FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2562841609> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2562841609 endingPage "45" @default.
• W2562841609 startingPage "33" @default.
• W2562841609 abstract "Abstract Background Makkah (Mecca) is a holy city located in the western region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Each year, millions of pilgrims visit Makkah. These numbers impact both routine health care delivery and disaster response. This study aimed to evaluate hospitals’ disaster plans in the city of Makkah. Methods Study investigators administered a questionnaire survey to 17 hospitals in the city of Makkah. Data on hospital characteristics and three key domains of disaster plans (general evaluation of disaster planning, structural feasibility of the hospitals, and health care worker knowledge and training) were collated and analyzed. Results A response rate of 82% (n=14) was attained. Ten (71%) of the hospitals were government hospitals, whereas four were private hospitals. Eleven (79%) hospitals had a capacity of less than 300 beds. Only nine (64%) hospitals reviewed their disaster plan within the preceding two years. Nine (64%) respondents were drilling for disasters at least twice per year. The majority of hospitals did not rely on a hazard vulnerability analysis (HVA) to develop their Emergency Operations Plan. Eleven (79%) hospitals had the Hospital Incident Command Systems (HICS) present in their plans. All hospitals described availability of some supplies required for the first 24 hours of a disaster response, such as: N95 masks, antidotes for nerve agents, and antiviral medications. Only five (36%) hospitals had a designated decontamination area. Nine (64%) hospitals reported ability to re-designate inpatient wards into an intensive care unit (ICU) format. Only seven (50%) respondents had a protocol for increasing availability of isolation rooms to prevent the spread of airborne infection. Ten (71%) hospitals had a designated disaster-training program for health care workers. Conclusions Makkah has experienced multiple disaster incidents over the last decade. The present research suggests that Makkah hospitals are insufficiently prepared for potential future disasters. This may represent a considerable threat to the health of both residents and visitors to Makkah. This study demonstrated that there is significant room for improvement in most aspects of hospital Emergency Operations Plans, in particular: reviewing the plan and increasing the frequency of multi-agency and multi-hospital drills. Preparedness for terrorism utilizing chemical, biologic, radiation, nuclear, explosion (CBRNE) and infectious diseases was found to be sub-optimal and should be assessed further. Al-Shareef AS , Alsulimani LK , Bojan HM , Masri TM , Grimes JO , Molloy MS , Ciottone GR . Evaluation of hospitals’ disaster preparedness plans in the holy city of Makkah (Mecca): a cross-sectional observation study . Prehosp Disaster Med . 2017 ; 32 ( 1 ): 33 – 45 ." @default.
• W2562841609 created "2017-01-06" @default.
• W2562841609 creator A5006742559 @default.
• W2562841609 creator A5011009557 @default.
• W2562841609 creator A5022753103 @default.
• W2562841609 creator A5030410173 @default.
• W2562841609 creator A5030565702 @default.
• W2562841609 creator A5041096818 @default.
• W2562841609 creator A5050509367 @default.
• W2562841609 date "2016-12-14" @default.
• W2562841609 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2562841609 title "Evaluation of Hospitals’ Disaster Preparedness Plans in the Holy City of Makkah (Mecca): A Cross-Sectional Observation Study" @default.
• W2562841609 cites W1975252830 @default.
• W2562841609 cites W1976792962 @default.
• W2562841609 cites W1995696847 @default.
• W2562841609 cites W2002771007 @default.
• W2562841609 cites W2022008687 @default.
• W2562841609 cites W2061825092 @default.
• W2562841609 cites W2095233770 @default.
• W2562841609 cites W2097616691 @default.
• W2562841609 cites W2100785440 @default.
• W2562841609 cites W2107235854 @default.
• W2562841609 cites W2111850024 @default.
• W2562841609 cites W2112201623 @default.
• W2562841609 cites W2140217211 @default.
• W2562841609 cites W2166860285 @default.
• W2562841609 cites W2169048217 @default.
• W2562841609 cites W2562841609 @default.
• W2562841609 cites W4206571277 @default.
• W2562841609 doi "https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x16001229" @default.
• W2562841609 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27964768" @default.
• W2562841609 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2562841609 type Work @default.
• W2562841609 sameAs 2562841609 @default.
• W2562841609 citedByCount "24" @default.
• W2562841609 countsByYear W25628416092016 @default.
• W2562841609 countsByYear W25628416092018 @default.
• W2562841609 countsByYear W25628416092019 @default.
• W2562841609 countsByYear W25628416092020 @default.
• W2562841609 countsByYear W25628416092021 @default.
• W2562841609 countsByYear W25628416092022 @default.
• W2562841609 countsByYear W25628416092023 @default.
• W2562841609 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2562841609 hasAuthorship W2562841609A5006742559 @default.
• W2562841609 hasAuthorship W2562841609A5011009557 @default.
• W2562841609 hasAuthorship W2562841609A5022753103 @default.
• W2562841609 hasAuthorship W2562841609A5030410173 @default.
• W2562841609 hasAuthorship W2562841609A5030565702 @default.
• W2562841609 hasAuthorship W2562841609A5041096818 @default.
• W2562841609 hasAuthorship W2562841609A5050509367 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConcept C2777042776 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConcept C2779272995 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConcept C3017944768 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConcept C526869908 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConceptScore W2562841609C138885662 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConceptScore W2562841609C160735492 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConceptScore W2562841609C162324750 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConceptScore W2562841609C17744445 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConceptScore W2562841609C194828623 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConceptScore W2562841609C199539241 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConceptScore W2562841609C2777042776 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConceptScore W2562841609C2778137410 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConceptScore W2562841609C2779272995 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConceptScore W2562841609C3017944768 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConceptScore W2562841609C41895202 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConceptScore W2562841609C50522688 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConceptScore W2562841609C526869908 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConceptScore W2562841609C545542383 @default.
• W2562841609 hasConceptScore W2562841609C71924100 @default.
• W2562841609 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2562841609 hasLocation W25628416091 @default.
• W2562841609 hasLocation W25628416092 @default.
• W2562841609 hasOpenAccess W2562841609 @default.
• W2562841609 hasPrimaryLocation W25628416091 @default.
• W2562841609 hasRelatedWork W1979093416 @default.
• W2562841609 hasRelatedWork W2049750330 @default.
• W2562841609 hasRelatedWork W2122225796 @default.
• W2562841609 hasRelatedWork W2168240324 @default.
• W2562841609 hasRelatedWork W2895575302 @default.
• W2562841609 hasRelatedWork W2997151933 @default.
• W2562841609 hasRelatedWork W3012224913 @default.
• W2562841609 hasRelatedWork W3018119167 @default.
• W2562841609 hasRelatedWork W3043028265 @default.
• W2562841609 hasRelatedWork W636008987 @default.
• W2562841609 hasVolume "32" @default.
• W2562841609 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2562841609 isRetracted "false" @default.

• next