FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2559853671> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2559853671 abstract "When forensic scientists evaluate and report on the probative strength of single DNA traces, they commonly rely on only one number, expressing the rarity of the DNA profile in the population of interest. This is so because the focus is on propositions regarding the source of the recovered trace material, such as ‘the person of interest is the source of the crime stain’. In particular, when the alternative proposition is ‘an unknown person is the source of the crime stain’, one is directed to think about the rarity of the profile. However, in the era of DNA profiling technology capable of producing results from small quantities of trace material (i.e., non-visible staining) that is subject to easy and ubiquitous modes of transfer, the issue of source is becoming less central, to the point that it is often not contested. There is now a shift from the question ‘whose DNA is this?’ to the question ‘how did it get there?’. As a consequence, recipients of expert information are now very much in need of assistance with the evaluation of the meaning and probative strength of DNA profiling results when the competing propositions of interest refer to different activities. This need is widely demonstrated in day-to-day forensic practice and is also voiced in specialized literature. Yet many forensic scientists remain reluctant to assess their results given propositions that relate to different activities. Some scientists consider evaluations beyond the issue of source as being overly speculative, because of the lack of relevant data and knowledge regarding phenomena and mechanisms of transfer, persistence and background of DNA. Similarly, encouragements to deal with these activity issues, expressed in a recently released European guideline on evaluative reporting [42], which highlights the need for rethinking current practice, are sometimes viewed skeptically or are not considered feasible. In this discussion paper, we select and discuss recurrent skeptical views brought to our attention, as well as some of the alternative solutions that have been suggested." @default.
• W2559853671 created "2016-12-16" @default.
• W2559853671 creator A5011620458 @default.
• W2559853671 creator A5015021900 @default.
• W2559853671 creator A5016287139 @default.
• W2559853671 creator A5022608239 @default.
• W2559853671 creator A5037451902 @default.
• W2559853671 creator A5038464134 @default.
• W2559853671 creator A5045461082 @default.
• W2559853671 creator A5068267685 @default.
• W2559853671 creator A5071387474 @default.
• W2559853671 creator A5086513981 @default.
• W2559853671 date "2016-12-12" @default.
• W2559853671 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2559853671 title "Evaluation of Forensic DNA Traces When Propositions of Interest Relate to Activities: Analysis and Discussion of Recurrent Concerns" @default.
• W2559853671 cites W1194833722 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W1486612074 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W1977836471 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W1978754137 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2003107932 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2021457824 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2028786809 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2045423084 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2049611639 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2052671813 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2065637266 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2066052837 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2074718743 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2079046808 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2088684112 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2102257377 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2109862589 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2125517798 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2137099293 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2156665852 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2166983557 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2188978536 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2235867268 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2270612586 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2271343289 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2276589646 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2289263107 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2321350063 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2506542537 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W2796436783 @default.
• W2559853671 cites W3121559435 @default.
• W2559853671 doi "https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2016.00215" @default.
• W2559853671 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5149526" @default.
• W2559853671 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28018424" @default.
• W2559853671 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2559853671 type Work @default.
• W2559853671 sameAs 2559853671 @default.
• W2559853671 citedByCount "33" @default.
• W2559853671 countsByYear W25598536712017 @default.
• W2559853671 countsByYear W25598536712018 @default.
• W2559853671 countsByYear W25598536712019 @default.
• W2559853671 countsByYear W25598536712020 @default.
• W2559853671 countsByYear W25598536712021 @default.
• W2559853671 countsByYear W25598536712022 @default.
• W2559853671 countsByYear W25598536712023 @default.
• W2559853671 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2559853671 hasAuthorship W2559853671A5011620458 @default.
• W2559853671 hasAuthorship W2559853671A5015021900 @default.
• W2559853671 hasAuthorship W2559853671A5016287139 @default.
• W2559853671 hasAuthorship W2559853671A5022608239 @default.
• W2559853671 hasAuthorship W2559853671A5037451902 @default.
• W2559853671 hasAuthorship W2559853671A5038464134 @default.
• W2559853671 hasAuthorship W2559853671A5045461082 @default.
• W2559853671 hasAuthorship W2559853671A5068267685 @default.
• W2559853671 hasAuthorship W2559853671A5071387474 @default.
• W2559853671 hasAuthorship W2559853671A5086513981 @default.
• W2559853671 hasBestOaLocation W25598536711 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConcept C171906077 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConcept C187191949 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConcept C2777152325 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConcept C75291252 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConceptScore W2559853671C108827166 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConceptScore W2559853671C111472728 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConceptScore W2559853671C111919701 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConceptScore W2559853671C138885662 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConceptScore W2559853671C144024400 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConceptScore W2559853671C149923435 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConceptScore W2559853671C15744967 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConceptScore W2559853671C171906077 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConceptScore W2559853671C187191949 @default.
• W2559853671 hasConceptScore W2559853671C2522767166 @default.

• next