Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2536009473> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 67 of
67
with 100 items per page.
- W2536009473 abstract "Adopting the interpretative/hermeneutical method typical of much legal scholarship, this article considers two sets of issues pertaining to LTDNA profiles as evidence in criminal proceedings. The section titled Expert Evidence as Forensic Epistemic Warrant addresses some rather large questions about the epistemic status and probative value of expert testimony in general. It sketches a theoretical model of expert evidence, highlighting five essential criteria: (1) expert competence; (2) disciplinary domain; (3) methodological validity; (4) materiality; and (5) legal admissibility. This generic model of expert authority, highlighting law's fundamentally normative character, applies to all modern forms of criminal adjudication, across Europe and farther afield. The section titled LTDNA Evidence in UK Criminal Trials then examines English and Northern Irish courts' attempts to get to grips with LTDNA evidence in recent cases. Better appreciating the ways in which UK courts have addressed the challenges of LTDNA evidence may offer some insights into parallel developments in other legal systems. Appellate court rulings follow a predictable judicial logic, which might usefully be studied and reflected upon by any forensic scientist or statistician seeking to operate effectively in criminal proceedings. Whilst each legal jurisdiction has its own unique blend of jurisprudence, institutions, cultures and historical traditions, there is considerable scope for comparative analysis and cross-jurisdictional borrowing and instruction. In the spirit of promoting more nuanced and sophisticated international interdisciplinary dialogue, this article examines UK judicial approaches to LTDNA evidence and begins to elucidate their underlying institutional logic. Legal argument and broader policy debates are not confined to considerations of scientific validity, contamination risks and evidential integrity, or associated judgments of legal admissibility or exclusion. They also crucially concern the manner in which LTDNA profiling results are presented and explained to factfinders in criminal trials." @default.
- W2536009473 created "2016-10-28" @default.
- W2536009473 creator A5002795089 @default.
- W2536009473 date "2016-10-25" @default.
- W2536009473 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2536009473 title "LTDNA Evidence on Trial" @default.
- W2536009473 doi "https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2016.00180" @default.
- W2536009473 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5078688" @default.
- W2536009473 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27826316" @default.
- W2536009473 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W2536009473 type Work @default.
- W2536009473 sameAs 2536009473 @default.
- W2536009473 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2536009473 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2536009473 hasAuthorship W2536009473A5002795089 @default.
- W2536009473 hasBestOaLocation W25360094731 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConcept C202565627 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConcept C204434341 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConcept C2778061430 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConcept C44725695 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConcept C71043370 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConceptScore W2536009473C111472728 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConceptScore W2536009473C126322002 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConceptScore W2536009473C138885662 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConceptScore W2536009473C144024400 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConceptScore W2536009473C17744445 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConceptScore W2536009473C199539241 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConceptScore W2536009473C202565627 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConceptScore W2536009473C204434341 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConceptScore W2536009473C2776949292 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConceptScore W2536009473C2778061430 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConceptScore W2536009473C44725695 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConceptScore W2536009473C71043370 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConceptScore W2536009473C71924100 @default.
- W2536009473 hasConceptScore W2536009473C98184364 @default.
- W2536009473 hasLocation W25360094731 @default.
- W2536009473 hasLocation W25360094732 @default.
- W2536009473 hasLocation W25360094733 @default.
- W2536009473 hasLocation W25360094734 @default.
- W2536009473 hasLocation W25360094735 @default.
- W2536009473 hasLocation W25360094736 @default.
- W2536009473 hasOpenAccess W2536009473 @default.
- W2536009473 hasPrimaryLocation W25360094731 @default.
- W2536009473 hasRelatedWork W1494413197 @default.
- W2536009473 hasRelatedWork W1992738963 @default.
- W2536009473 hasRelatedWork W2016087585 @default.
- W2536009473 hasRelatedWork W2141509767 @default.
- W2536009473 hasRelatedWork W2709175396 @default.
- W2536009473 hasRelatedWork W2847055278 @default.
- W2536009473 hasRelatedWork W3080521042 @default.
- W2536009473 hasRelatedWork W4244670297 @default.
- W2536009473 hasRelatedWork W4280591544 @default.
- W2536009473 hasRelatedWork W4315781541 @default.
- W2536009473 hasVolume "7" @default.
- W2536009473 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2536009473 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2536009473 magId "2536009473" @default.
- W2536009473 workType "article" @default.