Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2557674987> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2557674987 endingPage "12156" @default.
- W2557674987 startingPage "12144" @default.
- W2557674987 abstract "The cerebral cortex of the mouse has become one of the most important systems for studying information processing and the neural correlates of behavior. Multiple studies have examined the first stages of visual cortical processing: primary visual cortex (V1) and its thalamic inputs from the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN), but more rarely in the lateral posterior nucleus (LP) in mice. Multiple single-unit surveys of dLGN and V1, both with electrophysiology and two-photon calcium imaging, have described receptive fields in anesthetized animals. Increasingly, awake animals are being used in physiological studies, so it is important to compare neuronal responses between awake and anesthetized state. We have performed a comprehensive survey of spatial and temporal response properties in V1, dLGN, and lateral posterior nucleus of both anesthetized and awake animals, using a common set of stimuli: drifting sine-wave gratings spanning a broad range of spatial and temporal parameters, and sparse noise stimuli consisting of flashed light and dark squares. Most qualitative receptive field parameters were found to be unchanged between the two states, such as most aspects of spatial processing, but there were significant differences in several parameters, most notably in temporal processing. Compared with anesthetized animals, the temporal frequency that evoked the peak response was shifted toward higher values in the dLGN of awake mice and responses were more sustained. Further, the peak response to a flashed stimulus was earlier in all three areas. Overall, however, receptive field properties in the anesthetized animal remain a good model for those in the awake animal.The primary visual cortex (V1) of the mouse and its inputs from visual thalamus (dLGN), have become a dominant model for studying information processing in the brain. Early surveys of visual response properties (receptive fields) were performed in anesthetized animals. Although most recent studies of V1 have been performed in awake animals to examine links between vision and behavior, there have been few comprehensive studies of receptive field properties in the awake mouse, especially in dLGN and lateral posterior nucleus. We have performed a comparative survey of receptive fields in dLGN, lateral posterior nucleus, and V1 in anesthetized and awake mice. We found multiple differences in processing of time-varying stimuli, whereas the spatial aspects of receptive fields remain comparatively unchanged." @default.
- W2557674987 created "2016-12-08" @default.
- W2557674987 creator A5000656933 @default.
- W2557674987 creator A5005494448 @default.
- W2557674987 creator A5037307796 @default.
- W2557674987 creator A5044384795 @default.
- W2557674987 creator A5072126704 @default.
- W2557674987 creator A5088020229 @default.
- W2557674987 date "2016-11-30" @default.
- W2557674987 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
- W2557674987 title "A Comparison of Visual Response Properties in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus and Primary Visual Cortex of Awake and Anesthetized Mice" @default.
- W2557674987 cites W1507393098 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W1518805832 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W1521319725 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W1860783201 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W1914401667 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W1928048789 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W1946515796 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W1963989925 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W1964180894 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W1964694219 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W1964738011 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W1972869628 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W1976495143 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W1977168943 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W1981372873 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W1983080720 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W1983383727 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W1988139867 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W1988697672 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W1988849438 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W1997953085 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2003164557 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2013422844 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2015147756 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2018085295 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2018830762 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2019677951 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2022491393 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2026928404 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2028616747 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2030345583 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2039814229 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2040609306 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2043000105 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2048962026 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2051526952 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2052364473 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2055569767 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2056378699 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2058670155 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2059829044 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2061469173 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2061681507 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2073472689 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2086871516 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2088358935 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2090993647 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2096519870 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2103212315 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2111624873 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2114747787 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2115656514 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2116360511 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2118012081 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2123491442 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2141964964 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2143049676 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2148336939 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2151643908 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2209706276 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2230830804 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2268167340 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2287431041 @default.
- W2557674987 cites W2408614855 @default.
- W2557674987 doi "https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1741-16.2016" @default.
- W2557674987 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5148216" @default.
- W2557674987 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27903724" @default.
- W2557674987 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W2557674987 type Work @default.
- W2557674987 sameAs 2557674987 @default.
- W2557674987 citedByCount "123" @default.
- W2557674987 countsByYear W25576749872017 @default.
- W2557674987 countsByYear W25576749872018 @default.
- W2557674987 countsByYear W25576749872019 @default.
- W2557674987 countsByYear W25576749872020 @default.
- W2557674987 countsByYear W25576749872021 @default.
- W2557674987 countsByYear W25576749872022 @default.
- W2557674987 countsByYear W25576749872023 @default.
- W2557674987 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2557674987 hasAuthorship W2557674987A5000656933 @default.
- W2557674987 hasAuthorship W2557674987A5005494448 @default.
- W2557674987 hasAuthorship W2557674987A5037307796 @default.
- W2557674987 hasAuthorship W2557674987A5044384795 @default.
- W2557674987 hasAuthorship W2557674987A5072126704 @default.
- W2557674987 hasAuthorship W2557674987A5088020229 @default.
- W2557674987 hasBestOaLocation W25576749871 @default.
- W2557674987 hasConcept C117838684 @default.