Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2525162812> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 86 of
86
with 100 items per page.
- W2525162812 endingPage "672" @default.
- W2525162812 startingPage "665" @default.
- W2525162812 abstract "Objective/BackgroundHemodynamic measurements of blood flow in the common femoral vein and artery can be performed readily using duplex sonography. The ratio of venous to arterial volume flow in these vessels, the venous arterial flow index (VAFI), is increased in patients with varicose veins and/or chronic venous disease. The objective was to determine the reproducibility of sonographically measured hemodynamic flow parameters using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).MethodsBased on hemodynamic volume flow measurements from the common femoral vein and artery the VAFI was calculated in seven patients with varicose veins (C2, Ep, As, Pr) and 32 healthy controls using standard duplex sonography and MRI.ResultsBased on duplex sonography, the average VAFI (VAFI_d) was 1.05 ± 0.17. The same ratio, using MRI (VAFI_mri) was 1.05 ± 0.19. There was a significant correlation between the VAFI_d and the VAFI_MRI (p = .0021). In patients with venous disease, the average VAFI_d and VAFI_mri were 1.36 ± 0.21 and 1.36 ± 0.20, respectively. In contrast, in the healthy cohort the VAFI_d was 1.00 ± 0.12 and the VAFI_mri measured 1.01 ± 0.15. As expected, there was a significant difference between the VAFI measured in those with venous disease when compared with that of healthy controls (p < .0001).ConclusionThere is a significant correlation between the VAFI measured using sonography and MRI. The study confirmed the elevation of VAFI in patients with chronic venous disease. Hemodynamic measurements of blood flow in the common femoral vein and artery can be performed readily using duplex sonography. The ratio of venous to arterial volume flow in these vessels, the venous arterial flow index (VAFI), is increased in patients with varicose veins and/or chronic venous disease. The objective was to determine the reproducibility of sonographically measured hemodynamic flow parameters using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Based on hemodynamic volume flow measurements from the common femoral vein and artery the VAFI was calculated in seven patients with varicose veins (C2, Ep, As, Pr) and 32 healthy controls using standard duplex sonography and MRI. Based on duplex sonography, the average VAFI (VAFI_d) was 1.05 ± 0.17. The same ratio, using MRI (VAFI_mri) was 1.05 ± 0.19. There was a significant correlation between the VAFI_d and the VAFI_MRI (p = .0021). In patients with venous disease, the average VAFI_d and VAFI_mri were 1.36 ± 0.21 and 1.36 ± 0.20, respectively. In contrast, in the healthy cohort the VAFI_d was 1.00 ± 0.12 and the VAFI_mri measured 1.01 ± 0.15. As expected, there was a significant difference between the VAFI measured in those with venous disease when compared with that of healthy controls (p < .0001). There is a significant correlation between the VAFI measured using sonography and MRI. The study confirmed the elevation of VAFI in patients with chronic venous disease." @default.
- W2525162812 created "2016-10-07" @default.
- W2525162812 creator A5044746555 @default.
- W2525162812 creator A5076992599 @default.
- W2525162812 creator A5079503361 @default.
- W2525162812 creator A5083092616 @default.
- W2525162812 creator A5087513808 @default.
- W2525162812 date "2016-11-01" @default.
- W2525162812 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
- W2525162812 title "Are Sonographically Measured Vascular Haemodynamic Parameters Reproducible Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging?" @default.
- W2525162812 cites W1616098590 @default.
- W2525162812 cites W1664566016 @default.
- W2525162812 cites W2013010190 @default.
- W2525162812 cites W2030447763 @default.
- W2525162812 cites W2074618822 @default.
- W2525162812 cites W2082224498 @default.
- W2525162812 cites W2100082339 @default.
- W2525162812 cites W2107389500 @default.
- W2525162812 cites W2109172173 @default.
- W2525162812 cites W2121243379 @default.
- W2525162812 cites W2148032838 @default.
- W2525162812 cites W2167468795 @default.
- W2525162812 cites W2214369581 @default.
- W2525162812 cites W2253946212 @default.
- W2525162812 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.08.004" @default.
- W2525162812 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27687640" @default.
- W2525162812 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W2525162812 type Work @default.
- W2525162812 sameAs 2525162812 @default.
- W2525162812 citedByCount "9" @default.
- W2525162812 countsByYear W25251628122016 @default.
- W2525162812 countsByYear W25251628122017 @default.
- W2525162812 countsByYear W25251628122019 @default.
- W2525162812 countsByYear W25251628122020 @default.
- W2525162812 countsByYear W25251628122021 @default.
- W2525162812 countsByYear W25251628122022 @default.
- W2525162812 countsByYear W25251628122023 @default.
- W2525162812 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2525162812 hasAuthorship W2525162812A5044746555 @default.
- W2525162812 hasAuthorship W2525162812A5076992599 @default.
- W2525162812 hasAuthorship W2525162812A5079503361 @default.
- W2525162812 hasAuthorship W2525162812A5083092616 @default.
- W2525162812 hasAuthorship W2525162812A5087513808 @default.
- W2525162812 hasBestOaLocation W25251628121 @default.
- W2525162812 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2525162812 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
- W2525162812 hasConcept C158846371 @default.
- W2525162812 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
- W2525162812 hasConcept C178853913 @default.
- W2525162812 hasConcept C2778854125 @default.
- W2525162812 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
- W2525162812 hasConcept C2781038377 @default.
- W2525162812 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W2525162812 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2525162812 hasConceptScore W2525162812C126838900 @default.
- W2525162812 hasConceptScore W2525162812C143409427 @default.
- W2525162812 hasConceptScore W2525162812C158846371 @default.
- W2525162812 hasConceptScore W2525162812C164705383 @default.
- W2525162812 hasConceptScore W2525162812C178853913 @default.
- W2525162812 hasConceptScore W2525162812C2778854125 @default.
- W2525162812 hasConceptScore W2525162812C2780007028 @default.
- W2525162812 hasConceptScore W2525162812C2781038377 @default.
- W2525162812 hasConceptScore W2525162812C2989005 @default.
- W2525162812 hasConceptScore W2525162812C71924100 @default.
- W2525162812 hasIssue "5" @default.
- W2525162812 hasLocation W25251628121 @default.
- W2525162812 hasLocation W25251628122 @default.
- W2525162812 hasOpenAccess W2525162812 @default.
- W2525162812 hasPrimaryLocation W25251628121 @default.
- W2525162812 hasRelatedWork W195836854 @default.
- W2525162812 hasRelatedWork W1977024184 @default.
- W2525162812 hasRelatedWork W1983622800 @default.
- W2525162812 hasRelatedWork W2008613354 @default.
- W2525162812 hasRelatedWork W2037855954 @default.
- W2525162812 hasRelatedWork W2137007526 @default.
- W2525162812 hasRelatedWork W2143457410 @default.
- W2525162812 hasRelatedWork W2412477484 @default.
- W2525162812 hasRelatedWork W2416895346 @default.
- W2525162812 hasRelatedWork W4205527386 @default.
- W2525162812 hasVolume "52" @default.
- W2525162812 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2525162812 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2525162812 magId "2525162812" @default.
- W2525162812 workType "article" @default.