Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2557648318> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 81 of
81
with 100 items per page.
- W2557648318 abstract "Educational peer assessment has proven to be a powerful approach for providing students timely feedback and allowing them to help and learn from each other. In an educational setting, most peer assessment consists of a single round. The problem with this setting is that, either the authors do not have a chance to update their work, which makes the suggestions from their peers useless, or the author can make changes after receiving the peer reviews, which forecloses using peer review to help assign grades. To address these issues, in our classes we now use two rounds of online review, with a different rubric for each. Our Expertiza peer-review system allows the evaluation rubric to vary by rounds. In the first review round, we present a formative review rubric to the peer reviewers. In the formative rubric, we try to encourage student reviewers to look into details, point out the problems they can find in the author's work, and offer insightful suggestions. After the formative review round, authors have the opportunity to submit an updated version of their artifacts. Next comes a summative peer-review round, using a summative rubric. A summative peer-review rubric focused more on evaluating the quality of the artifact by comparing it against specific benchmarks. In this paper, we discuss the design of the two-round peer-review assignments in a computer-science course and present our observations on student peer-review activity. An analysis of students' peer-assessment responses confirms the effectiveness of this design of peer-review activity." @default.
- W2557648318 created "2016-12-08" @default.
- W2557648318 creator A5016392085 @default.
- W2557648318 creator A5037793920 @default.
- W2557648318 creator A5040537321 @default.
- W2557648318 creator A5043293107 @default.
- W2557648318 date "2016-10-01" @default.
- W2557648318 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2557648318 title "An experiment with separate formative and summative rubrics in educational peer assessment" @default.
- W2557648318 cites W1515323574 @default.
- W2557648318 cites W1970396277 @default.
- W2557648318 cites W2009972843 @default.
- W2557648318 cites W2115389369 @default.
- W2557648318 cites W2140661853 @default.
- W2557648318 cites W2142995122 @default.
- W2557648318 cites W2186573260 @default.
- W2557648318 cites W2188168286 @default.
- W2557648318 cites W2189548424 @default.
- W2557648318 cites W2270025967 @default.
- W2557648318 cites W2559042319 @default.
- W2557648318 cites W80878321 @default.
- W2557648318 doi "https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.2016.7757597" @default.
- W2557648318 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W2557648318 type Work @default.
- W2557648318 sameAs 2557648318 @default.
- W2557648318 citedByCount "7" @default.
- W2557648318 countsByYear W25576483182016 @default.
- W2557648318 countsByYear W25576483182017 @default.
- W2557648318 countsByYear W25576483182019 @default.
- W2557648318 countsByYear W25576483182021 @default.
- W2557648318 countsByYear W25576483182023 @default.
- W2557648318 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
- W2557648318 hasAuthorship W2557648318A5016392085 @default.
- W2557648318 hasAuthorship W2557648318A5037793920 @default.
- W2557648318 hasAuthorship W2557648318A5040537321 @default.
- W2557648318 hasAuthorship W2557648318A5043293107 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConcept C110754006 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConcept C111640148 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConcept C138368954 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConcept C152747807 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConcept C42058189 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConcept C42525527 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConcept C53839665 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConceptScore W2557648318C110754006 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConceptScore W2557648318C111640148 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConceptScore W2557648318C138368954 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConceptScore W2557648318C145420912 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConceptScore W2557648318C152747807 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConceptScore W2557648318C15744967 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConceptScore W2557648318C17744445 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConceptScore W2557648318C199539241 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConceptScore W2557648318C41008148 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConceptScore W2557648318C42058189 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConceptScore W2557648318C42525527 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConceptScore W2557648318C509550671 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConceptScore W2557648318C53839665 @default.
- W2557648318 hasConceptScore W2557648318C71924100 @default.
- W2557648318 hasLocation W25576483181 @default.
- W2557648318 hasOpenAccess W2557648318 @default.
- W2557648318 hasPrimaryLocation W25576483181 @default.
- W2557648318 hasRelatedWork W1990671466 @default.
- W2557648318 hasRelatedWork W2205950389 @default.
- W2557648318 hasRelatedWork W2256128204 @default.
- W2557648318 hasRelatedWork W2557648318 @default.
- W2557648318 hasRelatedWork W2590256939 @default.
- W2557648318 hasRelatedWork W2796456277 @default.
- W2557648318 hasRelatedWork W2966691835 @default.
- W2557648318 hasRelatedWork W3174155365 @default.
- W2557648318 hasRelatedWork W4232295777 @default.
- W2557648318 hasRelatedWork W85821941 @default.
- W2557648318 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2557648318 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2557648318 magId "2557648318" @default.
- W2557648318 workType "article" @default.