FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2561575569> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2561575569 endingPage "A84" @default.
• W2561575569 startingPage "A83.2" @default.
• W2561575569 abstract "<h3>Introduction</h3> Rigid sigmoidoscopy is an invasive lower gastrointestinal investigation. It requires good communication and procedural skills and knowledge of relevant anatomy and pathology. However, there is no formal structure for training and assessment of this procedure in England and Wales. There are advocates for phasing it out in favour of better access to flexible sigmoidoscopy especially in view of reduced waiting times for this procedure. However rigid sigmoidoscopy is still frequently performed in outpatient and inpatient settings and therefore as with all clinical procedures training requirements should be standardised nationally. <h3>Methods</h3> This study aims to assess gastroenterology and general surgery trainees9 experience and training in the use of rigid sigmoidoscopy. An Internet survey was distributed via the Regional Training Programme Directors for all gastroenterology trainees in England and Wales and all general surgery trainees in England. <h3>Results</h3> There were 74 responses. 46% were gastroenterology trainees and 54% were surgical trainees (of these 35% were colorectal surgery trainees). There was an even representation of different stages in training: ST3 19%, ST4 24%, Year 3 16%, Year 4 15%, Year 5 9% and Out of Programme 16%. 46% of trainees had performed >100 rigid sigmoidoscopies and only 12% <10. 62% had been supervised in performing 1 to 5 procedures but 18% had never been supervised. 85% took verbal and 4% written consent but 62% did not inform patients about the risk of haemorrhage and perforation. No trainee surveyed had ever attended a formal training course and 88% had never had either a formative or summative Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) assessment. Despite this, 55% of trainees felt that their training was adequate and 5% that it was excellent. 40% felt that training was either insufficient or non-existent. For future trainees 53% did not feel any formal training was necessary, 35% thought that formative and summative DOPS assessments would be beneficial and 7% wanted a training course with a further 4% wanting both a training course and DOPS assessments. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Rigid sigmoidoscopy is a widely used procedural skill among general surgery and gastroenterology trainees. This survey highlights some worrying facts: a large proportion of current trainees were never supervised when first learning the procedure and although the majority take some form of consent, 62% do not inform the patients of the relevant risks of the procedure. While the response rate was disappointing (5.6%), this study clearly suggests a need for structured training and assessment in rigid sigmoidoscopy and improved availability of training courses throughout England and Wales." @default.
• W2561575569 created "2017-01-06" @default.
• W2561575569 creator A5069086399 @default.
• W2561575569 creator A5072219713 @default.
• W2561575569 date "2010-04-01" @default.
• W2561575569 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2561575569 title "PTU-085 Rigid sigmoidoscopy: widely used but poorly taught. A survey of UK surgical and medical gastroenterology trainees" @default.
• W2561575569 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2009.209072s" @default.
• W2561575569 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2561575569 type Work @default.
• W2561575569 sameAs 2561575569 @default.
• W2561575569 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2561575569 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2561575569 hasAuthorship W2561575569A5069086399 @default.
• W2561575569 hasAuthorship W2561575569A5072219713 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConcept C2778456384 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConcept C2778527123 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConcept C2779896975 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConceptScore W2561575569C121608353 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConceptScore W2561575569C126322002 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConceptScore W2561575569C191897082 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConceptScore W2561575569C192562407 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConceptScore W2561575569C2778435480 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConceptScore W2561575569C2778456384 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConceptScore W2561575569C2778527123 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConceptScore W2561575569C2779896975 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConceptScore W2561575569C512399662 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConceptScore W2561575569C526805850 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConceptScore W2561575569C61434518 @default.
• W2561575569 hasConceptScore W2561575569C71924100 @default.
• W2561575569 hasIssue "Suppl 1" @default.
• W2561575569 hasLocation W25615755691 @default.
• W2561575569 hasOpenAccess W2561575569 @default.
• W2561575569 hasPrimaryLocation W25615755691 @default.
• W2561575569 hasRelatedWork W1979000078 @default.
• W2561575569 hasRelatedWork W2127324220 @default.
• W2561575569 hasRelatedWork W2338874948 @default.
• W2561575569 hasRelatedWork W2354797433 @default.
• W2561575569 hasRelatedWork W2357145431 @default.
• W2561575569 hasRelatedWork W2357183586 @default.
• W2561575569 hasRelatedWork W2357302207 @default.
• W2561575569 hasRelatedWork W2359396505 @default.
• W2561575569 hasRelatedWork W2365767471 @default.
• W2561575569 hasRelatedWork W2404259405 @default.
• W2561575569 hasVolume "59" @default.
• W2561575569 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2561575569 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2561575569 magId "2561575569" @default.
• W2561575569 workType "article" @default.