FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2560804542> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2560804542 endingPage "10" @default.
• W2560804542 startingPage "1" @default.
• W2560804542 abstract "Develop evidence-based recommendations for single-reviewer validation of electronic phenotyping results in operational settings. We conducted a randomized controlled study to evaluate whether electronic phenotyping results should be used to support manual chart review during single-reviewer electronic phenotyping validation (N = 3104). We evaluated the accuracy, duration and cost of manual chart review with and without the availability of electronic phenotyping results, including relevant patient-specific details. The cost of identification of an erroneous electronic phenotyping result was calculated based on the personnel time required for the initial chart review and subsequent adjudication of discrepancies between manual chart review results and electronic phenotype determinations. Providing electronic phenotyping results (vs not providing those results) was associated with improved overall accuracy of manual chart review (98.90% vs 92.46%, p < 0.001), decreased review duration per test case (62.43 vs 76.78 s, p < 0.001), and insignificantly reduced estimated marginal costs of identification of an erroneous electronic phenotyping result ($48.54 vs $63.56, p = 0.16). The agreement between chart review and electronic phenotyping results was higher when the phenotyping results were provided (Cohen’s kappa 0.98 vs 0.88, p < 0.001). As a result, while accuracy improved when initial electronic phenotyping results were correct (99.74% vs 92.67%, N = 3049, p < 0.001), there was a trend towards decreased accuracy when initial electronic phenotyping results were erroneous (56.67% vs 80.00%, N = 55, p = 0.07). Electronic phenotyping results provided the greatest benefit for the accurate identification of rare exclusion criteria. Single-reviewer chart review of electronic phenotyping can be conducted more accurately, quickly, and at lower cost when supported by electronic phenotyping results. However, human reviewers tend to agree with electronic phenotyping results even when those results are wrong. Thus, the value of providing electronic phenotyping results depends on the accuracy of the underlying electronic phenotyping algorithm. We recommend using a mix of phenotyping validation strategies, with the balance of strategies based on the anticipated electronic phenotyping error rate, the tolerance for missed electronic phenotyping errors, as well as the expertise, cost, and availability of personnel involved in chart review and discrepancy adjudication." @default.
• W2560804542 created "2016-12-16" @default.
• W2560804542 creator A5004490595 @default.
• W2560804542 creator A5033267515 @default.
• W2560804542 creator A5035489750 @default.
• W2560804542 creator A5041207686 @default.
• W2560804542 creator A5042057313 @default.
• W2560804542 creator A5042366259 @default.
• W2560804542 creator A5059311351 @default.
• W2560804542 creator A5090842019 @default.
• W2560804542 date "2017-02-01" @default.
• W2560804542 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2560804542 title "Single-reviewer electronic phenotyping validation in operational settings: Comparison of strategies and recommendations" @default.
• W2560804542 cites W1497319302 @default.
• W2560804542 cites W1541322638 @default.
• W2560804542 cites W1930458234 @default.
• W2560804542 cites W1971040337 @default.
• W2560804542 cites W2033222106 @default.
• W2560804542 cites W2033791148 @default.
• W2560804542 cites W2038049252 @default.
• W2560804542 cites W2047955590 @default.
• W2560804542 cites W2100676408 @default.
• W2560804542 cites W2113952938 @default.
• W2560804542 cites W2115441252 @default.
• W2560804542 cites W2122019985 @default.
• W2560804542 cites W2125058947 @default.
• W2560804542 cites W2131668595 @default.
• W2560804542 cites W2151068025 @default.
• W2560804542 cites W2164205487 @default.
• W2560804542 cites W2167304100 @default.
• W2560804542 cites W2168769804 @default.
• W2560804542 cites W2222380211 @default.
• W2560804542 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2016.12.004" @default.
• W2560804542 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27956265" @default.
• W2560804542 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2560804542 type Work @default.
• W2560804542 sameAs 2560804542 @default.
• W2560804542 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2560804542 countsByYear W25608045422019 @default.
• W2560804542 countsByYear W25608045422021 @default.
• W2560804542 countsByYear W25608045422022 @default.
• W2560804542 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2560804542 hasAuthorship W2560804542A5004490595 @default.
• W2560804542 hasAuthorship W2560804542A5033267515 @default.
• W2560804542 hasAuthorship W2560804542A5035489750 @default.
• W2560804542 hasAuthorship W2560804542A5041207686 @default.
• W2560804542 hasAuthorship W2560804542A5042057313 @default.
• W2560804542 hasAuthorship W2560804542A5042366259 @default.
• W2560804542 hasAuthorship W2560804542A5059311351 @default.
• W2560804542 hasAuthorship W2560804542A5090842019 @default.
• W2560804542 hasBestOaLocation W25608045421 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConcept C116834253 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConcept C163864269 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConcept C190812933 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConcept C23123220 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConcept C2989037723 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConcept C3017907426 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConceptScore W2560804542C105795698 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConceptScore W2560804542C116834253 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConceptScore W2560804542C119857082 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConceptScore W2560804542C163864269 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConceptScore W2560804542C190812933 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConceptScore W2560804542C23123220 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConceptScore W2560804542C2989037723 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConceptScore W2560804542C3017907426 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConceptScore W2560804542C33923547 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConceptScore W2560804542C41008148 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConceptScore W2560804542C59822182 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConceptScore W2560804542C71924100 @default.
• W2560804542 hasConceptScore W2560804542C86803240 @default.
• W2560804542 hasLocation W25608045421 @default.
• W2560804542 hasLocation W25608045422 @default.
• W2560804542 hasOpenAccess W2560804542 @default.
• W2560804542 hasPrimaryLocation W25608045421 @default.
• W2560804542 hasRelatedWork W2017369055 @default.
• W2560804542 hasRelatedWork W2081965252 @default.
• W2560804542 hasRelatedWork W2176207712 @default.
• W2560804542 hasRelatedWork W2218142399 @default.
• W2560804542 hasRelatedWork W2341270663 @default.
• W2560804542 hasRelatedWork W2374049727 @default.
• W2560804542 hasRelatedWork W2380467401 @default.
• W2560804542 hasRelatedWork W2389807863 @default.
• W2560804542 hasRelatedWork W2768992605 @default.
• W2560804542 hasRelatedWork W2782446623 @default.
• W2560804542 hasVolume "66" @default.
• W2560804542 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2560804542 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2560804542 magId "2560804542" @default.
• W2560804542 workType "article" @default.