Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2550650061> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2550650061 endingPage "621" @default.
- W2550650061 startingPage "614" @default.
- W2550650061 abstract "The growing need for surgeons who are educated and trained in bariatric surgery has raised many issues related to training in this field.This study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) performed by doctors-in-training during their residency in general surgery.Tertiary referral university teaching hospital, Poland.We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent bariatric surgery. One group underwent surgery performed by at least third-year residents learning particular types of surgeries (trainee group), and the second group underwent surgeries performed by experienced bariatric surgeons (mentor group). The primary endpoint was the safety of the procedures. We analyzed factors related to the intraoperative and postoperative course. The secondary endpoint was long-term weight reduction. A lower body mass index (BMI), fewer co-morbidities, and preferably female sex were the selection criteria for patients in the trainee group.We enrolled 408 patients who met all inclusion criteria. Among them, 233 underwent SG and 175 underwent LRYGB. For both SG and LRYGB, the median maximum preoperative weight was significantly lower in the trainee than mentor group. We found no statistically significant differences in the demographic factors or co-morbidities between the 2 groups. The median duration of SG and LRYGB surgery was significantly longer in the trainee than mentor group. The median number of stapler firings during SG was significantly lower in the trainee than mentor group. The number of stapler firings during LRYGB did not differ between the 2 groups. The incidence of intraoperative difficulties, which were based on the operator's subjective opinion, was higher in the trainee than mentor group for both SG and LRYGB. However, intraoperative difficulties had no significant impact on the intraoperative complication rate or risk of perioperative complications. The average percentage weight loss (%WL), percentage excess weight loss (%EWL), and percentage excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) in the all study group were 31.14%±9.11%, 56.17%±17.27%, and 65.42%±19.28%, respectively. For patients who underwent SG, we found no significant difference in %WL, %EWL, or %EBMIL between the trainee and mentor groups.The performance of bariatric surgeries by residents does not affect the risk of reoperation, intraoperative adverse events, or surgical complications. Performance of SG and LRYGB by trainees takes significantly longer but has no untoward consequences for the patient. Both SG and LRYGB performed by a doctor-in-training and experienced operator lead to comparable outcomes in terms of weight reduction." @default.
- W2550650061 created "2016-11-30" @default.
- W2550650061 creator A5018738756 @default.
- W2550650061 creator A5022290498 @default.
- W2550650061 creator A5032014524 @default.
- W2550650061 creator A5049941113 @default.
- W2550650061 creator A5065650835 @default.
- W2550650061 creator A5077818436 @default.
- W2550650061 date "2017-04-01" @default.
- W2550650061 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2550650061 title "Are bariatric operations performed by residents safe and efficient?" @default.
- W2550650061 cites W1954858097 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W1970791678 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W1972758729 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W1975793402 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W1983958928 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W1984637823 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W1985302979 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W1986860742 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W1991029117 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W1997594107 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W1999177602 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W2005605028 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W2024242507 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W2036567002 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W2067192790 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W2068043277 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W2069752448 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W2083710307 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W2088054550 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W2093241172 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W2095410912 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W2096861677 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W2109557090 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W2140285437 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W2149173447 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W2149962856 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W2151893161 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W2170909691 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W2208303158 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W222518908 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W2298615928 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W2916751378 @default.
- W2550650061 cites W2937857310 @default.
- W2550650061 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.11.017" @default.
- W2550650061 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28159560" @default.
- W2550650061 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W2550650061 type Work @default.
- W2550650061 sameAs 2550650061 @default.
- W2550650061 citedByCount "36" @default.
- W2550650061 countsByYear W25506500612017 @default.
- W2550650061 countsByYear W25506500612018 @default.
- W2550650061 countsByYear W25506500612019 @default.
- W2550650061 countsByYear W25506500612020 @default.
- W2550650061 countsByYear W25506500612021 @default.
- W2550650061 countsByYear W25506500612022 @default.
- W2550650061 countsByYear W25506500612023 @default.
- W2550650061 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2550650061 hasAuthorship W2550650061A5018738756 @default.
- W2550650061 hasAuthorship W2550650061A5022290498 @default.
- W2550650061 hasAuthorship W2550650061A5032014524 @default.
- W2550650061 hasAuthorship W2550650061A5049941113 @default.
- W2550650061 hasAuthorship W2550650061A5065650835 @default.
- W2550650061 hasAuthorship W2550650061A5077818436 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConcept C203092338 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConcept C2776135927 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConcept C2778586554 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConcept C2780221984 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConcept C3019402062 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConcept C511355011 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConcept C544821477 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConceptScore W2550650061C126322002 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConceptScore W2550650061C141071460 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConceptScore W2550650061C159110408 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConceptScore W2550650061C168563851 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConceptScore W2550650061C203092338 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConceptScore W2550650061C2776135927 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConceptScore W2550650061C2778586554 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConceptScore W2550650061C2780221984 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConceptScore W2550650061C3019402062 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConceptScore W2550650061C511355011 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConceptScore W2550650061C544821477 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConceptScore W2550650061C61434518 @default.
- W2550650061 hasConceptScore W2550650061C71924100 @default.
- W2550650061 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W2550650061 hasLocation W25506500611 @default.
- W2550650061 hasLocation W25506500612 @default.
- W2550650061 hasOpenAccess W2550650061 @default.
- W2550650061 hasPrimaryLocation W25506500611 @default.
- W2550650061 hasRelatedWork W1024458283 @default.
- W2550650061 hasRelatedWork W1812857953 @default.
- W2550650061 hasRelatedWork W1988174590 @default.