FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2530417529> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2530417529 endingPage "882" @default.
• W2530417529 startingPage "880" @default.
• W2530417529 abstract "Despite an absence of level I data suggesting a survival benefit, interest in radical prostatectomy (RP) for patients with metastatic prostate cancer (PC) is rising (1). Tradi-tionally, RP has been reserved for clinically localized PC, and good outcomes have been demonstrated in this population (2). While both retrospective and observational studies have reported improved survival outcomes for patients with metastatic (M1) disease who undergo primary tumor treatment relative to androgen deprivation therapy alone (1, 3), prospective data – particularly for surgery – is sparse. It would be unwise, then, to pre-maturely extrapolate these results to patients with metastatic disease until the merits of such an approach are carefully considered.For the purposes of this discussion, we will consider metastatic disease to en-compass both clinically node positive (cN1) and traditional metastatic (cM1) disease (4). There are no randomized trials exploring the role of RP in the cN1 setting. Thus, we are limited to retrospective analyses to inform treatment decisions. Though the relevance of the distinction has been recently questioned (5), the majority of these studies are compri-sed of patients with occult nodal disease (i.e. clinically unapparent and discovered at the time of radical prostatectomy) rather than clinical node positive disease (i.e. > 1cm nodes identified on pre-operative imaging studies). A German group looked at patients with cT1-3, N1-2, M0 prostate cancer who underwent pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT, group 1) versus RP+PLND+ADT (group 2) (6). Biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, overall survival (OS), and prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM) favored performance of RP. Unfortunately, marked differences in stage and grade also favored the RP group, thereby limiting the generalizability of these results. Similarly, Grimm and colleagues evaluated patients with node-positive PC who either underwent RP+ADT or ADT alone and demonstrated improved BCR-free sur-vival and PCSM in the RP group (7). However, the group that was not selected for surgery had greater number of positive lymph nodes relative to the RP group, again highlighting selection biases inherent to this study design. In an attempt to account for these diffe-rences between groups, Ghavamian et al. matched 79 pN+ patients who underwent PLND and early adjuvant orchiectomy to 79 pN+ patients who underwent RP with PLND on the following parameters: number of positive nodes, clinical grade, clinical stage, patient" @default.
• W2530417529 created "2016-10-21" @default.
• W2530417529 creator A5080057051 @default.
• W2530417529 creator A5090747712 @default.
• W2530417529 date "2016-10-01" @default.
• W2530417529 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2530417529 title "Radical prostatectomy in metastatic prostate cancer: is there enough evidence? | Opinion: No" @default.
• W2530417529 cites W111083711 @default.
• W2530417529 cites W1556926668 @default.
• W2530417529 cites W1568447589 @default.
• W2530417529 cites W1863663559 @default.
• W2530417529 cites W1968794317 @default.
• W2530417529 cites W1975323370 @default.
• W2530417529 cites W1985213644 @default.
• W2530417529 cites W1987660792 @default.
• W2530417529 cites W2001933720 @default.
• W2530417529 cites W2021256410 @default.
• W2530417529 cites W2062187131 @default.
• W2530417529 cites W2063695656 @default.
• W2530417529 cites W2071811128 @default.
• W2530417529 cites W2073365051 @default.
• W2530417529 cites W2147509995 @default.
• W2530417529 cites W2256699687 @default.
• W2530417529 cites W2347114208 @default.
• W2530417529 cites W2408946761 @default.
• W2530417529 cites W2462273439 @default.
• W2530417529 cites W2501712293 @default.
• W2530417529 cites W2597872842 @default.
• W2530417529 doi "https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.05.05" @default.
• W2530417529 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5066883" @default.
• W2530417529 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27716457" @default.
• W2530417529 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2530417529 type Work @default.
• W2530417529 sameAs 2530417529 @default.
• W2530417529 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2530417529 countsByYear W25304175292018 @default.
• W2530417529 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2530417529 hasAuthorship W2530417529A5080057051 @default.
• W2530417529 hasAuthorship W2530417529A5090747712 @default.
• W2530417529 hasBestOaLocation W25304175291 @default.
• W2530417529 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2530417529 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2530417529 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W2530417529 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W2530417529 hasConcept C2779466945 @default.
• W2530417529 hasConcept C2780192828 @default.
• W2530417529 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2530417529 hasConceptScore W2530417529C121608353 @default.
• W2530417529 hasConceptScore W2530417529C126322002 @default.
• W2530417529 hasConceptScore W2530417529C126894567 @default.
• W2530417529 hasConceptScore W2530417529C143998085 @default.
• W2530417529 hasConceptScore W2530417529C2779466945 @default.
• W2530417529 hasConceptScore W2530417529C2780192828 @default.
• W2530417529 hasConceptScore W2530417529C71924100 @default.
• W2530417529 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2530417529 hasLocation W25304175291 @default.
• W2530417529 hasLocation W25304175292 @default.
• W2530417529 hasLocation W25304175293 @default.
• W2530417529 hasLocation W25304175294 @default.
• W2530417529 hasLocation W25304175295 @default.
• W2530417529 hasOpenAccess W2530417529 @default.
• W2530417529 hasPrimaryLocation W25304175291 @default.
• W2530417529 hasRelatedWork W1967410728 @default.
• W2530417529 hasRelatedWork W2015977774 @default.
• W2530417529 hasRelatedWork W2068509057 @default.
• W2530417529 hasRelatedWork W2078797104 @default.
• W2530417529 hasRelatedWork W2111952090 @default.
• W2530417529 hasRelatedWork W2169120358 @default.
• W2530417529 hasRelatedWork W2395453437 @default.
• W2530417529 hasRelatedWork W2402249956 @default.
• W2530417529 hasRelatedWork W2559494340 @default.
• W2530417529 hasRelatedWork W3150909901 @default.
• W2530417529 hasVolume "42" @default.
• W2530417529 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2530417529 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2530417529 magId "2530417529" @default.
• W2530417529 workType "article" @default.