Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2565646323> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2565646323 endingPage "1414" @default.
- W2565646323 startingPage "1406" @default.
- W2565646323 abstract "Summary Although density‐dependent regulation of population growth is thought to be relatively widespread in nature, density‐independent models are often used to project the population response to drivers of change. Such models are often considered to provide a maximum estimate of mortality and therefore offer a precautionary approach to impact assessment. However, this perception assumes that density dependence operates as compensatory (negative density dependence), and overlooks that other forms of density dependence, such as depensation (positive density dependence), would generate a contrasting population response. Currently, there is debate about including density‐dependent mechanisms in models that assess the impact of offshore wind farms on marine bird populations. Density dependence is considered poorly understood for this group of species. Consequently, it is either excluded from assessments, or incorporated in a compensatory form that has little empirical validation. We reviewed the evidence for compensatory and depensatory regulation of 31 marine bird species, and conducted a meta‐analysis to examine the functional shape of density‐dependent population growth. The evidence was also evaluated in relation to established species‐specific indices of wind farm vulnerability in order to assess whether compensatory mechanisms are likely to offset losses associated with collision or displacement. Compensatory regulation was reported across all of the demographic processes and focal groups considered, and was attributed to a variety of causal mechanisms. The strength of compensatory population growth appeared consistent between colonies; however, the regulation of productivity was highly context‐dependent with a similar number of studies reporting compensatory, depensatory and insignificant effects. Depensation was consistently attributed to increased rates of predation at lower population densities. Synthesis and applications . We conclude that among marine bird species with high vulnerability to wind farms, compensatory regulation is unlikely to offset large and sustained losses from the breeding population. In addition, depensation has the potential to accelerate population declines and generate local or regional extinctions, especially in smaller colonial species. Consequently, density‐independent models will not offer a consistently precautionary approach for assessing the potential impact of wind farms on marine bird populations. Instead, assessments should examine the potential population response using a range of density‐dependent structures." @default.
- W2565646323 created "2017-01-06" @default.
- W2565646323 creator A5000379653 @default.
- W2565646323 creator A5021802314 @default.
- W2565646323 creator A5046396936 @default.
- W2565646323 date "2016-12-14" @default.
- W2565646323 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W2565646323 title "Density dependence and marine bird populations: are wind farm assessments precautionary?" @default.
- W2565646323 cites W1518897246 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W1552288368 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W1591131578 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W1969190761 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W1981249530 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W1992276103 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2005465578 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2013992859 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2014476229 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2023185725 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2032448434 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2035050558 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2043543644 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2043995081 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2056400506 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2061513338 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2072494101 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2072961879 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2079788230 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2092342001 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2093345505 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2094615350 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2097520543 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2101120048 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2105065325 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2107858042 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2110640436 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2127017843 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2134361301 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2136720830 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2142548765 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2146950447 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2146955965 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2149150763 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2152840624 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2154094733 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2158034479 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2162335786 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2166141328 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2314386342 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2321390672 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2326587170 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2328944507 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2333856010 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2334837978 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2345907988 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2463511942 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2486752527 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2506344596 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2516427343 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W2797008740 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W4243755660 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W4246866712 @default.
- W2565646323 cites W4386012887 @default.
- W2565646323 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12841" @default.
- W2565646323 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W2565646323 type Work @default.
- W2565646323 sameAs 2565646323 @default.
- W2565646323 citedByCount "20" @default.
- W2565646323 countsByYear W25656463232017 @default.
- W2565646323 countsByYear W25656463232018 @default.
- W2565646323 countsByYear W25656463232019 @default.
- W2565646323 countsByYear W25656463232020 @default.
- W2565646323 countsByYear W25656463232021 @default.
- W2565646323 countsByYear W25656463232022 @default.
- W2565646323 countsByYear W25656463232023 @default.
- W2565646323 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2565646323 hasAuthorship W2565646323A5000379653 @default.
- W2565646323 hasAuthorship W2565646323A5021802314 @default.
- W2565646323 hasAuthorship W2565646323A5046396936 @default.
- W2565646323 hasBestOaLocation W25656463231 @default.
- W2565646323 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
- W2565646323 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2565646323 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
- W2565646323 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
- W2565646323 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W2565646323 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2565646323 hasConcept C175605778 @default.
- W2565646323 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
- W2565646323 hasConcept C199733313 @default.
- W2565646323 hasConcept C2776121673 @default.
- W2565646323 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
- W2565646323 hasConcept C2780091579 @default.
- W2565646323 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
- W2565646323 hasConcept C47019633 @default.
- W2565646323 hasConcept C77352025 @default.
- W2565646323 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2565646323 hasConceptScore W2565646323C134018914 @default.
- W2565646323 hasConceptScore W2565646323C144024400 @default.
- W2565646323 hasConceptScore W2565646323C149782125 @default.