FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2556355268> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2556355268 endingPage "145" @default.
• W2556355268 startingPage "134" @default.
• W2556355268 abstract "This study assessed the impact of organizational justice on knowledge sharing among employees of Chinese telecommunications firms. The study focused on five forms of organizational justice (distributive, procedural, interactional, temporal, and spatial) and two forms of knowledge sharing (donating and collecting). A self-administered questionnaire yielded data for 245 employees. The data were analyzed using a two-step process in Amos 21. First, the measurement model was determined through CFA. Second, SEM was applied to test the hypotheses. The results suggest that if employees have positive perceptions of distributive, procedural, interactional, and temporal justice, they are intrinsically encouraged to share their knowledge with colleagues. Spatial justice, however, was found to affect knowledge sharing negatively and significantly. In an organizational work context, each form of organizational justice has a unique contribution toward knowledge sharing. Therefore, all forms of organizational justice should be considered. Este estudio es un intento de determinar el impacto de la justicia organizacional en el intercambio de conocimiento entre los empleados del sector de las telecomunicaciones en China, dándosele particular atención a las formas de justicia organizacional: justicia distributiva, procedimental, interaccional, temporal y justicia espacial. El intercambio de conocimiento, en este sentido, se definirá como donación de conocimiento y colección de conocimiento. Se distribuyó un cuestionario autoadministrado con el objetivo de obtener respuestas de 245 empleados, cuyo análisis de datos se llevó a cabo en dos etapas: la primera, mediante el Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio (AFC) y, la segunda, por medio del Modelo de Ecuaciones Estructurales (SEM). En ambas etapas se hizo uso de AMOS 21.Los resultados del estudio sugieren que si los empleados tienen percepciones positivas sobre la justicia distributiva, procedimental, interaccional y temporal, están intrínsecamente motivados a compartir sus conocimientos con sus compañeros de trabajo. La justicia espacial, por su parte, resultó ser negativa pero con un significante efecto en el intercambio de conocimiento. Cada forma de justicia organizacional contribuye de forma especial en el intercambio de conocimiento; de ahí que, en el contexto organizacional de trabajo, se sugiera considerarlas todas y cada una de ellas como igualmente importantes." @default.
• W2556355268 created "2016-11-30" @default.
• W2556355268 creator A5030279265 @default.
• W2556355268 creator A5033594081 @default.
• W2556355268 creator A5036888351 @default.
• W2556355268 creator A5055530650 @default.
• W2556355268 creator A5090481352 @default.
• W2556355268 date "2017-09-01" @default.
• W2556355268 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W2556355268 title "The effect of organizational justice on knowledge sharing: Empirical evidence from the Chinese telecommunications sector" @default.
• W2556355268 cites W1501862377 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W1600509641 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W1971870746 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W1971931485 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W1973605348 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W1976089762 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W1987258130 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W1993760488 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W1994084731 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W2002509673 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W2022658137 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W2023266871 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W2025227689 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W2027742999 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W2046961245 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W2050026389 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W2059851708 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W2071666535 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W2073055478 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W2073762417 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W2082450878 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W2096320953 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W2106096361 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W2108750986 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W2136690337 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W214932496 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W2162437324 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W2163297822 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W2168814736 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W2236373062 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W2287043744 @default.
• W2556355268 cites W2616974477 @default.
• W2556355268 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.09.002" @default.
• W2556355268 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2556355268 type Work @default.
• W2556355268 sameAs 2556355268 @default.
• W2556355268 citedByCount "40" @default.
• W2556355268 countsByYear W25563552682016 @default.
• W2556355268 countsByYear W25563552682018 @default.
• W2556355268 countsByYear W25563552682019 @default.
• W2556355268 countsByYear W25563552682020 @default.
• W2556355268 countsByYear W25563552682021 @default.
• W2556355268 countsByYear W25563552682022 @default.
• W2556355268 countsByYear W25563552682023 @default.
• W2556355268 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2556355268 hasAuthorship W2556355268A5030279265 @default.
• W2556355268 hasAuthorship W2556355268A5033594081 @default.
• W2556355268 hasAuthorship W2556355268A5036888351 @default.
• W2556355268 hasAuthorship W2556355268A5055530650 @default.
• W2556355268 hasAuthorship W2556355268A5090481352 @default.
• W2556355268 hasBestOaLocation W25563552681 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C178550888 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C2776604539 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C2778412681 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C2779149496 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C2779359184 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C2780129364 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConcept C83030740 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConceptScore W2556355268C138885662 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConceptScore W2556355268C139621336 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConceptScore W2556355268C144024400 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConceptScore W2556355268C144133560 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConceptScore W2556355268C15708023 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConceptScore W2556355268C15744967 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConceptScore W2556355268C166957645 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConceptScore W2556355268C169760540 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConceptScore W2556355268C17744445 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConceptScore W2556355268C178550888 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConceptScore W2556355268C199539241 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConceptScore W2556355268C205649164 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConceptScore W2556355268C26760741 @default.
• W2556355268 hasConceptScore W2556355268C2776604539 @default.

• next