FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2527757349> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2527757349 endingPage "785" @default.
• W2527757349 startingPage "776" @default.
• W2527757349 abstract "Background Accurate and consistent regional lymph node classification is an important element in the staging and multidisciplinary management of lung cancer. Regional lymph node definition sets—lymph node maps—have been created to standardize regional lymph node classification. In 2009, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) introduced a lymph node map to supersede all preexisting lymph node maps. Our aim was to study if and how lung cancer specialists apply the IASLC lymph node map when classifying thoracic lymph nodes encountered on CT scans during lung cancer staging. Methods From April 2013 through July 2013, invitations were distributed to all members of the Fleischner Society, Society of Thoracic Radiology, General Thoracic Surgical Club, and the American Association of Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology to participate in an anonymous online image-based and text-based 20-question survey regarding lymph node classification for lung cancer staging on CT imaging. Results Three hundred thirty-seven people responded (approximately 25% participation). Respondents consisted of self-reported thoracic radiologists (n = 158), thoracic surgeons (n = 102), and pulmonologists who perform endobronchial ultrasonography (n = 77). Half of the respondents (50%; 95% CI, 44%-55%) reported using the IASLC lymph node map in daily practice, with no significant differences between subspecialties. A disparity was observed between the IASLC definition sets and their interpretation and application on CT scans, in particular for lymph nodes near the thoracic inlet, anterior to the trachea, anterior to the tracheal bifurcation, near the ligamentum arteriosum, between the bronchus intermedius and esophagus, in the internal mammary space, and adjacent to the heart. Conclusions Use of older lymph node maps and inconsistencies in interpretation and application of definitions in the IASLC lymph node map may potentially lead to misclassification of stage and suboptimal management of lung cancer in some patients. Accurate and consistent regional lymph node classification is an important element in the staging and multidisciplinary management of lung cancer. Regional lymph node definition sets—lymph node maps—have been created to standardize regional lymph node classification. In 2009, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) introduced a lymph node map to supersede all preexisting lymph node maps. Our aim was to study if and how lung cancer specialists apply the IASLC lymph node map when classifying thoracic lymph nodes encountered on CT scans during lung cancer staging. From April 2013 through July 2013, invitations were distributed to all members of the Fleischner Society, Society of Thoracic Radiology, General Thoracic Surgical Club, and the American Association of Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology to participate in an anonymous online image-based and text-based 20-question survey regarding lymph node classification for lung cancer staging on CT imaging. Three hundred thirty-seven people responded (approximately 25% participation). Respondents consisted of self-reported thoracic radiologists (n = 158), thoracic surgeons (n = 102), and pulmonologists who perform endobronchial ultrasonography (n = 77). Half of the respondents (50%; 95% CI, 44%-55%) reported using the IASLC lymph node map in daily practice, with no significant differences between subspecialties. A disparity was observed between the IASLC definition sets and their interpretation and application on CT scans, in particular for lymph nodes near the thoracic inlet, anterior to the trachea, anterior to the tracheal bifurcation, near the ligamentum arteriosum, between the bronchus intermedius and esophagus, in the internal mammary space, and adjacent to the heart. Use of older lymph node maps and inconsistencies in interpretation and application of definitions in the IASLC lymph node map may potentially lead to misclassification of stage and suboptimal management of lung cancer in some patients." @default.
• W2527757349 created "2016-10-14" @default.
• W2527757349 creator A5003737429 @default.
• W2527757349 creator A5006745366 @default.
• W2527757349 creator A5025720269 @default.
• W2527757349 creator A5051570440 @default.
• W2527757349 creator A5086399744 @default.
• W2527757349 creator A5089185817 @default.
• W2527757349 date "2017-04-01" @default.
• W2527757349 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2527757349 title "Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of Lymph Node Classification in Lung Cancer on CT Scanning" @default.
• W2527757349 cites W1541090799 @default.
• W2527757349 cites W1811130302 @default.
• W2527757349 cites W1880563141 @default.
• W2527757349 cites W2020304366 @default.
• W2527757349 cites W2029177620 @default.
• W2527757349 cites W2040211532 @default.
• W2527757349 cites W2066968134 @default.
• W2527757349 cites W2146653397 @default.
• W2527757349 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.09.016" @default.
• W2527757349 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27713056" @default.
• W2527757349 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2527757349 type Work @default.
• W2527757349 sameAs 2527757349 @default.
• W2527757349 citedByCount "22" @default.
• W2527757349 countsByYear W25277573492015 @default.
• W2527757349 countsByYear W25277573492017 @default.
• W2527757349 countsByYear W25277573492018 @default.
• W2527757349 countsByYear W25277573492019 @default.
• W2527757349 countsByYear W25277573492020 @default.
• W2527757349 countsByYear W25277573492021 @default.
• W2527757349 countsByYear W25277573492022 @default.
• W2527757349 countsByYear W25277573492023 @default.
• W2527757349 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2527757349 hasAuthorship W2527757349A5003737429 @default.
• W2527757349 hasAuthorship W2527757349A5006745366 @default.
• W2527757349 hasAuthorship W2527757349A5025720269 @default.
• W2527757349 hasAuthorship W2527757349A5051570440 @default.
• W2527757349 hasAuthorship W2527757349A5086399744 @default.
• W2527757349 hasAuthorship W2527757349A5089185817 @default.
• W2527757349 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2527757349 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2527757349 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W2527757349 hasConcept C2776256026 @default.
• W2527757349 hasConcept C2779720271 @default.
• W2527757349 hasConcept C2780849966 @default.
• W2527757349 hasConcept C2908861384 @default.
• W2527757349 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2527757349 hasConceptScore W2527757349C126838900 @default.
• W2527757349 hasConceptScore W2527757349C142724271 @default.
• W2527757349 hasConceptScore W2527757349C177713679 @default.
• W2527757349 hasConceptScore W2527757349C2776256026 @default.
• W2527757349 hasConceptScore W2527757349C2779720271 @default.
• W2527757349 hasConceptScore W2527757349C2780849966 @default.
• W2527757349 hasConceptScore W2527757349C2908861384 @default.
• W2527757349 hasConceptScore W2527757349C71924100 @default.
• W2527757349 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2527757349 hasLocation W25277573491 @default.
• W2527757349 hasLocation W25277573492 @default.
• W2527757349 hasOpenAccess W2527757349 @default.
• W2527757349 hasPrimaryLocation W25277573491 @default.
• W2527757349 hasRelatedWork W1967103478 @default.
• W2527757349 hasRelatedWork W2008553569 @default.
• W2527757349 hasRelatedWork W2032912323 @default.
• W2527757349 hasRelatedWork W2372561159 @default.
• W2527757349 hasRelatedWork W2375344515 @default.
• W2527757349 hasRelatedWork W2390152934 @default.
• W2527757349 hasRelatedWork W2610092277 @default.
• W2527757349 hasRelatedWork W3096852753 @default.
• W2527757349 hasRelatedWork W4200527604 @default.
• W2527757349 hasRelatedWork W4313420919 @default.
• W2527757349 hasVolume "151" @default.
• W2527757349 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2527757349 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2527757349 magId "2527757349" @default.
• W2527757349 workType "article" @default.