Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2531855135> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2531855135 endingPage "e0164176" @default.
- W2531855135 startingPage "e0164176" @default.
- W2531855135 abstract "Low educational level (EL) and low physical fitness are both predictors of increased morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. It is unknown if EL is related to physical fitness. This would have important implication for the treatment approach of patients of low EL.In 2011/12, we invited participants of a new nationwide Swiss physical activity program for patients with type 2 diabetes to participate in this study. EL was defined by self-report and categorized as low (mandatory education), middle (professional education) or high (high school/university). Physical fitness was determined using 5 validated measures that assessed aerobic fitness, functional lower limb muscle strength, walking speed, balance and flexibility. Potential confounder variables such as other socio-cultural factors, physical activity level, body composition, diabetes-related parameters and complications/co-morbidities as well as well-being were assessed.All invited 185 participants (mean age 59.6 ±9.8 yrs, 76 women) agreed to be included. Of all patients, 23.1% had a low, 32.7% a middle and 44.2% a high EL; 41.8% were professionally active. The study population had a mean BMI of 32.4±5.2 kg/m2 and an HbA1c of 7.3±1.3%. The mean diabetes duration was 8.8±7.4 years. In the baseline assessment, higher EL was associated with increased aerobic fitness, increased functional lower limb muscle strength, and increased walking speed using linear regression analysis (values for low, middle and high EL, respectively: 91.8 ± 27.9, 116.4 ± 49.7 and 134.9 ± 60.4 watts for aerobic fitness (p = 0.002), 15 ± 4.7, 13.9 ± 2.7, 12.6 ± 2.9 seconds for strength (p = 0.001) and 8.8 ± 1.6, 8.3 ± 1.4, 7.8 ± 1.4 seconds for walking speed (p = 0.004)). These associations were independent of potential confounders. Overall, aerobic fitness was 46%, functional limb muscle strength 16%, and walking speed 11% higher in patients of high compared to those of low EL. EL was not related to balance or flexibility.A main strength of the present study is that it addresses a population of importance and a factor (EL) whose understanding can influence future interventions. A second strength is its relatively large sample size of a high-risk population. Third, unlike studies that have shown an association between self-reported fitness and educational level we assessed physical fitness measures by a quantitative and validated test battery using assessors blinded to other data. Another novelty is the extensive evaluation of the role of many relevant confounder variables.In conclusion, we show that in patients with type 2 diabetes EL correlates favorably and independently with important health-related physical fitness measures such as aerobic fitness, walking speed, and lower limb strength. Our findings underline that diabetic patients with low EL should be specifically encouraged to participate in physical activity intervention programs to further reduce social disparities in healthcare. Such programs should be structured and integrate the norms, needs and capacities (financial, time, physical capacities and self-efficacy) of this population, and their effectiveness should be tested in future studies.University of Lausanne clinicaltrials.gov NCT01289587." @default.
- W2531855135 created "2016-10-21" @default.
- W2531855135 creator A5013524529 @default.
- W2531855135 creator A5016801346 @default.
- W2531855135 creator A5017103382 @default.
- W2531855135 creator A5020492229 @default.
- W2531855135 creator A5044262070 @default.
- W2531855135 creator A5055407348 @default.
- W2531855135 creator A5068601955 @default.
- W2531855135 creator A5089184640 @default.
- W2531855135 creator A5089276937 @default.
- W2531855135 date "2016-10-12" @default.
- W2531855135 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2531855135 title "Educational Level Is Related to Physical Fitness in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes – A Cross-Sectional Study" @default.
- W2531855135 cites W1905704792 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W1963656958 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W1964065884 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W1969583122 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W1975324277 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W1981418470 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W1994058370 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W1996165228 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2004008756 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2005947863 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2006339311 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2006994361 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2019814021 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2023821775 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2026788108 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2037094962 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2037445719 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2041976547 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2046446443 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2049694972 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2060651800 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2070684910 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2075354606 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2078220707 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2087026446 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2091573033 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2098593243 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2104564679 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2145025407 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2145160268 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2148696152 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2149019656 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2155749346 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2164505669 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2166514861 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2169312890 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2170165809 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2329993286 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2333035579 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W2415928071 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W4239450651 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W4242364069 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W4293003987 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W70406147 @default.
- W2531855135 cites W72824069 @default.
- W2531855135 doi "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164176" @default.
- W2531855135 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5061350" @default.
- W2531855135 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27732627" @default.
- W2531855135 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W2531855135 type Work @default.
- W2531855135 sameAs 2531855135 @default.
- W2531855135 citedByCount "6" @default.
- W2531855135 countsByYear W25318551352019 @default.
- W2531855135 countsByYear W25318551352020 @default.
- W2531855135 countsByYear W25318551352022 @default.
- W2531855135 countsByYear W25318551352023 @default.
- W2531855135 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2531855135 hasAuthorship W2531855135A5013524529 @default.
- W2531855135 hasAuthorship W2531855135A5016801346 @default.
- W2531855135 hasAuthorship W2531855135A5017103382 @default.
- W2531855135 hasAuthorship W2531855135A5020492229 @default.
- W2531855135 hasAuthorship W2531855135A5044262070 @default.
- W2531855135 hasAuthorship W2531855135A5055407348 @default.
- W2531855135 hasAuthorship W2531855135A5068601955 @default.
- W2531855135 hasAuthorship W2531855135A5089184640 @default.
- W2531855135 hasAuthorship W2531855135A5089276937 @default.
- W2531855135 hasBestOaLocation W25318551351 @default.
- W2531855135 hasConcept C103038586 @default.
- W2531855135 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2531855135 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
- W2531855135 hasConcept C142052008 @default.
- W2531855135 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2531855135 hasConcept C168031717 @default.
- W2531855135 hasConcept C171687745 @default.
- W2531855135 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W2531855135 hasConcept C2777180221 @default.
- W2531855135 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
- W2531855135 hasConcept C555293320 @default.
- W2531855135 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2531855135 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
- W2531855135 hasConcept C77350462 @default.
- W2531855135 hasConcept C8597494 @default.
- W2531855135 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
- W2531855135 hasConceptScore W2531855135C103038586 @default.