Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2549593696> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 58 of
58
with 100 items per page.
- W2549593696 abstract "Introduction Patients with stable coeliac disease in Croydon are discharged back to their General Practitioners with a yearly follow-up protocol. We conducted a patient survey to evaluate its uptake and to ascertain the views of patients about their follow-up. Methods An online survey was designed and sent to all patients registered with Croydon group of Coeliac UK and had an e-mail address in February 2015. A reminder was sent to all members after 6 weeks. The responses were computed in May 2015, presented to Croydon Coeliac UK members and sent to the CCG. Paper copies were also given out at a group meeting. Results Of the 233 registered members, the survey questionnaire was sent electronically to about 200 patients at 9 post codes in Croydon. There were 101 responses of which 82 were complete. 94% responders were over 18 years of age. 60% patients never received an appointment from their GP for an annual follow-up (n = 84). Only 50% patients had a follow-up in the previous year. Most recent review was conducted by GP in 37% cases, GP practice nurse in 8%, Deititian in 20%, local gastroenterologist 32% (n = 76). Overall 80% patients had seen a dietitian (n = 85). 70% (n = 87) had been offered DEXA scan for bone mineral density. About 65% had a blood test in the last year (n = 87). Calcium, haematinics, vitamin D, coeliac antibodies were checked in about 40–50% patients (n = 34) with 66% receiving feedback on the results (n = 47). Apart from enquiry about gluten free diet in 78% cases, all other questions relating to coeliac disease were discussed in less than 40% cases (n = 60). Vaccinations were discussed in only 8% cases and membership of Coeliac UK in 18%. Only 43% of patients were offered a yearly follow-up while 7% were referred to the hospital gastroenterologist (n = 57). When asked about the expectations of patients, 90% wanted an annual follow-up (n = 78) with 37% preferring to see their GP, 9% GP practice nurse, 21% dietitians, 27% gastroenterologist (n = 75). Of the 77 respondents, 46% said they would be happy to attend dietitian led group sessions, 38% preferred not to while 17% had no opinion. Conclusion The annual follow-up of patients with coeliac disease in the community is patchy. The quality of this appointment is also inadequate. If these results can be replicated more widely, there may be a place for specialist community clinics with links between GP, dietitians and local gastroenterologists. Disclosure of Interest None Declared" @default.
- W2549593696 created "2016-11-30" @default.
- W2549593696 creator A5015201067 @default.
- W2549593696 creator A5056045578 @default.
- W2549593696 creator A5063374262 @default.
- W2549593696 creator A5063427877 @default.
- W2549593696 date "2016-06-01" @default.
- W2549593696 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2549593696 title "PWE-063 Annual Review of Patients with Coeliac Disease in The Community? – A Patient Survey" @default.
- W2549593696 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312388.309" @default.
- W2549593696 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W2549593696 type Work @default.
- W2549593696 sameAs 2549593696 @default.
- W2549593696 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2549593696 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2549593696 hasAuthorship W2549593696A5015201067 @default.
- W2549593696 hasAuthorship W2549593696A5056045578 @default.
- W2549593696 hasAuthorship W2549593696A5063374262 @default.
- W2549593696 hasAuthorship W2549593696A5063427877 @default.
- W2549593696 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2549593696 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
- W2549593696 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
- W2549593696 hasConcept C2780349322 @default.
- W2549593696 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W2549593696 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2549593696 hasConceptScore W2549593696C126322002 @default.
- W2549593696 hasConceptScore W2549593696C187212893 @default.
- W2549593696 hasConceptScore W2549593696C2779134260 @default.
- W2549593696 hasConceptScore W2549593696C2780349322 @default.
- W2549593696 hasConceptScore W2549593696C512399662 @default.
- W2549593696 hasConceptScore W2549593696C71924100 @default.
- W2549593696 hasLocation W25495936961 @default.
- W2549593696 hasOpenAccess W2549593696 @default.
- W2549593696 hasPrimaryLocation W25495936961 @default.
- W2549593696 hasRelatedWork W1986836999 @default.
- W2549593696 hasRelatedWork W2015117642 @default.
- W2549593696 hasRelatedWork W2016959150 @default.
- W2549593696 hasRelatedWork W2077857991 @default.
- W2549593696 hasRelatedWork W2090232731 @default.
- W2549593696 hasRelatedWork W2321012057 @default.
- W2549593696 hasRelatedWork W2329614687 @default.
- W2549593696 hasRelatedWork W2403260627 @default.
- W2549593696 hasRelatedWork W2505604578 @default.
- W2549593696 hasRelatedWork W2551362563 @default.
- W2549593696 hasRelatedWork W2564016180 @default.
- W2549593696 hasRelatedWork W2742600099 @default.
- W2549593696 hasRelatedWork W2747517120 @default.
- W2549593696 hasRelatedWork W2807837831 @default.
- W2549593696 hasRelatedWork W2951226427 @default.
- W2549593696 hasRelatedWork W3023018251 @default.
- W2549593696 hasRelatedWork W3110253952 @default.
- W2549593696 hasRelatedWork W3201144785 @default.
- W2549593696 hasRelatedWork W2059965056 @default.
- W2549593696 hasRelatedWork W2067633707 @default.
- W2549593696 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2549593696 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2549593696 magId "2549593696" @default.
- W2549593696 workType "article" @default.