FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2525386324> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2525386324 endingPage "77" @default.
• W2525386324 startingPage "1" @default.
• W2525386324 abstract "This publication is a systematic Campbell review of the effect of the family therapy approach Family Behavior Therapy (FBT) for treatment for non‐opioid drug use (e.g., cannabis, amphetamine, ecstasy or cocaine) among young people aged 11‐21 years. After a rigorous search for all relevant studies conducted to date, we identified two randomized controlled trials with, respectively, 56 and 26 participants. We used meta‐analysis to synthesize the empirical evidence on the effects of FBT on reduction of drug use frequency, family functioning, and risk behavior. The evidence found was limited, as only two studies with very few participants were included in the data‐analysis. The quality of the evidence is also limited. We were therefore unable to draw any firm conclusion regarding the effectiveness of the treatment. Overall, Family Behavior Therapy for the purpose of treating young people's drug use has not been evaluated with sufficient rigor to unequivocally determine its effectiveness Key messages This publication is a systematic Campbell review of the effect of the family therapy approach Family Behavior Therapy (FBT) for treatment for non‐opioid drug use (e.g., cannabis, amphetamine, ecstasy or cocaine) among young people aged 11‐21 years. Youth drug use is a severe problem worldwide. Recent reports describe concerning trends in the use of drugs by young people and a lack of available treatment. FBT is a manual‐based family therapy approach that seeks to reduce drug use among youth by identifying stimuli and triggers for drug taking, and teaching self‐control and other skills to correct the problem behaviors related to drug use. This approach is based on the therapeutic premise that the family carries a profound influence on child and youth development and that interventions need to be flexible and tailored to the unique characteristics of the families. It is also argued that there is a need for interventions to be problem‐focused, targeting first those patterns of behavior that most directly influence the youth's drug use. After a rigorous search for all relevant studies conducted to date, we identified two randomized controlled trials with, respectively, 56 and 26 participants. We used meta‐analysis to synthesize the empirical evidence on the effects of FBT on reduction of drug use frequency, family functioning, and risk behavior. The findings are as follows: On drug usage: There is no evidence that FBT has an effect on reduction of drug use frequency compared to Individual Cognitive Problem‐Solving (ICPS) and supportive counseling (SC). On family functioning: FBT may improve family functioning as reported by parents compared to Individual Cognitive Problem‐Solving (ICPS) and supportive counseling (SC). There is no evidence that FBT has an effect on family functioning as reported by youth compared to Individual Cognitive Problem‐Solving (ICPS) and supportive counseling (SC). On risk behavior: There is no evidence that FBT has an effect on risk behavior compared to Individual Cognitive Problem‐Solving (ICPS) and supportive counseling (SC). The evidence found was limited, as only two studies with very few participants were included in the data‐analysis. The quality of the evidence is also limited. We were therefore unable to draw any firm conclusion regarding the effectiveness of the treatment. Overall, Family Behavior Therapy for the purpose of treating young people's drug use has not been evaluated with sufficient rigor to unequivocally determine its effectiveness. Executive summary/Abstract BACKGROUND Youth drug use is a severe problem worldwide, and the use of cannabis, amphetamine ecstasy and cocaine, referred to as non‐opioid drugs, are strongly associated with a range of health and social problems. This review focuses on Family Behavior Therapy (FBT) as a treatment for young people who misuse non‐opioid drugs. FBT is a manual‐based family therapy approach. The program is behavior and skill‐oriented. It is concerned with identifying psychological and situational stimuli and triggers presumed to be directly related to the youth's drug use, and skills training to improve self‐control. FBT is designed to accommodate diverse populations of youth with a variety of behavioral, cultural and individual preferences. FBT incorporates behavioral theory (reduction of undesired behavior by manipulating external reinforcement), structural family theory (in which the structure of the family influence the youth's behavior) and strategic family theory (where treatment methods are problem‐focused and pragmatic). OBJECTIVES The main objective of this review is to evaluate the current evidence on the effects of FBT on reduction of drug use frequency for young people in outpatient treatment for non‐opioid drug use and, if possible, to examine moderators of drug use reduction effects, specifically analyzing whether FBT works better for particular types of participants. SEARCH STRATEGY A relatively narrow search strategy to identify qualifying studies was performed. A wide range of electronic bibliographic databases were searched along with government and policy databanks, grey literature databases, citations in other reviews and in the included primary studies, hand searches of relevant journals, and Internet searches using Google. We also corresponded with researchers in the FBT field. Neither language nor date restrictions were applied to the searches. SELECTION CRITERIA Studies eligible for inclusion in the review are required to meet several eligibility criteria. Studies must: have involved a manual‐based FBT treatment for young people aged 11‐21 years enrolled in outpatient treatment for non‐opioid drug use; have used experimental, quasi‐experimental or non‐randomized controlled designs; have reported at least one eligible outcome variable measuring abstinence, reduction of drug use, family functioning, education or vocational involvement, retention, risk behavior or any other adverse effects; not have focused exclusively on treating mental disorders; and have had FBT as the primary intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS The literature search yielded a total of 10,779 records which were screened for eligibility based on title and abstract. 99 potentially relevant records were retrieved and screened in full text, of which 7 studies were potentially relevant. Of these, two studies were data‐extracted by the authors and included in the review. Meta‐analysis was performed to examine the effects of FBT on drug use reduction, family functioning and risk behavior. RESULTS For the primary outcome of reduction in drug use frequency, measured at end of treatment, the standardized mean difference was 0.49 (95% CI ‐0.51, 1.50). At 12 month post‐intake, Azrin et al. (2001) found no statistically significant difference between FBT and the comparison treatment, SMD=‐0.03 (95% CI ‐0.58, 0.52). For family functioning, measured at end of treatment, the standardized mean difference was 0.58 (95% CI 0.02, 1.13) reported by parents and 0.29 (95% CI ‐0.72, 1.30) reported by youth. At 12 month post‐intake, Azrin et al. (2001) found no statistically significant difference between FBT and the comparison treatment for parent satisfaction or youth satisfaction with family functioning, SMD= ‐0.30 (95% CI ‐0.86, 0.26) and SMD= 0.47 (95% CI ‐0.09, 1.04). For risk behavior, measured at end of treatment, the standardized mean difference was 0.29 (95% CI ‐0.16, 0.74). At 12 month post‐intake, Azrin et al. (2001) finds a statistically significant difference that favors the comparison treatment, SMD= ‐0.56 (95% CI ‐1.13, 0.00). Meta‐analysis was not possible for the education outcomes as the measures are incomparable. None of the studies reported statistically significant effect sizes for school outcomes. Due to lack of data for the number randomized in both studies it is not possible to report effects for retention. No other adverse effects are reported in the studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The main conclusion of the review is that there is a lack of firm evidence on the effect of FBT. There is a need for more research, and particularly a need for more methodologically rigorous studies in the field of treatment for young drug users. The aim of this systematic review is to explore what is known about the effectiveness of FBT for the purpose of reducing youth drug use, in order to contribute to an evidence‐based approach in the treatment of young non‐opioid drug users. The evidence found does not provide a basis for drawing conclusions about actual outcomes and impacts. Consequently, no substantive conclusion about the effectiveness can be made, resulting in neither support nor rejection of the present FBT treatment approach." @default.
• W2525386324 created "2016-10-07" @default.
• W2525386324 creator A5016540182 @default.
• W2525386324 creator A5025399865 @default.
• W2525386324 creator A5043226360 @default.
• W2525386324 creator A5044469248 @default.
• W2525386324 creator A5070858750 @default.
• W2525386324 creator A5075287816 @default.
• W2525386324 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W2525386324 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2525386324 title "Family Behavior Therapy (FBT) for Young People in Treatment for Non‐opioid Drug Use: A Systematic Review" @default.
• W2525386324 cites W1475474724 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W1546223597 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W1598602811 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W1601032448 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W181019870 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W1909810964 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W1972420079 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W1983386889 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2019189834 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2023027612 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2023184025 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2024374498 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2029876379 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2045771145 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2048816681 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2054418977 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2055295785 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2070812814 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2088899068 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2094447569 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2100061623 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2100535135 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W21050565 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2107813221 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2111016954 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2111453436 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2113486005 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2125167910 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2125435699 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2130646194 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2135214581 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2146588468 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2154503047 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2158728777 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W239515812 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2781424408 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2786621416 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W2906969871 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W4235634678 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W4254175311 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W4255396331 @default.
• W2525386324 cites W952428096 @default.
• W2525386324 doi "https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2015.9" @default.
• W2525386324 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2525386324 type Work @default.
• W2525386324 sameAs 2525386324 @default.
• W2525386324 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2525386324 countsByYear W25253863242019 @default.
• W2525386324 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2525386324 hasAuthorship W2525386324A5016540182 @default.
• W2525386324 hasAuthorship W2525386324A5025399865 @default.
• W2525386324 hasAuthorship W2525386324A5043226360 @default.
• W2525386324 hasAuthorship W2525386324A5044469248 @default.
• W2525386324 hasAuthorship W2525386324A5070858750 @default.
• W2525386324 hasAuthorship W2525386324A5075287816 @default.
• W2525386324 hasBestOaLocation W25253863241 @default.
• W2525386324 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2525386324 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2525386324 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2525386324 hasConcept C170493617 @default.
• W2525386324 hasConcept C2780035454 @default.
• W2525386324 hasConcept C2781063702 @default.
• W2525386324 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W2525386324 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2525386324 hasConceptScore W2525386324C118552586 @default.
• W2525386324 hasConceptScore W2525386324C126322002 @default.
• W2525386324 hasConceptScore W2525386324C15744967 @default.
• W2525386324 hasConceptScore W2525386324C170493617 @default.
• W2525386324 hasConceptScore W2525386324C2780035454 @default.
• W2525386324 hasConceptScore W2525386324C2781063702 @default.
• W2525386324 hasConceptScore W2525386324C542102704 @default.
• W2525386324 hasConceptScore W2525386324C71924100 @default.
• W2525386324 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2525386324 hasLocation W25253863241 @default.
• W2525386324 hasLocation W25253863242 @default.
• W2525386324 hasLocation W25253863243 @default.
• W2525386324 hasOpenAccess W2525386324 @default.
• W2525386324 hasPrimaryLocation W25253863241 @default.
• W2525386324 hasRelatedWork W1970375414 @default.
• W2525386324 hasRelatedWork W1988207302 @default.
• W2525386324 hasRelatedWork W2020885388 @default.
• W2525386324 hasRelatedWork W2044032703 @default.
• W2525386324 hasRelatedWork W2362169642 @default.
• W2525386324 hasRelatedWork W2604825721 @default.
• W2525386324 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2525386324 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2525386324 hasRelatedWork W2921338709 @default.

• next