FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2530874920> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2530874920 abstract "Society's need for computer literate citizens demands that colleges and universities prepare graduates with appropriate computer knowledge and skills to survive in the digital workplace. Faced with faculty shortages and declining budgets, higher education must deliver a one-size-fits-all introductory computing course to students arriving on campuses with well-developed skill sets, the latest wireless devices, and expectations of a wired campus. Traditional lecture and hands-on instruction may no longer be an appropriate method of teaching introductory computing courses. This study investigated the feasibility of using self-paced, computer-based instruction (CBI) to teach an introductory computing course. The goals of the study were (1) to determine if there were significant differences in the final learning outcomes of students subjected to CBI models and those of students who experienced traditional instructional models of lecture and hands-on practice, and (2) to determine if students matriculating from larger high schools performed differently than students from smaller high schools in introductory courses regardless of the method of instruction. Data were collected from an introductory computing course taught at a medium-size university in the Midwest over a period of three academic semesters. A quasi-experimental nonequivalent control group design was appropriate for the study. Random assignment of participants is lacking in the design and analysis of variance was appropriate to determine if significant differences existed in the mean ACT scores of participants in the six groups. Statistically non-significant differences were noted from the ANOVA and the data from individual semesters were combined to form one control and one treatment group. ANOVA indicated no significant differences in the final learning outcomes of participants regardless of the instructional method and indicates that the CBI model was as effective as traditional teaching models. Likewise, no significant differences in learning outcomes of students matriculating from larger and smaller high schools existed. Technology gives students the confidence and responsibility to take an active part in their learning experiences. Allowing students to learn at their own pace, in their own time can reduce budgetary pressures on university resources. Additional studies of computer-based instructional models merit consideration for continuous improvement of introductory computing courses." @default.
• W2530874920 created "2016-10-21" @default.
• W2530874920 creator A5070820157 @default.
• W2530874920 creator A5090564101 @default.
• W2530874920 date "2006-01-01" @default.
• W2530874920 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2530874920 title "Re-designing a university introductory computing course using computer-based instruction and assessment" @default.
• W2530874920 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2530874920 type Work @default.
• W2530874920 sameAs 2530874920 @default.
• W2530874920 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2530874920 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2530874920 hasAuthorship W2530874920A5070820157 @default.
• W2530874920 hasAuthorship W2530874920A5090564101 @default.
• W2530874920 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2530874920 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2530874920 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2530874920 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2530874920 hasConcept C194051981 @default.
• W2530874920 hasConcept C2775924081 @default.
• W2530874920 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2530874920 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2530874920 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2530874920 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2530874920 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2530874920 hasConceptScore W2530874920C138885662 @default.
• W2530874920 hasConceptScore W2530874920C145420912 @default.
• W2530874920 hasConceptScore W2530874920C154945302 @default.
• W2530874920 hasConceptScore W2530874920C15744967 @default.
• W2530874920 hasConceptScore W2530874920C194051981 @default.
• W2530874920 hasConceptScore W2530874920C2775924081 @default.
• W2530874920 hasConceptScore W2530874920C2778137410 @default.
• W2530874920 hasConceptScore W2530874920C41008148 @default.
• W2530874920 hasConceptScore W2530874920C41895202 @default.
• W2530874920 hasConceptScore W2530874920C509550671 @default.
• W2530874920 hasConceptScore W2530874920C71924100 @default.
• W2530874920 hasLocation W25308749201 @default.
• W2530874920 hasOpenAccess W2530874920 @default.
• W2530874920 hasPrimaryLocation W25308749201 @default.
• W2530874920 hasRelatedWork W1554596578 @default.
• W2530874920 hasRelatedWork W1603161946 @default.
• W2530874920 hasRelatedWork W171434923 @default.
• W2530874920 hasRelatedWork W1768830413 @default.
• W2530874920 hasRelatedWork W1981248416 @default.
• W2530874920 hasRelatedWork W2024276475 @default.
• W2530874920 hasRelatedWork W2089512189 @default.
• W2530874920 hasRelatedWork W2101543618 @default.
• W2530874920 hasRelatedWork W2102322310 @default.
• W2530874920 hasRelatedWork W212895287 @default.
• W2530874920 hasRelatedWork W2185453367 @default.
• W2530874920 hasRelatedWork W2276676701 @default.
• W2530874920 hasRelatedWork W2328779280 @default.
• W2530874920 hasRelatedWork W2519373506 @default.
• W2530874920 hasRelatedWork W261920687 @default.
• W2530874920 hasRelatedWork W2766019110 @default.
• W2530874920 hasRelatedWork W2915922639 @default.
• W2530874920 hasRelatedWork W50220560 @default.
• W2530874920 hasRelatedWork W2376396627 @default.
• W2530874920 hasRelatedWork W2558350192 @default.
• W2530874920 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2530874920 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2530874920 magId "2530874920" @default.
• W2530874920 workType "article" @default.