FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2546831876> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2546831876 endingPage "615.e4" @default.
• W2546831876 startingPage "608" @default.
• W2546831876 abstract "Background & AimsSurveillance of patients with cirrhosis increases early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and prolongs survival. However, its effectiveness is limited by underuse, particularly among racial/ethnic minorities and individuals of low socioeconomic status. We compared the effectiveness of mailed outreach strategies, with and without patient navigation, in increasing the numbers of patients with cirrhosis undergoing surveillance for HCC in a racially diverse and socioeconomically disadvantaged cohort.MethodsWe performed a prospective study of patients with documented or suspected cirrhosis at a large safety-net health system from December 2014 through March 2016. Patients were assigned randomly (1:1:1) to groups that received mailed invitations for an ultrasound screening examination (n = 600), mailed invitations for an ultrasound screening examination and patient navigation (barrier assessment and motivational education for patients who declined screening; n = 600), or usual care (visit-based screening; n = 600). Patients who did not respond to outreach invitations within 2 weeks received up to 3 reminder telephone calls. The primary outcome was completion of abdominal imaging within 6 months of randomization.ResultsBaseline characteristics were similar among groups. Cirrhosis was documented, based on International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, codes, for 79.6% of patients, and suspected, based on noninvasive markers of fibrosis, for 20.4%. In an intent-to-treat analysis, significantly greater proportions of patients who received the mailed invitation and navigation (47.2%) or the mailed invitation alone (44.5%) underwent HCC screening than patients who received usual care (24.3%) (P < .001 for both comparisons). However, screening rates did not differ significantly between outreach the outreach groups (P = .25). The effects of the outreach program were consistent in all subgroups, including Caucasian vs non-Caucasian race, documented vs suspected cirrhosis, Child–Pugh A vs B cirrhosis, and receipt of gastroenterology care.ConclusionsIn a prospective study, we found outreach strategies to double the percentage of patients with cirrhosis who underwent ultrasound screening for HCC. However, adding patient navigation to telephone reminders provided no significant additional benefit. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT02312817. Surveillance of patients with cirrhosis increases early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and prolongs survival. However, its effectiveness is limited by underuse, particularly among racial/ethnic minorities and individuals of low socioeconomic status. We compared the effectiveness of mailed outreach strategies, with and without patient navigation, in increasing the numbers of patients with cirrhosis undergoing surveillance for HCC in a racially diverse and socioeconomically disadvantaged cohort. We performed a prospective study of patients with documented or suspected cirrhosis at a large safety-net health system from December 2014 through March 2016. Patients were assigned randomly (1:1:1) to groups that received mailed invitations for an ultrasound screening examination (n = 600), mailed invitations for an ultrasound screening examination and patient navigation (barrier assessment and motivational education for patients who declined screening; n = 600), or usual care (visit-based screening; n = 600). Patients who did not respond to outreach invitations within 2 weeks received up to 3 reminder telephone calls. The primary outcome was completion of abdominal imaging within 6 months of randomization. Baseline characteristics were similar among groups. Cirrhosis was documented, based on International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, codes, for 79.6% of patients, and suspected, based on noninvasive markers of fibrosis, for 20.4%. In an intent-to-treat analysis, significantly greater proportions of patients who received the mailed invitation and navigation (47.2%) or the mailed invitation alone (44.5%) underwent HCC screening than patients who received usual care (24.3%) (P < .001 for both comparisons). However, screening rates did not differ significantly between outreach the outreach groups (P = .25). The effects of the outreach program were consistent in all subgroups, including Caucasian vs non-Caucasian race, documented vs suspected cirrhosis, Child–Pugh A vs B cirrhosis, and receipt of gastroenterology care. In a prospective study, we found outreach strategies to double the percentage of patients with cirrhosis who underwent ultrasound screening for HCC. However, adding patient navigation to telephone reminders provided no significant additional benefit. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT02312817." @default.
• W2546831876 created "2016-11-11" @default.
• W2546831876 creator A5010382140 @default.
• W2546831876 creator A5011547093 @default.
• W2546831876 creator A5014214683 @default.
• W2546831876 creator A5022729194 @default.
• W2546831876 creator A5026769608 @default.
• W2546831876 creator A5072450173 @default.
• W2546831876 creator A5090378205 @default.
• W2546831876 creator A5091351028 @default.
• W2546831876 creator A5091746173 @default.
• W2546831876 date "2017-02-01" @default.
• W2546831876 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2546831876 title "Mailed Outreach Program Increases Ultrasound Screening of Patients With Cirrhosis for Hepatocellular Carcinoma" @default.
• W2546831876 cites W1941028062 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W1943468419 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W1968812902 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W1969515938 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W1986379420 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W1992447477 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2003296042 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2020215421 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2025890159 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2026251659 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2028980317 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2038894963 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2050171687 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2055797954 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2060544062 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2061784149 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2069129640 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2082617838 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2089927027 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2096275154 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2109671053 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2110033017 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2110287876 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2130360626 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2137052325 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2149854732 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2155101669 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2155399196 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2171017754 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2171104739 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2253248202 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2281232845 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2294765885 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2330752521 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2403816580 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2415973489 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2528614200 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W2544387958 @default.
• W2546831876 cites W901036528 @default.
• W2546831876 doi "https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.10.042" @default.
• W2546831876 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5285373" @default.
• W2546831876 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27825963" @default.
• W2546831876 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2546831876 type Work @default.
• W2546831876 sameAs 2546831876 @default.
• W2546831876 citedByCount "76" @default.
• W2546831876 countsByYear W25468318762017 @default.
• W2546831876 countsByYear W25468318762018 @default.
• W2546831876 countsByYear W25468318762019 @default.
• W2546831876 countsByYear W25468318762020 @default.
• W2546831876 countsByYear W25468318762021 @default.
• W2546831876 countsByYear W25468318762022 @default.
• W2546831876 countsByYear W25468318762023 @default.
• W2546831876 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2546831876 hasAuthorship W2546831876A5010382140 @default.
• W2546831876 hasAuthorship W2546831876A5011547093 @default.
• W2546831876 hasAuthorship W2546831876A5014214683 @default.
• W2546831876 hasAuthorship W2546831876A5022729194 @default.
• W2546831876 hasAuthorship W2546831876A5026769608 @default.
• W2546831876 hasAuthorship W2546831876A5072450173 @default.
• W2546831876 hasAuthorship W2546831876A5090378205 @default.
• W2546831876 hasAuthorship W2546831876A5091351028 @default.
• W2546831876 hasAuthorship W2546831876A5091746173 @default.
• W2546831876 hasBestOaLocation W25468318761 @default.
• W2546831876 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2546831876 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2546831876 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2546831876 hasConcept C2777214474 @default.
• W2546831876 hasConcept C2778019345 @default.
• W2546831876 hasConcept C2780642338 @default.
• W2546831876 hasConcept C2781400479 @default.
• W2546831876 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2546831876 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2546831876 hasConceptScore W2546831876C126322002 @default.
• W2546831876 hasConceptScore W2546831876C17744445 @default.
• W2546831876 hasConceptScore W2546831876C199539241 @default.
• W2546831876 hasConceptScore W2546831876C2777214474 @default.
• W2546831876 hasConceptScore W2546831876C2778019345 @default.
• W2546831876 hasConceptScore W2546831876C2780642338 @default.
• W2546831876 hasConceptScore W2546831876C2781400479 @default.
• W2546831876 hasConceptScore W2546831876C512399662 @default.
• W2546831876 hasConceptScore W2546831876C71924100 @default.
• W2546831876 hasFunder F4320332161 @default.
• W2546831876 hasFunder F4320332177 @default.

• next