Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2553417059> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 71 of
71
with 100 items per page.
- W2553417059 abstract "Human languages can be seen as objects of empirical observation and not only as objects of possible approximation by artificial languages. From that point of view, a careful rigorous approach must state what, in human languages, is accessible to the observers’ senses and how this is related to semantic facts, which, in turn, must also be clearly characterised. The characterization of semantic facts must, in particular, be distinguished from what is accessible to the sensorial apparatus, as soon as one wants to distinguish between language and speech. I will show that, in fulfilling that programme, one has to assess a central role to the constraints that human languages expressions impose onto how utterances and discourse can modify their audience’s points of view. In other words, accepting a classical characterization of argumentation (according to which an argumentation intends to modify the point of view of the audience), I will show that the semantic description of human languages must include the description of the constraints that words and expressions impose on the possible argumentative orientation of utterances containing those words and expressions. I will then emphasize the distinction between constraints that must be met in order to understand an utterance, and, on the other hand, constraints that result from the interpretation of an utterance. The former type of constraints will be shown to be characteristic of the ideology within which the speaker presents her/his discourse to be inscribed; sets of such constraints will be shown to characterise the so called cultural background in which the warrants of the argumentations are found. I will, finally, present a descriptive model for this theoretical approach, based on a modified version of the argumentative topoi introduced by Ducrot in the 80s and then abandoned by him. 1. Scientificity and empiricity in the study of language meaning I will very briefly 1 mention the main characteristics of scientificity and empiricity, and use them to show that moderate objectivism is irrational (even more irrational, actually, than extreme objectivism…). The whole discussion will help clarifying what is really observable in semantics and what semanticists are supposed to talk about, using those observations. 1.1. General features about scientificity and empiricity" @default.
- W2553417059 created "2016-11-30" @default.
- W2553417059 creator A5088292256 @default.
- W2553417059 date "2005-01-01" @default.
- W2553417059 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2553417059 title "Points of view and Argumentation: Semantics as an Empirical Science" @default.
- W2553417059 cites W2063380184 @default.
- W2553417059 cites W2066665965 @default.
- W2553417059 cites W2333018025 @default.
- W2553417059 cites W2753533763 @default.
- W2553417059 cites W563097783 @default.
- W2553417059 cites W618903898 @default.
- W2553417059 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
- W2553417059 type Work @default.
- W2553417059 sameAs 2553417059 @default.
- W2553417059 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2553417059 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2553417059 hasAuthorship W2553417059A5088292256 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConcept C184337299 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConcept C2775852435 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConcept C2781306805 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConcept C28719098 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConcept C527412718 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConcept C65059942 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConceptScore W2553417059C138885662 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConceptScore W2553417059C154945302 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConceptScore W2553417059C184337299 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConceptScore W2553417059C199360897 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConceptScore W2553417059C2524010 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConceptScore W2553417059C2775852435 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConceptScore W2553417059C2781306805 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConceptScore W2553417059C28719098 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConceptScore W2553417059C33923547 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConceptScore W2553417059C41008148 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConceptScore W2553417059C41895202 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConceptScore W2553417059C527412718 @default.
- W2553417059 hasConceptScore W2553417059C65059942 @default.
- W2553417059 hasLocation W25534170591 @default.
- W2553417059 hasOpenAccess W2553417059 @default.
- W2553417059 hasPrimaryLocation W25534170591 @default.
- W2553417059 hasRelatedWork W112970750 @default.
- W2553417059 hasRelatedWork W152296208 @default.
- W2553417059 hasRelatedWork W1987264155 @default.
- W2553417059 hasRelatedWork W2059196829 @default.
- W2553417059 hasRelatedWork W2118965503 @default.
- W2553417059 hasRelatedWork W2217631055 @default.
- W2553417059 hasRelatedWork W2227733487 @default.
- W2553417059 hasRelatedWork W2314796531 @default.
- W2553417059 hasRelatedWork W2322535347 @default.
- W2553417059 hasRelatedWork W2331586003 @default.
- W2553417059 hasRelatedWork W2475928921 @default.
- W2553417059 hasRelatedWork W2501239352 @default.
- W2553417059 hasRelatedWork W2506394677 @default.
- W2553417059 hasRelatedWork W2524219179 @default.
- W2553417059 hasRelatedWork W254070845 @default.
- W2553417059 hasRelatedWork W2737725272 @default.
- W2553417059 hasRelatedWork W2739426510 @default.
- W2553417059 hasRelatedWork W2739837944 @default.
- W2553417059 hasRelatedWork W82268705 @default.
- W2553417059 hasRelatedWork W2757287880 @default.
- W2553417059 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2553417059 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2553417059 magId "2553417059" @default.
- W2553417059 workType "article" @default.