FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W25674421> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W25674421 endingPage "399" @default.
• W25674421 startingPage "394" @default.
• W25674421 abstract "The aim was to evaluate the diagnostic value of plain X-ray images in the diagnosis of pelvic ring injury in comparison with CT findings.The group evaluated consisted of 30 patients, 11 women and 19 men, at an average age of 46 years (range, 20-81 years; women, 20-68 years, men, 20-81 years; average age, 49 and 44 years in women and men, respectively) in whom plain radiography and CT scans were done as part of the initial examination. A retrospective assessment of plain X-ray images was carried out by two independent specialists (radiologist and trauma surgeon). The authors together evaluated CT scans and carried out the final assessment of all medical records. Pelvic radiography was taken with a mobile X-ray unit; CT scans were done according to the standard trauma scanning protocol, using a CT scanner with either one row (CT) or 16 rows (multidetector/MDCT) of detectors.Based on the evaluation of X-ray and CT findings, a total of 133 fractures or displacements in the sacroiliac joint or pubic symphysis were detected. The radiologist identified 99 (74 %) injured structures and the trauma surgeon 111 (83 %) ones. This difference was not significant on the whole (p = 0.536), nor when individual structures were assessed. False negative findings were made by the radiologist on 10 occasions and by the trauma surgeon on seven occasions; the evaluation of image data sets by both observers was associated with only one false positive finding. The overall sensitivity of plain X-ray images, when compared to CT scans, was 83 %, but it was considerably lower on evaluation by one observer only (radiologist, 67 %; trauma surgeon, 78 %).The biggest difference between the findings of two independent specialists existed in the assessment of injuries to the posterior ring of the pelvis (SI joint, sacrum) on plain X-ray images. However, trauma in this region was identified without any doubt on CT scans. To diagnose the type of pelvic injury from CT scans without a possibility to evaluate standard anteroposterior (AP) radiographs or good-quality 2D or 3D reconstructions was found difficult in over one third of the patients. A validity comparison of standard AP radiography and high-quality 2D or 3D CT reconstructions showed that both had an equal value for the exact detection of pelvic injury type. For correct evaluation of the type of injury, scans from the MDCT were easier to read than those from the CT scanner.There is no doubt about the role of standard AP X-ray in the identification of pelvic injury type in polytraumatized, hemodynamically unstable patients. The validity of CT examination for identification of injury to the posterior ring of the pelvis in particular is so high that, in the primary diagnostic procedure, inlet and outlet radiography of the pelvis has lost its importance. The information on the stability and type of injury provided by 2D and 3D CT reconstructions is so exact that, at present, CT examination can reliably replace AP radiography, particularly if, for various reasons, good-quality X-ray images cannot be guaranteed." @default.
• W25674421 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W25674421 creator A5022949502 @default.
• W25674421 creator A5023648765 @default.
• W25674421 creator A5024731118 @default.
• W25674421 creator A5028462958 @default.
• W25674421 creator A5029759496 @default.
• W25674421 creator A5066796184 @default.
• W25674421 date "2006-12-01" @default.
• W25674421 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W25674421 title "The Role of Plain Radiography in Pelvic Trauma in the Era of Advanced Computed Tomography" @default.
• W25674421 cites W150778083 @default.
• W25674421 cites W1978043290 @default.
• W25674421 cites W1984580621 @default.
• W25674421 cites W1992574849 @default.
• W25674421 cites W2007188606 @default.
• W25674421 cites W2013390300 @default.
• W25674421 cites W2023857991 @default.
• W25674421 cites W202525034 @default.
• W25674421 cites W2037110729 @default.
• W25674421 cites W2049105353 @default.
• W25674421 cites W2058641639 @default.
• W25674421 cites W2061036496 @default.
• W25674421 cites W2066947739 @default.
• W25674421 cites W2083140515 @default.
• W25674421 cites W2093032478 @default.
• W25674421 cites W2129381221 @default.
• W25674421 cites W2396920896 @default.
• W25674421 cites W2407638882 @default.
• W25674421 cites W2422628658 @default.
• W25674421 cites W2985300021 @default.
• W25674421 cites W4235807355 @default.
• W25674421 cites W4236940298 @default.
• W25674421 cites W4250799331 @default.
• W25674421 cites W26997847 @default.
• W25674421 doi "https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2006/060" @default.
• W25674421 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17266841" @default.
• W25674421 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W25674421 type Work @default.
• W25674421 sameAs 25674421 @default.
• W25674421 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W25674421 countsByYear W256744212013 @default.
• W25674421 countsByYear W256744212020 @default.
• W25674421 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W25674421 hasAuthorship W25674421A5022949502 @default.
• W25674421 hasAuthorship W25674421A5023648765 @default.
• W25674421 hasAuthorship W25674421A5024731118 @default.
• W25674421 hasAuthorship W25674421A5028462958 @default.
• W25674421 hasAuthorship W25674421A5029759496 @default.
• W25674421 hasAuthorship W25674421A5066796184 @default.
• W25674421 hasBestOaLocation W256744211 @default.
• W25674421 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W25674421 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W25674421 hasConcept C163716698 @default.
• W25674421 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W25674421 hasConcept C2777545690 @default.
• W25674421 hasConcept C2778357063 @default.
• W25674421 hasConcept C2778614933 @default.
• W25674421 hasConcept C2778688959 @default.
• W25674421 hasConcept C2780110798 @default.
• W25674421 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W25674421 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W25674421 hasConcept C544519230 @default.
• W25674421 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W25674421 hasConceptScore W25674421C126838900 @default.
• W25674421 hasConceptScore W25674421C141071460 @default.
• W25674421 hasConceptScore W25674421C163716698 @default.
• W25674421 hasConceptScore W25674421C167135981 @default.
• W25674421 hasConceptScore W25674421C2777545690 @default.
• W25674421 hasConceptScore W25674421C2778357063 @default.
• W25674421 hasConceptScore W25674421C2778614933 @default.
• W25674421 hasConceptScore W25674421C2778688959 @default.
• W25674421 hasConceptScore W25674421C2780110798 @default.
• W25674421 hasConceptScore W25674421C2989005 @default.
• W25674421 hasConceptScore W25674421C36454342 @default.
• W25674421 hasConceptScore W25674421C544519230 @default.
• W25674421 hasConceptScore W25674421C71924100 @default.
• W25674421 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W25674421 hasLocation W256744211 @default.
• W25674421 hasLocation W256744212 @default.
• W25674421 hasOpenAccess W25674421 @default.
• W25674421 hasPrimaryLocation W256744211 @default.
• W25674421 hasRelatedWork W1965840450 @default.
• W25674421 hasRelatedWork W2058724315 @default.
• W25674421 hasRelatedWork W2069534271 @default.
• W25674421 hasRelatedWork W2079359048 @default.
• W25674421 hasRelatedWork W2330776895 @default.
• W25674421 hasRelatedWork W2375516248 @default.
• W25674421 hasRelatedWork W2550258637 @default.
• W25674421 hasRelatedWork W3143818984 @default.
• W25674421 hasRelatedWork W4302369213 @default.
• W25674421 hasRelatedWork W4311115269 @default.
• W25674421 hasVolume "73" @default.
• W25674421 isParatext "false" @default.
• W25674421 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W25674421 magId "25674421" @default.
• W25674421 workType "article" @default.