Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2556162574> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2556162574 endingPage "e1002172" @default.
- W2556162574 startingPage "e1002172" @default.
- W2556162574 abstract "The minimally invasive autopsy (MIA) is being investigated as an alternative to complete diagnostic autopsies for cause of death (CoD) investigation. Before potential implementation of the MIA in settings where post-mortem procedures are unusual, a thorough assessment of its feasibility and acceptability is essential.We conducted a socio-behavioural study at the community level to understand local attitudes and perceptions related to death and the hypothetical feasibility and acceptability of conducting MIAs in six distinct settings in Gabon, Kenya, Mali, Mozambique, and Pakistan. A total of 504 interviews (135 key informants, 175 health providers [including formal health professionals and traditional or informal health providers], and 194 relatives of deceased people) were conducted. The constructs willingness to know the CoD and hypothetical acceptability of MIAs were quantified and analysed using the framework analysis approach to compare the occurrence of themes related to acceptability across participants. Overall, 75% (379/504) of the participants would be willing to know the CoD of a relative. The overall hypothetical acceptability of MIA on a relative was 73% (366/504). The idea of the MIA was acceptable because of its perceived simplicity and rapidity and particularly for not mutilating the body. Further, MIAs were believed to help prevent infectious diseases, address hereditary diseases, clarify the CoD, and avoid witchcraft accusations and conflicts within families. The main concerns regarding the procedure included the potential breach of confidentiality on the CoD, the misperception of organ removal, and the incompatibility with some religious beliefs. Formal health professionals were concerned about possible contradictions between the MIA findings and the clinical pre-mortem diagnoses. Acceptability of the MIA was equally high among Christian and Islamic communities. However, in the two predominantly Muslim countries, MIA acceptability was higher in Mali than in Pakistan. While the results of the study are encouraging for the potential use of the MIA for CoD investigation in low-income settings, they remain hypothetical, with a need for confirmation with real-life MIA implementation and in populations beyond Health and Demographic Surveillance System areas.This study showed a high level of interest in knowing the CoD of a relative and a high hypothetical acceptability of MIAs as a tool for CoD investigation across six distinct settings. These findings anticipate potential barriers and facilitators, both at the health facility and community level, essential for local tailoring of recommendations for future MIA implementation." @default.
- W2556162574 created "2016-11-30" @default.
- W2556162574 creator A5002426975 @default.
- W2556162574 creator A5003878310 @default.
- W2556162574 creator A5006382071 @default.
- W2556162574 creator A5006913927 @default.
- W2556162574 creator A5008783294 @default.
- W2556162574 creator A5011732929 @default.
- W2556162574 creator A5015285519 @default.
- W2556162574 creator A5016675684 @default.
- W2556162574 creator A5020654657 @default.
- W2556162574 creator A5022576161 @default.
- W2556162574 creator A5029652541 @default.
- W2556162574 creator A5033104817 @default.
- W2556162574 creator A5043938728 @default.
- W2556162574 creator A5052447624 @default.
- W2556162574 creator A5057901946 @default.
- W2556162574 creator A5081252952 @default.
- W2556162574 creator A5081603649 @default.
- W2556162574 creator A5085101931 @default.
- W2556162574 creator A5088720377 @default.
- W2556162574 creator A5089617808 @default.
- W2556162574 creator A5090444000 @default.
- W2556162574 creator A5091899623 @default.
- W2556162574 date "2016-11-22" @default.
- W2556162574 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2556162574 title "Willingness to Know the Cause of Death and Hypothetical Acceptability of the Minimally Invasive Autopsy in Six Diverse African and Asian Settings: A Mixed Methods Socio-Behavioural Study" @default.
- W2556162574 cites W140596486 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W1538121857 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W1820391822 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W1931521103 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W1951642454 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W1968534936 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W1986558106 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W1995497537 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W1997200168 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W1999944898 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W2015110804 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W2043403330 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W2054901123 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W2057553695 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W2058270358 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W2065418485 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W2069262914 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W2090613637 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W2090896428 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W2094837169 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W2103213616 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W2107111987 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W2110346383 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W2116673403 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W2119174316 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W2136820875 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W2139624928 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W2159836705 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W2312568748 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W2550929752 @default.
- W2556162574 cites W4254515101 @default.
- W2556162574 doi "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002172" @default.
- W2556162574 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5119724" @default.
- W2556162574 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27875532" @default.
- W2556162574 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W2556162574 type Work @default.
- W2556162574 sameAs 2556162574 @default.
- W2556162574 citedByCount "68" @default.
- W2556162574 countsByYear W25561625742016 @default.
- W2556162574 countsByYear W25561625742017 @default.
- W2556162574 countsByYear W25561625742018 @default.
- W2556162574 countsByYear W25561625742019 @default.
- W2556162574 countsByYear W25561625742020 @default.
- W2556162574 countsByYear W25561625742021 @default.
- W2556162574 countsByYear W25561625742022 @default.
- W2556162574 countsByYear W25561625742023 @default.
- W2556162574 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2556162574 hasAuthorship W2556162574A5002426975 @default.
- W2556162574 hasAuthorship W2556162574A5003878310 @default.
- W2556162574 hasAuthorship W2556162574A5006382071 @default.
- W2556162574 hasAuthorship W2556162574A5006913927 @default.
- W2556162574 hasAuthorship W2556162574A5008783294 @default.
- W2556162574 hasAuthorship W2556162574A5011732929 @default.
- W2556162574 hasAuthorship W2556162574A5015285519 @default.
- W2556162574 hasAuthorship W2556162574A5016675684 @default.
- W2556162574 hasAuthorship W2556162574A5020654657 @default.
- W2556162574 hasAuthorship W2556162574A5022576161 @default.
- W2556162574 hasAuthorship W2556162574A5029652541 @default.
- W2556162574 hasAuthorship W2556162574A5033104817 @default.
- W2556162574 hasAuthorship W2556162574A5043938728 @default.
- W2556162574 hasAuthorship W2556162574A5052447624 @default.
- W2556162574 hasAuthorship W2556162574A5057901946 @default.
- W2556162574 hasAuthorship W2556162574A5081252952 @default.
- W2556162574 hasAuthorship W2556162574A5081603649 @default.
- W2556162574 hasAuthorship W2556162574A5085101931 @default.
- W2556162574 hasAuthorship W2556162574A5088720377 @default.
- W2556162574 hasAuthorship W2556162574A5089617808 @default.
- W2556162574 hasAuthorship W2556162574A5090444000 @default.
- W2556162574 hasAuthorship W2556162574A5091899623 @default.
- W2556162574 hasBestOaLocation W25561625741 @default.
- W2556162574 hasConcept C142724271 @default.