FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2564467629> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2564467629 endingPage "450" @default.
• W2564467629 startingPage "437" @default.
• W2564467629 abstract "Purpose Amplitude‐based respiratory gating is known to capture the extent of respiratory motion ( RM ) accurately but results in residual motion in the presence of respiratory hysteresis. In our previous study, we proposed and developed a novel approach to account for respiratory hysteresis by applying the Bouc–Wen ( BW ) model of hysteresis to external surrogate signals of anterior/posterior motion of the abdomen and chest with respiration. In this work, using simulated and clinical SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging ( MPI ) studies, we investigate the effects of respiratory hysteresis and evaluate the benefit of correcting it using the proposed BW model in comparison with the abdomen signal typically employed clinically. Methods The MRI navigator data acquired in free‐breathing human volunteers were used in the specially modified 4D NCAT phantoms to allow simulating three types of respiratory patterns: monotonic, mild hysteresis, and strong hysteresis with normal myocardial uptake, and perfusion defects in the anterior, lateral, inferior, and septal locations of the mid‐ventricular wall. Clinical scans were performed using a Tc‐99m sestamibi MPI protocol while recording respiratory signals from thoracic and abdomen regions using a visual tracking system ( VTS ). The performance of the correction using the respiratory signals was assessed through polar map analysis in phantom and 10 clinical studies selected on the basis of having substantial RM . Results In phantom studies, simulations illustrating normal myocardial uptake showed significant differences ( P < 0.001) in the uniformity of the polar maps between the RM uncorrected and corrected. No significant differences were seen in the polar map uniformity across the RM corrections. Studies simulating perfusion defects showed significantly decreased errors ( P < 0.001) in defect severity and extent for the RM corrected compared to the uncorrected. Only for the strong hysteretic pattern, there was a significant difference ( P < 0.001) among the RM corrections. The errors in defect severity and extent for the RM correction using abdomen signal were significantly higher compared to that of the BW (severity = −4.0%, P < 0.001; extent = −65.4%, P < 0.01) and chest (severity = −4.1%, P < 0.001; extent = −52.5%, P < 0.01) signals. In clinical studies, the quantitative analysis of the polar maps demonstrated qualitative and quantitative but not statistically significant differences ( P = 0.73) between the correction methods that used the BW signal and the abdominal signal. Conclusions This study shows that hysteresis in respiration affects the extent of residual motion left in the RM ‐binned data, which can impact wall uniformity and the visualization of defects. Thus, there appears to be the potential for improved accuracy in reconstruction in the presence of hysteretic RM with the BW model method providing a possible step in the direction of improvement." @default.
• W2564467629 created "2017-01-06" @default.
• W2564467629 creator A5009406738 @default.
• W2564467629 creator A5013064030 @default.
• W2564467629 creator A5017592912 @default.
• W2564467629 creator A5037565667 @default.
• W2564467629 creator A5046139669 @default.
• W2564467629 creator A5075447974 @default.
• W2564467629 creator A5078748499 @default.
• W2564467629 date "2017-02-01" @default.
• W2564467629 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2564467629 title "Correction of hysteretic respiratory motion in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: Simulation and patient studies" @default.
• W2564467629 cites W1502230710 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W1508147193 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W1852481405 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W1928253500 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W1967754141 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W1969134936 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W1972585692 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W1978063497 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W1981281531 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W1984860322 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W1991447821 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W1992740553 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2018096492 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2021396393 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2028110020 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2036297422 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2080355350 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2084296439 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2087856991 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2094378557 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2096974363 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2125016105 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2127317088 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2127833074 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2132660956 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2133025770 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2133162217 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2141814006 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2142867204 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2148731342 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2151676139 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2154744699 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2157192858 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2167199561 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2288938668 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2413194177 @default.
• W2564467629 cites W2513471677 @default.
• W2564467629 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12072" @default.
• W2564467629 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5344194" @default.
• W2564467629 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28032913" @default.
• W2564467629 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2564467629 type Work @default.
• W2564467629 sameAs 2564467629 @default.
• W2564467629 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2564467629 countsByYear W25644676292017 @default.
• W2564467629 countsByYear W25644676292018 @default.
• W2564467629 countsByYear W25644676292019 @default.
• W2564467629 countsByYear W25644676292020 @default.
• W2564467629 countsByYear W25644676292022 @default.
• W2564467629 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2564467629 hasAuthorship W2564467629A5009406738 @default.
• W2564467629 hasAuthorship W2564467629A5013064030 @default.
• W2564467629 hasAuthorship W2564467629A5017592912 @default.
• W2564467629 hasAuthorship W2564467629A5037565667 @default.
• W2564467629 hasAuthorship W2564467629A5046139669 @default.
• W2564467629 hasAuthorship W2564467629A5075447974 @default.
• W2564467629 hasAuthorship W2564467629A5078748499 @default.
• W2564467629 hasBestOaLocation W25644676292 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConcept C104293457 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConcept C146957229 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConcept C2778405248 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConcept C2779358675 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConcept C2779983558 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConcept C39300077 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConcept C534529494 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConceptScore W2564467629C104293457 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConceptScore W2564467629C126322002 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConceptScore W2564467629C126838900 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConceptScore W2564467629C146957229 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConceptScore W2564467629C2778405248 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConceptScore W2564467629C2779358675 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConceptScore W2564467629C2779983558 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConceptScore W2564467629C2989005 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConceptScore W2564467629C39300077 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConceptScore W2564467629C42219234 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConceptScore W2564467629C534529494 @default.
• W2564467629 hasConceptScore W2564467629C71924100 @default.
• W2564467629 hasFunder F4320337338 @default.
• W2564467629 hasFunder F4320337363 @default.
• W2564467629 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2564467629 hasLocation W25644676291 @default.

• next