FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2548800004> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2548800004 endingPage "120" @default.
• W2548800004 startingPage "115" @default.
• W2548800004 abstract "The number of patients using the internet to obtain health information is growing. This material is unregulated and heterogeneous and can influence patient decisions.To compare the quality, readability, and technical aspects of online information about neck-lifts provided by private practice websites vs academic medical centers and reference sources.In this cross-sectional analysis conducted between November 2015 and January 2016, a Google search of the term neck-lift was performed, and the first 45 websites were evaluated. The websites were categorized as private practice vs other. Private websites (PWs) included sites created by private practice physicians. Other websites (OWs) were created by academic medical centers or reference sources.Quality, readability, and technical aspects of online websites related to neck-lifts. Quality was assessed using the DISCERN criteria and the Health on the Net principles (HONcode). Readability was assessed using 7 validated and widely used criteria. Consensus US reading grade level readability was provided by a website (readabilityformulas.com). Twelve technical aspects were evaluated based on criteria specified by medical website creators.Forty-five websites (8 OWs [18%] and 37 PWs [82%]) were analyzed. There was a significant difference in quality between OWs and PWs based on the DISCERN criteria and HONcode principles. The DISCERN overall mean (SD) scores were 2.3 (0.5) for OWs and 1.3 (0.3) for PWs (P < .001). Of a total possible score of 14 using the HONcode analysis, the mean (SD) was 8.6 (1.8) (range, 5-11) for OW, and the mean (SD) was 5.8 (1.7) (range, 2-9) for PW. The mean (SD) readability consensus reading grade level scores were 11.7 (1.9) for OWs and 10.6 (1.9) for PWs. Of a total possible score of 12, the mean (SD) technical scores were 6.3 (1.8) (range, 4-9) for OWs and 6.4 (1.5) (range, 3-9) for PWs.Compared with PWs, OWs had a significantly higher quality score based on both the DISCERN criteria and HONcode principles. The mean readability for OWs and PWs was grade 11 and grade 10, respectively, significantly higher than the grade 7 level recommended by the National Institutes of Health. Assessment of technical criteria demonstrated room for improvement in providing links to social media and blogs and reducing advertisements. Improving the quality and readability of online information may result in increased patient understanding, more active patient involvement, and ultimately better outcomes. Enhancing the technical aspects of websites may increase website traffic and patient volume.NA." @default.
• W2548800004 created "2016-11-11" @default.
• W2548800004 creator A5012181184 @default.
• W2548800004 creator A5015266583 @default.
• W2548800004 creator A5026997567 @default.
• W2548800004 creator A5051806655 @default.
• W2548800004 creator A5068072617 @default.
• W2548800004 creator A5071963665 @default.
• W2548800004 creator A5080274706 @default.
• W2548800004 date "2017-03-01" @default.
• W2548800004 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2548800004 title "Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck‐Lifts" @default.
• W2548800004 cites W1968894666 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W1993568272 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W2024993993 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W2027225158 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W2030244883 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W2045241688 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W2052189418 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W2065618601 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W2091561227 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W2098961885 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W2108828807 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W2119694238 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W2124095734 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W2141158804 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W2143607388 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W2170286226 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W2228899009 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W2265939047 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W2276777453 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W2286897506 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W2318202834 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W2332781197 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W2337813691 @default.
• W2548800004 cites W2399509446 @default.
• W2548800004 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1219" @default.
• W2548800004 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27812680" @default.
• W2548800004 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2548800004 type Work @default.
• W2548800004 sameAs 2548800004 @default.
• W2548800004 citedByCount "25" @default.
• W2548800004 countsByYear W25488000042017 @default.
• W2548800004 countsByYear W25488000042018 @default.
• W2548800004 countsByYear W25488000042019 @default.
• W2548800004 countsByYear W25488000042021 @default.
• W2548800004 countsByYear W25488000042022 @default.
• W2548800004 countsByYear W25488000042023 @default.
• W2548800004 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2548800004 hasAuthorship W2548800004A5012181184 @default.
• W2548800004 hasAuthorship W2548800004A5015266583 @default.
• W2548800004 hasAuthorship W2548800004A5026997567 @default.
• W2548800004 hasAuthorship W2548800004A5051806655 @default.
• W2548800004 hasAuthorship W2548800004A5068072617 @default.
• W2548800004 hasAuthorship W2548800004A5071963665 @default.
• W2548800004 hasAuthorship W2548800004A5080274706 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConcept C110875604 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConcept C176217482 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConcept C2778143727 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConcept C2779346075 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConcept C2982795734 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConcept C3017523755 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConceptScore W2548800004C110875604 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConceptScore W2548800004C111472728 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConceptScore W2548800004C136764020 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConceptScore W2548800004C138885662 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConceptScore W2548800004C144133560 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConceptScore W2548800004C145420912 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConceptScore W2548800004C15744967 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConceptScore W2548800004C160735492 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConceptScore W2548800004C162324750 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConceptScore W2548800004C162853370 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConceptScore W2548800004C176217482 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConceptScore W2548800004C19527891 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConceptScore W2548800004C199360897 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConceptScore W2548800004C2778143727 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConceptScore W2548800004C2779346075 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConceptScore W2548800004C2779530757 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConceptScore W2548800004C2982795734 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConceptScore W2548800004C3017523755 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConceptScore W2548800004C41008148 @default.
• W2548800004 hasConceptScore W2548800004C50522688 @default.

• next