FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2560852810> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2560852810 endingPage "e000110" @default.
• W2560852810 startingPage "e000110" @default.
• W2560852810 abstract "•Find more ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines under: http://www.esmo.org/Guidelines •Find more ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines under: http://www.esmo.org/Guidelines Laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of right colon cancer has rapidly evolved over the past few years. This procedure is considered as feasible and effective in terms of short-term and long-term outcomes. Laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) is performed by a small number of surgeons and, in most of cases, it was performed with an extracorporeal anastomosis.1.Milone M. Elmore U. Di Salvo E. et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers.Surg Endosc. 2015; 29: 2314-2320doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3950-7Crossref PubMed Scopus (102) Google Scholar The recent ESMO guidelines with a Level of Evidence (LE) IV reported that for right-sided colonic cancers, the benefits of laparoscopic approach are less obvious since anastomosis must be hand sewn, which requires a laparotomy.2.Labianca R. Nordlinger B. Beretta G.D. ESMO Guidelines Working Group et al.Early colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.Ann Oncol. 2013; 24: vi64-72doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt354Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (654) Google Scholar The current state of the art for the treatment of the right colon cancers as reported by Fabozzi et al.3.Fabozzi M. Cirillo P. Corcione F. Surgical approach to right colon cancer: From open technique to robot. State of art.World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016; 8: 564-573Crossref PubMed Google Scholar in their papers, by right laparoscopic colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis despite the technical challenging. However, in the past few years, many studies comparing the intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) versus the extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) in LRC were conducted1.Milone M. Elmore U. Di Salvo E. et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers.Surg Endosc. 2015; 29: 2314-2320doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3950-7Crossref PubMed Scopus (102) Google Scholar4.Svan Oostendorp, AElfrink, WBorstlap, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg EndoscEpub ahead of print: 10 Jun 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4982-yGoogle Scholar, 5.Hanna M.H. Hwang G.S. Phelan M.J. et al.Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: short- and long-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis.Surg Endosc. 2016; 30: 3933-3942Crossref PubMed Scopus (53) Google Scholar, 6.Shapiro R. Keler U. Segev L. et al.Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: short- and long-term benefits in comparison with extracorporeal anastomosis.Surg Endosc. 2016; 30: 3823-3829Crossref PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar, 7.JAbrisqueta, NIban˜ ez, JLuján, et al. Intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in patients with laparoscopic right. Surg Endosc; 30:65–72.Google Scholar, 8.CRicci, RCasadei, VAlagna, et al. A critical and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. Epub ahead of print: 5 Sep 2016. DOI:10.1007/s00423-016-1509-xGoogle Scholar with a higher level of evidence. These papers assessed short-term and long-term outcomes of LRC. Milone et al1.Milone M. Elmore U. Di Salvo E. et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers.Surg Endosc. 2015; 29: 2314-2320doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3950-7Crossref PubMed Scopus (102) Google Scholar in their multicentric, comparative and prospective study (LE III) evaluated the safety of IA versus EA in 512 patients submitted to an LCR. They concluded that the IA represents the better way to perform the anastomosis after LRC. van Oostendorp et al4.Svan Oostendorp, AElfrink, WBorstlap, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg EndoscEpub ahead of print: 10 Jun 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4982-yGoogle Scholar in their meta-analysis of about 24 non-randomised studies comparing IA versus EA reported morbidity, mortality and length of stay; moreover, they also investigated the rates of anastomotic leak rate, ileus, incisional surgical site infection (SSI) and incisional hernia, concluding that IA in LRC is associated with reduced short-term morbidity and decreased length of hospital stay suggesting faster recovery. Hanna et al5.Hanna M.H. Hwang G.S. Phelan M.J. et al.Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: short- and long-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis.Surg Endosc. 2016; 30: 3933-3942Crossref PubMed Scopus (53) Google Scholar in their retrospective multicentre study of about 195 patients evaluated both long and short terms outcomes, with a follow-up of 5.7 years, concluding that IA in LRC is associated with similar postoperative and oncologic outcomes compared to EA. Furthermore, IA may overcomes the EA about many advantages in terms of flexibility of specimen extraction, even if it burdened by a higher rate of minor complications (Grade II of Dindo classification). In another prospective study (LE III) published by Shapiro et al,6.Shapiro R. Keler U. Segev L. et al.Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: short- and long-term benefits in comparison with extracorporeal anastomosis.Surg Endosc. 2016; 30: 3823-3829Crossref PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar a total of 191 consecutive patients who underwent LRC for neoplasm with IA and EA were evaluated. The mean follow up for the two group of patients was 33.7 months for EA group and 28.8 months for IA one. They evaluated both short and long terms outcomes. They concluded that LRC with IA were associated with improved short- and long-term outcomes. The rates of postoperative complications requiring intervention and incisional hernias were decreased. Abrisqueta et al7.JAbrisqueta, NIban˜ ez, JLuján, et al. Intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in patients with laparoscopic right. Surg Endosc; 30:65–72.Google Scholar in their retrospective study of 173 patients concluded that the IA represent a safe and feasible alternative for creating an ileo-colic anastomosis. It involves a similar rate of complications and may prevent some of the drawbacks presented by EA. The most relevant data highlighted by previous studies1.Milone M. Elmore U. Di Salvo E. et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers.Surg Endosc. 2015; 29: 2314-2320doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3950-7Crossref PubMed Scopus (102) Google Scholar4.Svan Oostendorp, AElfrink, WBorstlap, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg EndoscEpub ahead of print: 10 Jun 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4982-yGoogle Scholar, 5.Hanna M.H. Hwang G.S. Phelan M.J. et al.Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: short- and long-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis.Surg Endosc. 2016; 30: 3933-3942Crossref PubMed Scopus (53) Google Scholar, 6.Shapiro R. Keler U. Segev L. et al.Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: short- and long-term benefits in comparison with extracorporeal anastomosis.Surg Endosc. 2016; 30: 3823-3829Crossref PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar, 7.JAbrisqueta, NIban˜ ez, JLuján, et al. Intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in patients with laparoscopic right. Surg Endosc; 30:65–72.Google Scholar is the reduction of the operating time and reduction of incisional hernias in the groups treated with IA anastomosis ensuring in any case adequate oncological outcomes. These data are consistent with the conclusions of a recent meta-analysis.8.CRicci, RCasadei, VAlagna, et al. A critical and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. Epub ahead of print: 5 Sep 2016. DOI:10.1007/s00423-016-1509-xGoogle Scholar Out of a total of 1717 patients, the authors confirmed that LCR with IA is a safe alternative to EA. However, each of the previous studies does not provide for the highest level of evidence but in any case provides that LCR can be effectively performed through an IA. More generally, there is a broad consensus in the surgical current practice9.Arezzo A. Passera R. Ferri V. et al.Laparoscopic right colectomy reduces short-term mortality and morbidity. Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015; 30: 1457-1472Crossref PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar that a laparoscopic approach for the treatment of a right colon cancer overcomes a laparotomic approach in terms of morbidity and mortality, although well-structured randomised trials are desirable about this issue. Also three different meta-analyses from 2013 to the present4.Svan Oostendorp, AElfrink, WBorstlap, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg EndoscEpub ahead of print: 10 Jun 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4982-yGoogle Scholar10.Vignali A. Bissolati M. De Nardi P. et al.Extracorporeal vs.Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 26. An Interim Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial, Intracorporeal Ileocolic Stapled Anastomoses in Laparoscopic Right Colectomy2016: 343-348Google Scholar11.Feroci F. Lenzi E. Garzi A. et al.Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013; 28: 1177-1186Crossref PubMed Scopus (81) Google Scholar report as the laparoscopic approach in right colectomies for cancer is comparable to the open approach and also the intracorporeal anastomosis has advantages in terms of short and long terms outcomes, with a reduction of incision hernia. In conclusion at best of our knowledge laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis is technically feasible and reproducible, ensuring all advantages of laparoscopy over the open approach. Moreover, every study reports no differences in oncological outcomes between the open and laparoscopic approach. Intracorporeal anastomosis also ensure a reduction of incisional hernia in long term outcomes." @default.
• W2560852810 created "2017-01-06" @default.
• W2560852810 creator A5019376388 @default.
• W2560852810 creator A5025378047 @default.
• W2560852810 creator A5083915891 @default.
• W2560852810 creator A5088961630 @default.
• W2560852810 date "2016-01-01" @default.
• W2560852810 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2560852810 title "Reply to Early colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up" @default.
• W2560852810 cites W1980766650 @default.
• W2560852810 cites W2014884509 @default.
• W2560852810 cites W2065007110 @default.
• W2560852810 cites W2119938514 @default.
• W2560852810 cites W2190979271 @default.
• W2560852810 cites W2276764225 @default.
• W2560852810 cites W2411559209 @default.
• W2560852810 cites W2416295769 @default.
• W2560852810 cites W2510303040 @default.
• W2560852810 cites W813558435 @default.
• W2560852810 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000110" @default.
• W2560852810 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5174787" @default.
• W2560852810 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28255453" @default.
• W2560852810 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2560852810 type Work @default.
• W2560852810 sameAs 2560852810 @default.
• W2560852810 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2560852810 countsByYear W25608528102018 @default.
• W2560852810 countsByYear W25608528102019 @default.
• W2560852810 countsByYear W25608528102020 @default.
• W2560852810 countsByYear W25608528102021 @default.
• W2560852810 countsByYear W25608528102023 @default.
• W2560852810 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2560852810 hasAuthorship W2560852810A5019376388 @default.
• W2560852810 hasAuthorship W2560852810A5025378047 @default.
• W2560852810 hasAuthorship W2560852810A5083915891 @default.
• W2560852810 hasAuthorship W2560852810A5088961630 @default.
• W2560852810 hasBestOaLocation W25608528101 @default.
• W2560852810 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2560852810 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2560852810 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W2560852810 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2560852810 hasConcept C2779974597 @default.
• W2560852810 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2560852810 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2560852810 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2560852810 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2560852810 hasConceptScore W2560852810C121608353 @default.
• W2560852810 hasConceptScore W2560852810C126322002 @default.
• W2560852810 hasConceptScore W2560852810C143998085 @default.
• W2560852810 hasConceptScore W2560852810C19527891 @default.
• W2560852810 hasConceptScore W2560852810C2779974597 @default.
• W2560852810 hasConceptScore W2560852810C512399662 @default.
• W2560852810 hasConceptScore W2560852810C526805850 @default.
• W2560852810 hasConceptScore W2560852810C61434518 @default.
• W2560852810 hasConceptScore W2560852810C71924100 @default.
• W2560852810 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2560852810 hasLocation W25608528101 @default.
• W2560852810 hasLocation W25608528102 @default.
• W2560852810 hasLocation W25608528103 @default.
• W2560852810 hasOpenAccess W2560852810 @default.
• W2560852810 hasPrimaryLocation W25608528101 @default.
• W2560852810 hasRelatedWork W2019250753 @default.
• W2560852810 hasRelatedWork W2102644969 @default.
• W2560852810 hasRelatedWork W2392730113 @default.
• W2560852810 hasRelatedWork W2409949902 @default.
• W2560852810 hasRelatedWork W2783129026 @default.
• W2560852810 hasRelatedWork W3004259476 @default.
• W2560852810 hasRelatedWork W3039284339 @default.
• W2560852810 hasRelatedWork W3208701539 @default.
• W2560852810 hasRelatedWork W4313346385 @default.
• W2560852810 hasRelatedWork W4317816533 @default.
• W2560852810 hasVolume "1" @default.
• W2560852810 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2560852810 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2560852810 magId "2560852810" @default.
• W2560852810 workType "article" @default.