FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2566852022> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2566852022 abstract "A field experiment was carried out at El- Ismailia Agriculture Research Station Farm in Ismailia Governorate, Egypt. The institute farm is located at 30° 35´41.9 N Latitude and 32° 16´ 45.8 E longitude during two successive winter seasons cultivated with Green Pea (Pisum sativum L.) crop grown on sandy soil under drip irrigation system to evaluate the possible use of rock phosphate in agriculture through partially acidulation with different concentration (the organic and mineral acids were added with three concentrations i.e. 5 ,10 and 20 % ) (C1, C2 and C3). Acidulation with organic acids (humic, fulvic and citric) as compared to mineral acids ( sulfuric), sulfur and compost extract on phosphorus release from rock phosphate(15 % P2O5) as compared to super phosphate(15 % P2O5) and their reflection on soil chemical properties and yield production of Green Pea. Results show that acidulation both of rock phosphate and super phosphate caused a significant decrease in soil pH as compared to control treatments (superphosphate only without acidulation) or rock phosphate only , also acidulated rock phosphate was superior for decreasing the soil pH as compared to superphosphate . Moreover, pH values decreased significantly along with increasing the concentration of acids, while all applied treatments increased the soil EC and nutrient availability ( N, P and K) as compared to control treatment. This trend was more pronouns for rock phosphate as compared to superphosphate. With respect to the different acidulates, for both super and rock phosphate the sulfuric and fulvic acid were superior for securing a maximum availability of nutrient (N, P and K) as compared to the control and other treatments .The treatments arranged as follow ; sulfuric acid, fulvic acid, humic substance , sulfur ,citric acid and compost extract. Data also indicated that yield components (straw, pods and biological yield) of green pea crop increased significantly due to application of different acidulated treatments for superphosphate and rock phosphate as compared to control treatment at both tested season. Generally, acidulated rock phosphate was superior as compared to super phosphate in dry matter yield. Acidulation both of rock phosphate and super phosphate with sulfuric and fulvic acid was the superior for increasing the nutrient uptake and yield components. Also, phosphorus uptake increased with each increase in concentration of acids, also both yield and P- uptake for rock phosphate were higher when the pH decreased. Generally, Positive relationship was responded between the availability of nutrients in the soil and the uptake of nutrients with acidulation. Also, acidulation of both super phosphate and rock phosphate enhance the Phosphorus use efficiency of Pea yield especially for rock phosphate. Generally increasing the concentration of acids cause a significant increase in phosphorus use efficiency, the highest phosphorus use efficiency was obtained in presence of sulfuric and fulvic acid for both P- sources super phosphate and rock phosphate as compared to the other treatments, the opposite trend was obtained in presence of citric acid and compost extract. Finally, we can concluded that uses of acidulated rock phosphate became a pronounce alternative phosphate fertilizers because of its effect on increasing the availability of P, nutritional status and yield of green pea on certain Egyptian soil." @default.
• W2566852022 created "2017-01-06" @default.
• W2566852022 creator A5063521644 @default.
• W2566852022 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W2566852022 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2566852022 title "Studies on the Possible use of Rock phosphate in Agriculture" @default.
• W2566852022 cites W1033783139 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W1161996196 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W1553260008 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W1979691540 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W1995919094 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W2009052870 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W2020661042 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W202528172 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W2046339615 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W2049802953 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W2050497857 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W2050910675 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W2089069909 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W2094635987 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W2110836411 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W2120950930 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W2128080907 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W2132489881 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W2159888681 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W2181418345 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W2185429759 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W2413188489 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W2797525065 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W2986695161 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W2993432082 @default.
• W2566852022 cites W2153202064 @default.
• W2566852022 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2566852022 type Work @default.
• W2566852022 sameAs 2566852022 @default.
• W2566852022 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2566852022 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2566852022 hasAuthorship W2566852022A5063521644 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConcept C107872376 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConcept C142796444 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConcept C2775997218 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConcept C2777132085 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConcept C2780560099 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConcept C30163351 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConcept C510538283 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConcept C6557445 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConceptScore W2566852022C107872376 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConceptScore W2566852022C142796444 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConceptScore W2566852022C178790620 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConceptScore W2566852022C185592680 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConceptScore W2566852022C2775997218 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConceptScore W2566852022C2777132085 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConceptScore W2566852022C2780560099 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConceptScore W2566852022C30163351 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConceptScore W2566852022C39432304 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConceptScore W2566852022C510538283 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConceptScore W2566852022C6557445 @default.
• W2566852022 hasConceptScore W2566852022C86803240 @default.
• W2566852022 hasLocation W25668520221 @default.
• W2566852022 hasOpenAccess W2566852022 @default.
• W2566852022 hasPrimaryLocation W25668520221 @default.
• W2566852022 hasRelatedWork W1570786664 @default.
• W2566852022 hasRelatedWork W1605272612 @default.
• W2566852022 hasRelatedWork W1605510726 @default.
• W2566852022 hasRelatedWork W1996799184 @default.
• W2566852022 hasRelatedWork W2001999197 @default.
• W2566852022 hasRelatedWork W2020295629 @default.
• W2566852022 hasRelatedWork W2024037972 @default.
• W2566852022 hasRelatedWork W2060942412 @default.
• W2566852022 hasRelatedWork W2073764504 @default.
• W2566852022 hasRelatedWork W2083685457 @default.
• W2566852022 hasRelatedWork W2185278906 @default.
• W2566852022 hasRelatedWork W2353812218 @default.
• W2566852022 hasRelatedWork W2354439900 @default.
• W2566852022 hasRelatedWork W2596751819 @default.
• W2566852022 hasRelatedWork W2885261552 @default.
• W2566852022 hasRelatedWork W3015983632 @default.
• W2566852022 hasRelatedWork W3095418305 @default.
• W2566852022 hasRelatedWork W3157283696 @default.
• W2566852022 hasRelatedWork W3164736898 @default.
• W2566852022 hasRelatedWork W372927716 @default.
• W2566852022 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2566852022 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2566852022 magId "2566852022" @default.
• W2566852022 workType "article" @default.