jaroslava et al., 2002). The technique is quick, easy and requires less time. This detects nucleotide sequence polymorphisms using a single primer of arbitrary nucleotide sequence (Welsh and McClelland, 1990; Williams et al., 1990). ISSR permits detection of polymorphisms in inter-microsatellite loci, using a primer designed from dinucleotide or trinucleotide simple sequence repeats. Only a few papers comparing re- sults obtained by different molecular genetic methods have been published in the case of Brassica napus L. The capability of individual methods to differentiate the analyzed canola genotypes is described here. The present study was therefore undertaken (1) to determine the efficiency of RAPD and ISSR markers for estimating the genetic diversity and (2) to estimate the genetic diversity of canola genotypes based on molecular characterization. For this purpose, 10 canola (Brassica napus L.) genotypes were analyzed and the results of genetic distances estimated by ISSR and RAPD markers were compared." @default.
• W2525050063 created "2016-10-07" @default.
• W2525050063 creator A5081201577 @default.
• W2525050063 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W2525050063 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2525050063 title "EFFICIENCY OF RAPD AND ISSR MARKERS FOR GENOTYPE FINGERPRINTING AND GENETIC DIVERSITY STUDIES IN CANOLA (Brassica napus)" @default.
• W2525050063 cites W1549872731 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W1555248226 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W1571738154 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W179464430 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W1963953102 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W1984280691 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W2009000410 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W2014419770 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W2032464034 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W2035741400 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W2045594695 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W2053317771 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W2064039010 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W2070814151 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W2073182556 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W2079182722 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W2095103901 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W2095884801 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W2105274763 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W2109552522 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W2140145031 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W2153382033 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W2171114940 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W2196906092 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W229024373 @default.
• W2525050063 cites W242011041 @default.
• W2525050063 doi "https://doi.org/10.21608/ejgc.2011.11040" @default.
• W2525050063 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2525050063 type Work @default.
• W2525050063 sameAs 2525050063 @default.
• W2525050063 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2525050063 countsByYear W25250500632016 @default.
• W2525050063 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2525050063 hasAuthorship W2525050063A5081201577 @default.
• W2525050063 hasBestOaLocation W25250500631 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConcept C135763542 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConcept C150903083 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConcept C190789776 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConcept C2776747608 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConcept C2779223168 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConcept C2779726014 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConcept C552990157 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConcept C79386861 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConcept C81977670 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConcept C84623179 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConceptScore W2525050063C104317684 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConceptScore W2525050063C135763542 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConceptScore W2525050063C144024400 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConceptScore W2525050063C149923435 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConceptScore W2525050063C150903083 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConceptScore W2525050063C190789776 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConceptScore W2525050063C2776747608 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConceptScore W2525050063C2779223168 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConceptScore W2525050063C2779726014 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConceptScore W2525050063C2908647359 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConceptScore W2525050063C54355233 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConceptScore W2525050063C552990157 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConceptScore W2525050063C59822182 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConceptScore W2525050063C79386861 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConceptScore W2525050063C81977670 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConceptScore W2525050063C84623179 @default.
• W2525050063 hasConceptScore W2525050063C86803240 @default.
• W2525050063 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2525050063 hasLocation W25250500631 @default.
• W2525050063 hasOpenAccess W2525050063 @default.
• W2525050063 hasPrimaryLocation W25250500631 @default.
• W2525050063 hasRelatedWork W1021562551 @default.
• W2525050063 hasRelatedWork W1509155184 @default.
• W2525050063 hasRelatedWork W2018363656 @default.
• W2525050063 hasRelatedWork W2157502393 @default.
• W2525050063 hasRelatedWork W2362791809 @default.
• W2525050063 hasRelatedWork W2378114972 @default.
• W2525050063 hasRelatedWork W2485287384 @default.
• W2525050063 hasRelatedWork W2525050063 @default.
• W2525050063 hasRelatedWork W3090025912 @default.
• W2525050063 hasRelatedWork W2184337389 @default.
• W2525050063 hasVolume "40" @default.
• W2525050063 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2525050063 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2525050063 magId "2525050063" @default.
• W2525050063 workType "article" @default.