FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W252654893> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W252654893 endingPage "259" @default.
• W252654893 startingPage "246" @default.
• W252654893 abstract "Research ProblemWhen I was teaching in high school, many of my students went off to study at elite colleges1 around the country. Those students often returned - full of wonder, pain, excitement - to share tales of their first-year experiences. And throughout my many years teaching foundation drawing, painting, and design - in a community college, a private liberal arts college, a large public university, as well as in a top-rated private college - my undergraduates confided in me as they struggled to make sense of their encounters with college level studio instruction. Later, when I taught education courses at an college, students related discoveries they had made during their first year as they bridged high school and school. And when I led Master's of Fine Arts seminars in college studio pedagogy, the students, who were at the same time employed as graduate assistants in firstyear studio classes, reflected on their own education and discussed their observations of teaching and learning in the first-year studio courses in which they were assisting.This anecdotal data suggested that, while disconnects occurred at many levels of postsecondary education, challenges to learning were most apparent in the foundation year of college. This led me to wonder: what kinds of teaching and learning take place in the first-year studio classrooms of schools? I, therefore, designed a study intended to illuminate the scope of school pedagogy and the dimensions of school learning - as understood by foundation teachers and foundation-year students. This summary of the study includes a few highlights from the literature review, an outline of the research methodology, a description of teaching and learning, and four quandaries that emerged from the findings. To the extent that the participants in this study represent students, teachers, and content typical of today's foundation studio classes, results from this study, while not generalizable, may indicate what one might expect to find in other post-secondary studio programs.Literature ReviewConsensus in the field has suggested that contemporary schools are educational settings in which creative work takes place2 (Bass & Jacob, 2010; Becker, 1996, 2009; Buckley & Conomos, 2010; EIDahab, Vidokle, & Waldvogel, 2006; Gregg, 2003; Madoff, 2009; Miles, 2005). Though some of today's school students may become professional artists, the central purpose of a contemporary school education is the development of the person as a creative, resourceful individual (Bass & Jacob, 2010; Buckley & Conomos, 2010; Enwezor, Dillemuth, & Rogoff, 2006; Matarasso, 2005). This does not appear to be a new mission for schools; indeed, results from a 1973 study suggested that students' primary reason for attending college was to develop as a person (Madge & Weinberger, 1973). Since that time, there have been four scholarly studies of school teaching and learning, each of which included aspects of the foundation year experience (Bekkala, 1999; Edstrom, 2008; Kushins, 2007; Tavin, Kushins, & Elniski, 2007). These reports explored student artistic development (Bekkala, 1999; Edstrom, 2008) orcurricular restructuring (Kushins, 2007; Tavin, et al., 2007) through surveys, interviews, and observations of studio classrooms.Findings from these studies suggested that first-year students were quick to learn that they no longer had the art star status that often contributed to their sense of identity in high school; in school, there were dozens of young artists just as capable as they (Bekkala, 1 999; Edstrom, 2008). In addition, students unable to handle the self-direction often required by school were considered by some faculty to be unfit to become artists - so rather than work to support less successful students, they stood by as students struggled and failed (Edstrom, 2008). …" @default.
• W252654893 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W252654893 creator A5078598380 @default.
• W252654893 date "2013-04-01" @default.
• W252654893 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W252654893 title "Laying a Foundation for Artmaking in the 21st Century: A Description and Some Dilemmas" @default.
• W252654893 cites W1592668203 @default.
• W252654893 cites W2008471736 @default.
• W252654893 cites W2069557811 @default.
• W252654893 cites W2083188378 @default.
• W252654893 cites W2141056334 @default.
• W252654893 cites W219252985 @default.
• W252654893 cites W259494142 @default.
• W252654893 cites W321574749 @default.
• W252654893 cites W4213246769 @default.
• W252654893 cites W4236629789 @default.
• W252654893 cites W4240600820 @default.
• W252654893 cites W4245787722 @default.
• W252654893 cites W4251105487 @default.
• W252654893 cites W4251892615 @default.
• W252654893 cites W88551293 @default.
• W252654893 cites W89085168 @default.
• W252654893 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2013.11518897" @default.
• W252654893 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W252654893 type Work @default.
• W252654893 sameAs 252654893 @default.
• W252654893 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W252654893 countsByYear W2526548932013 @default.
• W252654893 countsByYear W2526548932014 @default.
• W252654893 countsByYear W2526548932015 @default.
• W252654893 countsByYear W2526548932016 @default.
• W252654893 countsByYear W2526548932017 @default.
• W252654893 countsByYear W2526548932020 @default.
• W252654893 countsByYear W2526548932021 @default.
• W252654893 countsByYear W2526548932022 @default.
• W252654893 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W252654893 hasAuthorship W252654893A5078598380 @default.
• W252654893 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W252654893 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W252654893 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W252654893 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W252654893 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W252654893 hasConcept C2780966255 @default.
• W252654893 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W252654893 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W252654893 hasConceptScore W252654893C138885662 @default.
• W252654893 hasConceptScore W252654893C142362112 @default.
• W252654893 hasConceptScore W252654893C144024400 @default.
• W252654893 hasConceptScore W252654893C153349607 @default.
• W252654893 hasConceptScore W252654893C166957645 @default.
• W252654893 hasConceptScore W252654893C2780966255 @default.
• W252654893 hasConceptScore W252654893C52119013 @default.
• W252654893 hasConceptScore W252654893C95457728 @default.
• W252654893 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W252654893 hasLocation W2526548931 @default.
• W252654893 hasOpenAccess W252654893 @default.
• W252654893 hasPrimaryLocation W2526548931 @default.
• W252654893 hasRelatedWork W163049555 @default.
• W252654893 hasRelatedWork W1656273795 @default.
• W252654893 hasRelatedWork W2051573346 @default.
• W252654893 hasRelatedWork W2275196185 @default.
• W252654893 hasRelatedWork W2461474427 @default.
• W252654893 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W252654893 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W252654893 hasRelatedWork W3082257684 @default.
• W252654893 hasRelatedWork W4230623448 @default.
• W252654893 hasRelatedWork W643768068 @default.
• W252654893 hasVolume "54" @default.
• W252654893 isParatext "false" @default.
• W252654893 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W252654893 magId "252654893" @default.
• W252654893 workType "article" @default.