FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2531465624> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2531465624 endingPage "129" @default.
• W2531465624 startingPage "120" @default.
• W2531465624 abstract "Providing nursing teams with feedback on quality measurements is used as a quality improvement instrument in healthcare organizations worldwide. Previous research indicated contradictory results regarding the effect of such feedback on both nurses' well-being and performance.Building on the Job Demands-Resources model this study explores: (1) whether and how nurses' perceptions of feedback on quality measurements (as a burdening job demand or rather as an intrinsically or extrinsically motivating job resource) are respectively related to nurses' well-being and performance; and (2) whether and how team reflection influences nurses' perceptions.An embedded case study.Four surgical wards within three different acute teaching-hospital settings in the Netherlands.During a period of four months, the nurses on each ward were provided with similar feedback on quality measurements. After this period, interviews with eight nurses and the ward manager for each ward were conducted. Additionally, observational data were collected from three oral feedback moments on each of the participating wards.The data revealed that individual nurses perceive the same feedback on quality measurements differently, leading to different effects on nurses' well-being and performance: 1) feedback can be perceived as a job demand that pressures nurses to improve the results on the quality measurements; 2) feedback can be perceived as an extrinsically motivating job resource, that is instrumental to improve the results on quality measurements; 3) feedback can be perceived as an intrinsically motivating job resource that stimulates nurses to improve the results on the quality measurements; and 4) feedback can be perceived neither as a job demand, nor as a job resource, and has no effect on nurses' well-being and performance. Additionally, this study indicates that team reflection after feedback seems to be very low in practice, while our data also provides evidence that nursing teams using the feedback to jointly reflect and analyse their performance and strategies will be able to better translate information about quality measurements into corrective behaviours, which may result in more positive perceptions of feedback on quality measurements among individual nurses.To better understand the impact of feedback to nursing teams on quality measurements, we should take nurses' individual perceptions of this feedback into account. Supporting nursing teams in team reflection after them having received feedback on quality measurements may help in eliciting positive perceptions among nurses, and therewith create positive effects of feedback on both their well-being and performance." @default.
• W2531465624 created "2016-10-21" @default.
• W2531465624 creator A5020802274 @default.
• W2531465624 creator A5022119399 @default.
• W2531465624 creator A5046552958 @default.
• W2531465624 creator A5061427752 @default.
• W2531465624 creator A5080482065 @default.
• W2531465624 date "2016-12-01" @default.
• W2531465624 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2531465624 title "Nurses’ perceptions of feedback to nursing teams on quality measurements: An embedded case study design" @default.
• W2531465624 cites W1556921995 @default.
• W2531465624 cites W1848116267 @default.
• W2531465624 cites W1989263736 @default.
• W2531465624 cites W2010348352 @default.
• W2531465624 cites W2020935227 @default.
• W2531465624 cites W2027867024 @default.
• W2531465624 cites W2030441548 @default.
• W2531465624 cites W2057669384 @default.
• W2531465624 cites W2072046516 @default.
• W2531465624 cites W2077631238 @default.
• W2531465624 cites W2096322289 @default.
• W2531465624 cites W2099287727 @default.
• W2531465624 cites W2104326666 @default.
• W2531465624 cites W2105501846 @default.
• W2531465624 cites W2113038742 @default.
• W2531465624 cites W2127625785 @default.
• W2531465624 cites W2133848823 @default.
• W2531465624 cites W2145693586 @default.
• W2531465624 cites W2414140820 @default.
• W2531465624 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.10.003" @default.
• W2531465624 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27768986" @default.
• W2531465624 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2531465624 type Work @default.
• W2531465624 sameAs 2531465624 @default.
• W2531465624 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2531465624 countsByYear W25314656242019 @default.
• W2531465624 countsByYear W25314656242020 @default.
• W2531465624 countsByYear W25314656242021 @default.
• W2531465624 countsByYear W25314656242022 @default.
• W2531465624 countsByYear W25314656242023 @default.
• W2531465624 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2531465624 hasAuthorship W2531465624A5020802274 @default.
• W2531465624 hasAuthorship W2531465624A5022119399 @default.
• W2531465624 hasAuthorship W2531465624A5046552958 @default.
• W2531465624 hasAuthorship W2531465624A5061427752 @default.
• W2531465624 hasAuthorship W2531465624A5080482065 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConcept C198783460 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConcept C206345919 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConcept C31258907 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConcept C71405471 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConceptScore W2531465624C111472728 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConceptScore W2531465624C138885662 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConceptScore W2531465624C142724271 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConceptScore W2531465624C15744967 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConceptScore W2531465624C159110408 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConceptScore W2531465624C162324750 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConceptScore W2531465624C169760540 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConceptScore W2531465624C198783460 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConceptScore W2531465624C206345919 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConceptScore W2531465624C21547014 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConceptScore W2531465624C23131810 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConceptScore W2531465624C26760741 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConceptScore W2531465624C2779530757 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConceptScore W2531465624C31258907 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConceptScore W2531465624C41008148 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConceptScore W2531465624C71405471 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConceptScore W2531465624C71924100 @default.
• W2531465624 hasConceptScore W2531465624C75630572 @default.
• W2531465624 hasLocation W25314656241 @default.
• W2531465624 hasLocation W25314656242 @default.
• W2531465624 hasOpenAccess W2531465624 @default.
• W2531465624 hasPrimaryLocation W25314656241 @default.
• W2531465624 hasRelatedWork W1966975529 @default.
• W2531465624 hasRelatedWork W2019646663 @default.
• W2531465624 hasRelatedWork W2070725689 @default.
• W2531465624 hasRelatedWork W2159482350 @default.
• W2531465624 hasRelatedWork W2351801629 @default.
• W2531465624 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2531465624 hasRelatedWork W2765980456 @default.
• W2531465624 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2531465624 hasRelatedWork W2976382042 @default.
• W2531465624 hasRelatedWork W4297109642 @default.
• W2531465624 hasVolume "64" @default.
• W2531465624 isParatext "false" @default.

• next