FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2527788298> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2527788298 endingPage "414" @default.
• W2527788298 startingPage "406" @default.
• W2527788298 abstract "Construct: The impact of using nonbinary checklists for scoring residents from different levels of training participating in objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) progress tests was explored. Background: OSCE progress tests typically employ similar rating instruments as traditional OSCEs. However, progress tests differ from other assessment modalities because learners from different stages of training participate in the same examination, which can pose challenges when deciding how to assign scores. In an attempt to better capture performance, nonbinary checklists were introduced in two OSCE progress tests. The purposes of this study were (a) to identify differences in the use of checklist options (e.g., done satisfactorily, attempted, or not done) by task type, (b) to analyze the impact of different scoring methods using nonbinary checklists for two OSCE progress tests (nonprocedural and procedural) for Internal Medicine residents, and (c) to determine which scoring method is better suited for a given task. Approach: A retrospective analysis examined differences in scores (n = 119) for two OSCE progress tests (procedural and nonprocedural). Scoring methods (hawk, dove, and hybrid) varied in stringency in how they awarded marks for nonbinary checklist items that were rated as done satisfactorily, attempted, or not done. Difficulty, reliability (internal consistency), item-total correlations and pass rates were compared for each OSCE using the three scoring methods. Results: Mean OSCE scores were highest using the dove method and lowest using the hawk method. The hawk method resulted in higher item-total correlations for most stations, but there were differences by task type. Overall score reliability calculated using the three methods did not differ significantly. Pass–fail status differed as a function of scoring methods and exam type, with the hawk and hybrid methods resulting in higher failure rates for the nonprocedural OSCE and the dove method resulting in a higher failure rate for the procedural OSCE. Conclusion: The use of different scoring methods for nonbinary OSCE checklists resulted in differences in mean scores and pass–fail status. The results varied with procedural and nonprocedural OSCEs." @default.
• W2527788298 created "2016-10-14" @default.
• W2527788298 creator A5001258549 @default.
• W2527788298 creator A5015617389 @default.
• W2527788298 creator A5023384917 @default.
• W2527788298 creator A5028015984 @default.
• W2527788298 creator A5074777354 @default.
• W2527788298 date "2016-10-01" @default.
• W2527788298 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2527788298 title "Done or Almost Done? Improving OSCE Checklists to Better Capture Performance in Progress Tests" @default.
• W2527788298 cites W1568374678 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W1685900114 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W1751360006 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W1810330899 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W1979295035 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W1980039051 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W1985936397 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W2002542292 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W2008233978 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W2015336238 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W2024888162 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W2028787956 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W2044059462 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W2045936759 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W2049523735 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W2061275018 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W2061651815 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W2064228794 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W2068757607 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W2079556640 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W2091307601 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W2115065139 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W2159274620 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W2164973508 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W2275436624 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W2283645502 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W2294207898 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W2321707224 @default.
• W2527788298 cites W2589269133 @default.
• W2527788298 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2016.1218337" @default.
• W2527788298 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27700252" @default.
• W2527788298 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2527788298 type Work @default.
• W2527788298 sameAs 2527788298 @default.
• W2527788298 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2527788298 countsByYear W25277882982017 @default.
• W2527788298 countsByYear W25277882982018 @default.
• W2527788298 countsByYear W25277882982020 @default.
• W2527788298 countsByYear W25277882982021 @default.
• W2527788298 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2527788298 hasAuthorship W2527788298A5001258549 @default.
• W2527788298 hasAuthorship W2527788298A5015617389 @default.
• W2527788298 hasAuthorship W2527788298A5023384917 @default.
• W2527788298 hasAuthorship W2527788298A5028015984 @default.
• W2527788298 hasAuthorship W2527788298A5074777354 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConcept C2778000598 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConcept C2780451532 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConcept C49453240 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConceptScore W2527788298C121332964 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConceptScore W2527788298C15744967 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConceptScore W2527788298C162324750 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConceptScore W2527788298C163258240 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConceptScore W2527788298C171606756 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConceptScore W2527788298C180747234 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConceptScore W2527788298C187736073 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConceptScore W2527788298C2778000598 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConceptScore W2527788298C2779356329 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConceptScore W2527788298C2780451532 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConceptScore W2527788298C41008148 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConceptScore W2527788298C43214815 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConceptScore W2527788298C49453240 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConceptScore W2527788298C509550671 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConceptScore W2527788298C62520636 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConceptScore W2527788298C70410870 @default.
• W2527788298 hasConceptScore W2527788298C71924100 @default.
• W2527788298 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2527788298 hasLocation W25277882981 @default.
• W2527788298 hasLocation W25277882982 @default.
• W2527788298 hasOpenAccess W2527788298 @default.
• W2527788298 hasPrimaryLocation W25277882981 @default.
• W2527788298 hasRelatedWork W1929195979 @default.
• W2527788298 hasRelatedWork W1982137724 @default.
• W2527788298 hasRelatedWork W2062455552 @default.
• W2527788298 hasRelatedWork W2069019646 @default.

• next