Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W256579726> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 61 of
61
with 100 items per page.
- W256579726 startingPage "79" @default.
- W256579726 abstract "I. INTRODUCTION In the summer of 2010, France's parliament banned the wearing of the Islamic full, head-and-body veil in places, colloquially known as the ban.1 The law prohibits person in areas from wearing an item of clothing for the purpose of concealing his or her face.2 A violation of this provision can lead to second-degree misdemeanor.3 The law also criminalizes forcing another person to conceal his or her face on the basis of gender with threats of violence, coercion, or by use of improper authority.4 A violation of this provision carries one year imprisonment and fine of C= 30,000 or, in case of force applied to minor, two year imprisonment and fine of C= 60,000.5 On October 7, 2010, the French Constitutional Council approved the law, finding that it allowed free exercise of religion in places of worship and that the punishment attached to the ban was not disproportionate.6 In the run-up to the law's passage, French President Nicolas Sarkozy justified the government's policy saying, [The burqa] is not religious symbol. It is symbol of servitude and humiliation.... We cannot accept, in our country, women imprisoned behind mesh, cut offfrom society, deprived of all identity... that is not the French republic's idea of women's dignity. 7 Sarkozy seems to be echoing the sentiments of the French populace, eighty-two percent of which approve of the ban.8 While other European countries have passed or are considering similar laws,9 no other European country has taken such definitive and harsh stance on Islamic veils. In the coming months, European countries will not only look to see whether France's law has positive effects, but whether it survives adjudication within the halls of the European Court of Human Rights (Court). This Note argues that, in its current form, France's legislation violates European law, specifically Article IX of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the Court's interpretation thereof. Moreover, because of the likelihood that the Court will strike down France's law as violative, this Note argues that France should revise the burqa ban in accordance with the Court's jurisprudence. In Part II, this Note will explain the use of the burqa as religious symbol in Islam and illustrate the underpinnings of its use as an expression of individual belief, despite the growing perception in the western world that its use is degrading to women. In addition, this Note offers historical account of the place of Muslims in French society. Part II also provides an explanation of the role of secularism in France and the principle of laicite that governs French decision-making, particularly its role in the current burqa ban. Part II concludes with an analysis of the Court's case law interpreting Article IX, framing the discussion around the use of personal, religious symbols. In Part III, this Note offers an analysis of France's law under the Court's jurisprudence. Specifically, Part III addresses the separate considerations that the Court would make in challenge to the burqa ban and demonstrates why the law would fail the Court's Article IX three-part test. Part III concludes with recommendations for ways that France may redraftthe law to make it more consistent with the Court's decisions and still accomplish its greater interests. II. BACKGROUND A. Use of the Burqa in Islam The burqa (or, alternatively, burka) is a loose enveloping garment that covers the face and body and is worn in public by Muslim women.10 The widely recognized source for Islam's rationale behind female body coverings can be found in two places within the Qur'an. The first reads O Prophet! tell thy wives and daughters and the believing women, that they should cast their outer garments over their persons (when abroad): that is most convenient, that they should be known (as such) and not molested.11 The second text reads [a]nd say to the believing women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty; that they should not display their beauty and ornaments except what (must ordinarily) appear thereof; that they should draw their veils over their bosoms. …" @default.
- W256579726 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W256579726 creator A5011499977 @default.
- W256579726 date "2012-01-01" @default.
- W256579726 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W256579726 title "Public Exposure: Of Burqas, Secularism, and France's Violation of European Law" @default.
- W256579726 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
- W256579726 type Work @default.
- W256579726 sameAs 256579726 @default.
- W256579726 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W256579726 countsByYear W2565797262015 @default.
- W256579726 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W256579726 hasAuthorship W256579726A5011499977 @default.
- W256579726 hasConcept C11293438 @default.
- W256579726 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W256579726 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W256579726 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W256579726 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
- W256579726 hasConcept C2778490220 @default.
- W256579726 hasConcept C2778770431 @default.
- W256579726 hasConcept C2781440851 @default.
- W256579726 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W256579726 hasConceptScore W256579726C11293438 @default.
- W256579726 hasConceptScore W256579726C144024400 @default.
- W256579726 hasConceptScore W256579726C17744445 @default.
- W256579726 hasConceptScore W256579726C199539241 @default.
- W256579726 hasConceptScore W256579726C2776949292 @default.
- W256579726 hasConceptScore W256579726C2778490220 @default.
- W256579726 hasConceptScore W256579726C2778770431 @default.
- W256579726 hasConceptScore W256579726C2781440851 @default.
- W256579726 hasConceptScore W256579726C94625758 @default.
- W256579726 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W256579726 hasLocation W2565797261 @default.
- W256579726 hasOpenAccess W256579726 @default.
- W256579726 hasPrimaryLocation W2565797261 @default.
- W256579726 hasRelatedWork W1492849369 @default.
- W256579726 hasRelatedWork W1517502625 @default.
- W256579726 hasRelatedWork W15217638 @default.
- W256579726 hasRelatedWork W172650889 @default.
- W256579726 hasRelatedWork W2079493337 @default.
- W256579726 hasRelatedWork W223080237 @default.
- W256579726 hasRelatedWork W2265065560 @default.
- W256579726 hasRelatedWork W2268622112 @default.
- W256579726 hasRelatedWork W285989453 @default.
- W256579726 hasRelatedWork W2903156024 @default.
- W256579726 hasRelatedWork W2921757436 @default.
- W256579726 hasRelatedWork W2961297596 @default.
- W256579726 hasRelatedWork W3043163772 @default.
- W256579726 hasRelatedWork W3122590497 @default.
- W256579726 hasRelatedWork W3123387028 @default.
- W256579726 hasRelatedWork W3123668021 @default.
- W256579726 hasRelatedWork W3124645162 @default.
- W256579726 hasRelatedWork W3124936989 @default.
- W256579726 hasRelatedWork W3164322374 @default.
- W256579726 hasRelatedWork W2610931235 @default.
- W256579726 hasVolume "44" @default.
- W256579726 isParatext "false" @default.
- W256579726 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W256579726 magId "256579726" @default.
- W256579726 workType "article" @default.