FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2529238904> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2529238904 endingPage "106" @default.
• W2529238904 startingPage "83" @default.
• W2529238904 abstract "The law of search and seizure is like ivy growing on Canadians’ homes. It should both connect the home to the greater landscape, by providing a means of balancing the rights of individuals against the concerns of the state, and protect the rights of Canadians to enjoy privacy in their own homes. More than any other place, the home is where Canadians can be themselves. Section 8 of the Charter reads: “Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure.” However, the jurisprudential ivy that has sprung from this seed has worked its way into the wood and walls of Canadian homes. Judicial analysis under s. 8 has grown more complex, and Canadians’ expectations that they will enjoy privacy in their own homes have been buried under a thicket of vines and leaves. Some pruning is in order. From the origins of the common law, the home has been a presumptively private place. Sir Edward Coke famously held that “the house of everyone is to him as his castle and fortress, as well for his defence against injury and violence as for his repose.”2 This passage was quoted in R. v. Tessling, but ultimately it was not enough to sway the result of that case. Today in Canada the law of search and seizure presumes that nothing is automatically within the protection of s. 8. The power of the state to search the home is limited only by the existence of a reasonable expectation of privacy (“REP”). Where there is a REP, neither the government nor the police can search for either physical evidence or information without a warrant or some other form of prior judicial authorization. In other words, the law does not recognize that a search has taken place unless there was a REP. However, if there is a REP in a place or in certain information, then whatever was done by the state to gain the information was a search. A search without a warrant is presumptively unreasonable. From the seed of the REP has grown a tangled mass of factors and sub-factors for evaluating the reasonableness of expectations of privacy. A REP is determined by an analysis of all the circumstances. The subjective expectation of the person whose home is searched is only one factor in the analysis. However, the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) has repeatedly held that it can be presumed that Canadians subjectively expect what goes on in their homes to be private. What Canadians actually expect to be private – their homes – and what the REP analysis says they can expect to be private are two very different things. The REP analysis as it stands gives Canadians less privacy than the jurisprudence says they expect. The ivy has come through the windows, but why? Various scholars argue that the REP analysis erodes Canadians’ privacy through circular reasoning, by protecting privacy in a post-facto, case-by-case fashion, and by taking too narrow an approach to the kinds of information that should be kept private. In R. v. Gomboc, a majority of the Alberta Court of Appeal held that the data gathered by placing a digital recording ammeter (“DRA”) on the accused’s power line was subject to a REP, with O’Brien J.A. dissenting. The Crown appealed to the SCC as of right, and the appeal will tentatively be heard on May 19, 2010. The majority of the Court of the Appeal implicitly presumed that there is a REP in the home. This presumption should be adopted as part of the law of search and seizure, because it answers each of the scholarly critiques and, more importantly, because it closes the gap between the privacy Canadians expect and the privacy the law gives them." @default.
• W2529238904 created "2016-10-14" @default.
• W2529238904 creator A5020131100 @default.
• W2529238904 date "2010-05-01" @default.
• W2529238904 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2529238904 title "Pulling the Ivy Out of the Windows: Presumptions of Privacy in the Home and R. v. Gomboc" @default.
• W2529238904 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2529238904 type Work @default.
• W2529238904 sameAs 2529238904 @default.
• W2529238904 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2529238904 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2529238904 hasAuthorship W2529238904A5020131100 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConcept C102938260 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConcept C123201435 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConcept C141972696 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConcept C2777596936 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConcept C2778910426 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConcept C2780262971 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConcept C69775031 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConceptScore W2529238904C10138342 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConceptScore W2529238904C102938260 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConceptScore W2529238904C11413529 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConceptScore W2529238904C121332964 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConceptScore W2529238904C123201435 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConceptScore W2529238904C141972696 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConceptScore W2529238904C144024400 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConceptScore W2529238904C144133560 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConceptScore W2529238904C163258240 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConceptScore W2529238904C17744445 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConceptScore W2529238904C182306322 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConceptScore W2529238904C199539241 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConceptScore W2529238904C2777596936 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConceptScore W2529238904C2778272461 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConceptScore W2529238904C2778910426 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConceptScore W2529238904C2780262971 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConceptScore W2529238904C41008148 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConceptScore W2529238904C48103436 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConceptScore W2529238904C62520636 @default.
• W2529238904 hasConceptScore W2529238904C69775031 @default.
• W2529238904 hasLocation W25292389041 @default.
• W2529238904 hasOpenAccess W2529238904 @default.
• W2529238904 hasPrimaryLocation W25292389041 @default.
• W2529238904 hasRelatedWork W1163744933 @default.
• W2529238904 hasRelatedWork W1545913736 @default.
• W2529238904 hasRelatedWork W214362715 @default.
• W2529238904 hasRelatedWork W232750040 @default.
• W2529238904 hasRelatedWork W256498343 @default.
• W2529238904 hasRelatedWork W2594842572 @default.
• W2529238904 hasRelatedWork W2615170025 @default.
• W2529238904 hasRelatedWork W2620779592 @default.
• W2529238904 hasRelatedWork W2735715655 @default.
• W2529238904 hasRelatedWork W2752778857 @default.
• W2529238904 hasRelatedWork W3125694627 @default.
• W2529238904 hasRelatedWork W39989062 @default.
• W2529238904 hasRelatedWork W62516200 @default.
• W2529238904 hasRelatedWork W638205405 @default.
• W2529238904 hasRelatedWork W746103931 @default.
• W2529238904 hasRelatedWork W77032805 @default.
• W2529238904 hasRelatedWork W2163062420 @default.
• W2529238904 hasRelatedWork W2774228158 @default.
• W2529238904 hasRelatedWork W3122833565 @default.
• W2529238904 hasRelatedWork W3125927685 @default.
• W2529238904 hasVolume "19" @default.
• W2529238904 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2529238904 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2529238904 magId "2529238904" @default.
• W2529238904 workType "article" @default.