FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W256316621> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W256316621 startingPage "90" @default.
• W256316621 abstract "At a time when information on new treatments is rapidly growing, yet clinical resources and reimbursement appear to be shrinking, clinicians are challenged to identify the interventions that are best supported by the research literature. This challenge is particularly daunting in the field of geriatric mental health primarily because the number of well-designed treatment studies is relatively small, and treatments generally designed for younger people must be applied to a geriatric population, which may respond in a very different way For example, psychotherapeutic interventions may function differently in older people because of age-related changes in cognition and psychological development. Also, pharmacological response rates are known to vary in response to a variety of age-associated physiological changes and the complications of medication side-effects associated with concurrent medical conditions and interactions between drugs (Banerjee and Dickinson, 1997). Relying on reports of individual studies is risky, as it is often difficult to evaluate the quality of specific studies without training in research methodology. Evaluating the potential value of a given treatment becomes even more complex when considering multiple studies that together may present conflicting results and often have different samples, methods, and outcome measures. Fortunately, the challenge of sorting out the quality and significance of the research literature is well-recognized, and new techniques have been developed to summarize data from different studies and sources. When multiple studies of a specific treatment are evaluated, research findings can be aggregated and analyzed according to standardized methods and criteria to identify practices. While criteria vary, the underlying principles that define such practices include empirical support from randomized, controlled, well-designed studies with replication by different investigators using large, generalizable study samples (ACPR, 1993; Chambless and Ollendick, 2001). However, simply identifying evidence-based practices and developing guidelines is not sufficient to change what clinicians actually do. Innovative approaches must support the dissemination and implementation of these treatments in everyday practice, or usual care. The following discussion includes a brief overview of evidence-based reviews of the treatment literature, challenges and strategies for implementing evidence-based practices in routine clinical settings, and issues requiring further attention. EVIDENCE-BASED REVIEWS Treatments for major depression are the most frequently studied interventions in geriatric mental health and have the most empirical support. A number of evidence-based reviews, including estimates of effects based on multiple studies, have established effectiveness for both pharmacological and psychosocial therapies (Gatz et al., 1998; Gerson et al., 1999; Pinquart and Soerensen, Zoos; Thorpe et al., 2001; Wilson et al., 2001). More than half of older adults treated with antidepressants for major depression experience at least a So-percent reduction in depressive symptoms. Comparable efficacy and tolerability in older people have been reported for a number of antidepressants-tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (ssRis), and non-ssi norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (NSSRIS) (Wilson et al., 2001). Reviews of the psychosocial research literature establish cognitive behavioral therapy and interpersonal therapy as effective treatment modalities for geriatric depression. Other potentially effective interventions now emerging are individual behavior therapy, problem-solving therapy, brief psychodynamic therapy, and reminiscence therapy (Gatz et aL., 1998). When pharmacological and psychosocial interventions are used together, they are potentially more effective than either intervention alone in preventing the recurrence of major depression (U. …" @default.
• W256316621 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W256316621 creator A5022964434 @default.
• W256316621 creator A5073103603 @default.
• W256316621 creator A5078725789 @default.
• W256316621 date "2002-04-01" @default.
• W256316621 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W256316621 title "Implementing Evidence-Based Practices in Geriatric Mental Health" @default.
• W256316621 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W256316621 type Work @default.
• W256316621 sameAs 256316621 @default.
• W256316621 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W256316621 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W256316621 hasAuthorship W256316621A5022964434 @default.
• W256316621 hasAuthorship W256316621A5073103603 @default.
• W256316621 hasAuthorship W256316621A5078725789 @default.
• W256316621 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W256316621 hasConcept C134362201 @default.
• W256316621 hasConcept C136197465 @default.
• W256316621 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W256316621 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W256316621 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W256316621 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W256316621 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W256316621 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W256316621 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W256316621 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W256316621 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
• W256316621 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W256316621 hasConceptScore W256316621C118552586 @default.
• W256316621 hasConceptScore W256316621C134362201 @default.
• W256316621 hasConceptScore W256316621C136197465 @default.
• W256316621 hasConceptScore W256316621C154945302 @default.
• W256316621 hasConceptScore W256316621C15744967 @default.
• W256316621 hasConceptScore W256316621C159110408 @default.
• W256316621 hasConceptScore W256316621C27415008 @default.
• W256316621 hasConceptScore W256316621C2779951463 @default.
• W256316621 hasConceptScore W256316621C2908647359 @default.
• W256316621 hasConceptScore W256316621C41008148 @default.
• W256316621 hasConceptScore W256316621C71924100 @default.
• W256316621 hasConceptScore W256316621C74909509 @default.
• W256316621 hasConceptScore W256316621C99454951 @default.
• W256316621 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W256316621 hasLocation W2563166211 @default.
• W256316621 hasOpenAccess W256316621 @default.
• W256316621 hasPrimaryLocation W2563166211 @default.
• W256316621 hasRelatedWork W1537969071 @default.
• W256316621 hasRelatedWork W1557131227 @default.
• W256316621 hasRelatedWork W1670066690 @default.
• W256316621 hasRelatedWork W182304408 @default.
• W256316621 hasRelatedWork W1983515343 @default.
• W256316621 hasRelatedWork W1985644546 @default.
• W256316621 hasRelatedWork W2086204375 @default.
• W256316621 hasRelatedWork W2132657285 @default.
• W256316621 hasRelatedWork W2142155845 @default.
• W256316621 hasRelatedWork W2143048850 @default.
• W256316621 hasRelatedWork W2421449818 @default.
• W256316621 hasRelatedWork W2586602682 @default.
• W256316621 hasRelatedWork W2990207136 @default.
• W256316621 hasRelatedWork W3044786244 @default.
• W256316621 hasRelatedWork W3056989392 @default.
• W256316621 hasRelatedWork W3110781834 @default.
• W256316621 hasRelatedWork W3174025352 @default.
• W256316621 hasRelatedWork W3207759740 @default.
• W256316621 hasRelatedWork W2489060287 @default.
• W256316621 hasRelatedWork W2740682745 @default.
• W256316621 hasVolume "26" @default.
• W256316621 isParatext "false" @default.
• W256316621 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W256316621 magId "256316621" @default.
• W256316621 workType "article" @default.