Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2535520689> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2535520689 endingPage "972" @default.
- W2535520689 startingPage "963" @default.
- W2535520689 abstract "Background and Aims Although the number of gastric cancer patients aged ≥85 years indicated for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has increased, little is known about the outcomes and prognostic factors. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) of patients aged ≥85 years who underwent ESD for gastric cancer. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 108 patients aged ≥85 years with 149 gastric cancers treated by ESD between 1999 and 2014 at our institution. The clinical outcomes and prognosis were evaluated. Furthermore, the relationships between patient and lesion characteristics with OS were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazards model. Results All patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of 0 to 1. En bloc, R0, and curative resections were achieved in 98.0%, 91.3%, and 72.7%, respectively, without severe adverse events requiring surgery. During a median follow-up period of 40.2 months (range, 1.8–108.7 months), 23 patients died, including 2 of gastric cancer. The 3-year (54.3% vs 95.9%) and 5-year (54.3% vs 76.3%) OS rates were significantly lower in patients with a low (<44.6) as opposed to a higher (≥44.6) prognostic nutritional index (PNI) (P < .001). The PNI was independently prognostic of OS (hazard ratio, 7.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-22.9; P = .001). Conclusions ESD is feasible for gastric cancer patients aged ≥85 years with good PS. However, low PNI was found to be prognostic of reduced OS, indicating the need to evaluate the PNI in determining whether to perform ESD. Although the number of gastric cancer patients aged ≥85 years indicated for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has increased, little is known about the outcomes and prognostic factors. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) of patients aged ≥85 years who underwent ESD for gastric cancer. We retrospectively reviewed 108 patients aged ≥85 years with 149 gastric cancers treated by ESD between 1999 and 2014 at our institution. The clinical outcomes and prognosis were evaluated. Furthermore, the relationships between patient and lesion characteristics with OS were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazards model. All patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of 0 to 1. En bloc, R0, and curative resections were achieved in 98.0%, 91.3%, and 72.7%, respectively, without severe adverse events requiring surgery. During a median follow-up period of 40.2 months (range, 1.8–108.7 months), 23 patients died, including 2 of gastric cancer. The 3-year (54.3% vs 95.9%) and 5-year (54.3% vs 76.3%) OS rates were significantly lower in patients with a low (<44.6) as opposed to a higher (≥44.6) prognostic nutritional index (PNI) (P < .001). The PNI was independently prognostic of OS (hazard ratio, 7.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-22.9; P = .001). ESD is feasible for gastric cancer patients aged ≥85 years with good PS. However, low PNI was found to be prognostic of reduced OS, indicating the need to evaluate the PNI in determining whether to perform ESD." @default.
- W2535520689 created "2016-10-28" @default.
- W2535520689 creator A5001211200 @default.
- W2535520689 creator A5003268929 @default.
- W2535520689 creator A5010269859 @default.
- W2535520689 creator A5023648418 @default.
- W2535520689 creator A5025368142 @default.
- W2535520689 creator A5028671078 @default.
- W2535520689 creator A5046786824 @default.
- W2535520689 creator A5060602384 @default.
- W2535520689 creator A5070398367 @default.
- W2535520689 date "2017-05-01" @default.
- W2535520689 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2535520689 title "Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in gastric cancer patients aged ≥85 years undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection" @default.
- W2535520689 cites W1563740454 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W1855560423 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W1862283601 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W1966145936 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W1976371387 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W1981889617 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W1988318270 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W1994699725 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2000445173 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2000780803 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2018997491 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2019935994 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2022526195 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2035344482 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2038335691 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2039470139 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2041145044 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2043323206 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2045161148 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2047898947 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2057741550 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2069381721 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2076668534 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2079286427 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2081983599 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2083773837 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2087416149 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2117457178 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2118285700 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2120196880 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2121412297 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2132880340 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2133824413 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2155053456 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2185390866 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2260800014 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2278476824 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2396515300 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W2401780066 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W4231021828 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W4246328459 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W4253096148 @default.
- W2535520689 cites W908482109 @default.
- W2535520689 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.013" @default.
- W2535520689 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27751873" @default.
- W2535520689 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W2535520689 type Work @default.
- W2535520689 sameAs 2535520689 @default.
- W2535520689 citedByCount "53" @default.
- W2535520689 countsByYear W25355206892017 @default.
- W2535520689 countsByYear W25355206892018 @default.
- W2535520689 countsByYear W25355206892019 @default.
- W2535520689 countsByYear W25355206892020 @default.
- W2535520689 countsByYear W25355206892021 @default.
- W2535520689 countsByYear W25355206892022 @default.
- W2535520689 countsByYear W25355206892023 @default.
- W2535520689 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2535520689 hasAuthorship W2535520689A5001211200 @default.
- W2535520689 hasAuthorship W2535520689A5003268929 @default.
- W2535520689 hasAuthorship W2535520689A5010269859 @default.
- W2535520689 hasAuthorship W2535520689A5023648418 @default.
- W2535520689 hasAuthorship W2535520689A5025368142 @default.
- W2535520689 hasAuthorship W2535520689A5028671078 @default.
- W2535520689 hasAuthorship W2535520689A5046786824 @default.
- W2535520689 hasAuthorship W2535520689A5060602384 @default.
- W2535520689 hasAuthorship W2535520689A5070398367 @default.
- W2535520689 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W2535520689 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2535520689 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2535520689 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
- W2535520689 hasConcept C207103383 @default.
- W2535520689 hasConcept C2777137803 @default.
- W2535520689 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
- W2535520689 hasConcept C50382708 @default.
- W2535520689 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2535520689 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
- W2535520689 hasConceptScore W2535520689C121608353 @default.
- W2535520689 hasConceptScore W2535520689C126322002 @default.
- W2535520689 hasConceptScore W2535520689C141071460 @default.
- W2535520689 hasConceptScore W2535520689C167135981 @default.
- W2535520689 hasConceptScore W2535520689C207103383 @default.
- W2535520689 hasConceptScore W2535520689C2777137803 @default.
- W2535520689 hasConceptScore W2535520689C44249647 @default.
- W2535520689 hasConceptScore W2535520689C50382708 @default.