FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2565079912> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2565079912 abstract "At the beginning of the twentieth century, J.T. Merz reviewed the development of intellectual thought in Europe in the nineteenth century and argued that one of the changes that took place in the course of that century was the gradual universalization of scientific knowledge. 1 Ac­ cording to Merz, the decided national differences that one might have expected to find in Europe earlier, had been eradicated by improve­ ments in communication and transportation. Merz notwithstanding, for a number of years I have worked with the notion of national styles of science as a way of understanding, in part, how scientific innovations are received in different scientific cultures. The case I concentrated on was a comparison of the reception of Einstein's special theory of relativity in France, Germany, England and the United States in the years immediately following publication of the theory by Einstein in 1905. 2 In this paper I use the concept of national styles of science to examine how Einstein's special theory of relativity was introduced into the American scientific community, how the com­ munity initially responded to the theory and then how the theory has been assimilated since that time. One of the premises which underlies my analysis of the content of the theory of relativity is that the relationship between evidence and belief in science is precisely like the relationship between evidence and belief in other areas of human endeavor. If that is the case then national difference in science should be no more or no less pronounced than national differences in other spheres. Furthermore, if the social aspects of science, its organization and its relationship to other social institu­ tions are important to how a particular scientific theory is constructed and propagated, then differences in understanding in different countries should be related to differences in the social organization of science. I am, therefore, skeptical of Merz's claims Vis-iI-vis the disappearance of national styles. With regard to the theory of relativity, I am not suggesting that physicists in a given country acted together, lock-step," @default.
• W2565079912 created "2017-01-06" @default.
• W2565079912 creator A5011068940 @default.
• W2565079912 date "1987-01-01" @default.
• W2565079912 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2565079912 title "PUTTING NEW WINE IN OLD BOTTLES* The Assimilation of Relativity in America" @default.
• W2565079912 cites W1490163595 @default.
• W2565079912 cites W1630344695 @default.
• W2565079912 cites W1972159854 @default.
• W2565079912 cites W1986447743 @default.
• W2565079912 cites W2021919265 @default.
• W2565079912 cites W2036975839 @default.
• W2565079912 cites W2052402967 @default.
• W2565079912 cites W2052797266 @default.
• W2565079912 cites W2066756337 @default.
• W2565079912 cites W2068804001 @default.
• W2565079912 cites W2084518791 @default.
• W2565079912 cites W2094184408 @default.
• W2565079912 cites W2122470430 @default.
• W2565079912 cites W2197196029 @default.
• W2565079912 cites W2798276139 @default.
• W2565079912 cites W2798652388 @default.
• W2565079912 cites W2799648600 @default.
• W2565079912 cites W3003269640 @default.
• W2565079912 cites W1971992059 @default.
• W2565079912 hasPublicationYear "1987" @default.
• W2565079912 type Work @default.
• W2565079912 sameAs 2565079912 @default.
• W2565079912 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2565079912 countsByYear W25650799122012 @default.
• W2565079912 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2565079912 hasAuthorship W2565079912A5011068940 @default.
• W2565079912 hasConcept C105056347 @default.
• W2565079912 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2565079912 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2565079912 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2565079912 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2565079912 hasConcept C146846114 @default.
• W2565079912 hasConcept C149324446 @default.
• W2565079912 hasConcept C33332235 @default.
• W2565079912 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2565079912 hasConcept C37914503 @default.
• W2565079912 hasConceptScore W2565079912C105056347 @default.
• W2565079912 hasConceptScore W2565079912C111472728 @default.
• W2565079912 hasConceptScore W2565079912C121332964 @default.
• W2565079912 hasConceptScore W2565079912C138885662 @default.
• W2565079912 hasConceptScore W2565079912C144024400 @default.
• W2565079912 hasConceptScore W2565079912C146846114 @default.
• W2565079912 hasConceptScore W2565079912C149324446 @default.
• W2565079912 hasConceptScore W2565079912C33332235 @default.
• W2565079912 hasConceptScore W2565079912C33923547 @default.
• W2565079912 hasConceptScore W2565079912C37914503 @default.
• W2565079912 hasLocation W25650799121 @default.
• W2565079912 hasOpenAccess W2565079912 @default.
• W2565079912 hasPrimaryLocation W25650799121 @default.
• W2565079912 hasRelatedWork W1957089220 @default.
• W2565079912 hasRelatedWork W1964258977 @default.
• W2565079912 hasRelatedWork W2020742338 @default.
• W2565079912 hasRelatedWork W2045379871 @default.
• W2565079912 hasRelatedWork W2045952572 @default.
• W2565079912 hasRelatedWork W2064140856 @default.
• W2565079912 hasRelatedWork W2074602177 @default.
• W2565079912 hasRelatedWork W2075724167 @default.
• W2565079912 hasRelatedWork W2319411060 @default.
• W2565079912 hasRelatedWork W2323953836 @default.
• W2565079912 hasRelatedWork W2329819056 @default.
• W2565079912 hasRelatedWork W236003616 @default.
• W2565079912 hasRelatedWork W2483988124 @default.
• W2565079912 hasRelatedWork W2503804703 @default.
• W2565079912 hasRelatedWork W2794841080 @default.
• W2565079912 hasRelatedWork W2992540454 @default.
• W2565079912 hasRelatedWork W3121225177 @default.
• W2565079912 hasRelatedWork W3127772452 @default.
• W2565079912 hasRelatedWork W767174151 @default.
• W2565079912 hasRelatedWork W2184820322 @default.
• W2565079912 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2565079912 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2565079912 magId "2565079912" @default.
• W2565079912 workType "article" @default.