Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2548171505> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 58 of
58
with 100 items per page.
- W2548171505 endingPage "74" @default.
- W2548171505 startingPage "71" @default.
- W2548171505 abstract "Aims: More than 30 different ways of performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) are described in the literature. These were developed by surgeons with the aim to improve postoperative and esthetic outcome following LC. The modifications included reduction in port size and/or number than what is used in standard LC. The aim of this literature review was to evaluate the technical feasibility of the modifications of LC without compromising safety and the benefits associated with these modifications in terms of safety, postoperative pain, cosmesis, early recovery, and patient satisfaction. Materials and methods: Literature review was performed on articles describing different techniques of LC, variations in port number and size, and their advantages over one another. The search was made by using search engines like Google, PubMed, Springer link, and HighWire Press. Observation: Reduction in number of ports and port size especially in epigastric site gave advantages in terms of decreased postoperative pain score and esthesis. There was an increase in the number of transumbilical single-site surgery (TUSS) being performed in recent years with advantages like decreased postoperative pain and increased patient acceptance being documented in various studies. Hybrid technique of using additional ports during single-site laparoscopic surgery (SSLS) may be used as a bridge to single-site surgery while the surgeon is in a learning curve from a multiport surgery to SSLS. Currently NOTES cholecystectomy is under evaluation and not routinely performed. But current literature does not provide enough evidence of any clear benefit of any of these modifications over standard LC. Conclusion: This literature review showed that even though there are some advantages in postoperative pain score, esthetic outcome, and patient acceptance while doing the different types of LC in selected patients, there is no evidence of any clear benefit over conventional LC. It is not acceptable to compromise the vision and increase the risk of bile duct injury to the patient while doing LC. Hence, modified LC may be performed by surgeons only after gaining enough experience and in selected group of patients without violating the basic principles of laparoscopic surgery." @default.
- W2548171505 created "2016-11-11" @default.
- W2548171505 creator A5002059915 @default.
- W2548171505 creator A5008852727 @default.
- W2548171505 creator A5087112007 @default.
- W2548171505 date "2016-01-01" @default.
- W2548171505 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
- W2548171505 title "Modifications of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy" @default.
- W2548171505 cites W157343540 @default.
- W2548171505 cites W1848111415 @default.
- W2548171505 cites W1969275316 @default.
- W2548171505 cites W2003441321 @default.
- W2548171505 cites W2025367169 @default.
- W2548171505 cites W2025620857 @default.
- W2548171505 cites W2044360878 @default.
- W2548171505 cites W2047321362 @default.
- W2548171505 cites W2082381686 @default.
- W2548171505 cites W2096612874 @default.
- W2548171505 cites W2162888602 @default.
- W2548171505 cites W2246573892 @default.
- W2548171505 doi "https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10007-1275" @default.
- W2548171505 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W2548171505 type Work @default.
- W2548171505 sameAs 2548171505 @default.
- W2548171505 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2548171505 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2548171505 hasAuthorship W2548171505A5002059915 @default.
- W2548171505 hasAuthorship W2548171505A5008852727 @default.
- W2548171505 hasAuthorship W2548171505A5087112007 @default.
- W2548171505 hasConcept C2776641081 @default.
- W2548171505 hasConcept C2987287001 @default.
- W2548171505 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
- W2548171505 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2548171505 hasConceptScore W2548171505C2776641081 @default.
- W2548171505 hasConceptScore W2548171505C2987287001 @default.
- W2548171505 hasConceptScore W2548171505C61434518 @default.
- W2548171505 hasConceptScore W2548171505C71924100 @default.
- W2548171505 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2548171505 hasLocation W25481715051 @default.
- W2548171505 hasOpenAccess W2548171505 @default.
- W2548171505 hasPrimaryLocation W25481715051 @default.
- W2548171505 hasRelatedWork W1968936653 @default.
- W2548171505 hasRelatedWork W2360637350 @default.
- W2548171505 hasRelatedWork W2370443390 @default.
- W2548171505 hasRelatedWork W2373994074 @default.
- W2548171505 hasRelatedWork W2440682190 @default.
- W2548171505 hasRelatedWork W2501683669 @default.
- W2548171505 hasRelatedWork W2967287585 @default.
- W2548171505 hasRelatedWork W4232844502 @default.
- W2548171505 hasRelatedWork W4238744024 @default.
- W2548171505 hasRelatedWork W4361773639 @default.
- W2548171505 hasVolume "9" @default.
- W2548171505 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2548171505 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2548171505 magId "2548171505" @default.
- W2548171505 workType "article" @default.