FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2567701199> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2567701199 startingPage "77" @default.
• W2567701199 abstract "INTRODUCTIONA journal ranking list should be internally developed by faculty and administration accreditation and/or tenure and promotion purposes. purpose of developing this list is to determine what are important to support the school's/department's mission and to identify faculty where they should publish tenure and promotion decisions. internal journal ranking list should be developed based on the mission of the school. External lists, i.e., national or international rankings, are often not appropriate many schools because they are not tailored to the school's mission. For example, external lists would generally not be appropriate small schools and/or schools with only undergraduate programs and/or small master's programs without any doctoral programs. While external lists tend to be more appropriate top ranked, large schools with Ph.D. programs or graduate programs with a heavy emphasis on research, the authors believe that they do not reflect the mission of many business schools. purpose of this article is to offer an objective method that could be used to internally develop a journal ranking list based on a school's mission and to present an example utilizing accounting journals.AACSB STANDARDSAccording to Standard 2 of AACSB's Eligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards Business Accreditation, a school must produce contributions that are consistent with its mission, expected outcomes, and and that impact the theory, practice, and teaching of business and management [2013, p. 16]. key point is that the contributions must be consistent with a school's mission and therefore one size (externally generated lists) does not fit all. Unfortunately, some schools push research expectations that do not relate to their mission because the reputation of an academic institution is strongly correlated with the reputation of its scholarly output [Azar and Brock, 2008]. For example, in top journals are used by Bloomberg Businessweek and Financial Times when ranking business schools [Bonner, Ffesford, Van der Stede, and Young, 2006]. Business-week includes intellectual capital in its analysis when ranking schools, which is based, in part, on the number of faculty in top journals [Lavelle, 2010].AACSB standards also require that a school's resources support its mission and related standards. According to AACSB's Standard 3 [p. 20], a school must have to provide resources appropriate to, and sufficient for, achieving its mission and action items. Standard 3 further mandates that: The school has adequate financial resources to support high-quality faculty contributions and their impact in accordance with its mission, expected outcomes, and strategies [p. 20].Attaway et al. [2008] analyzed AACSB peer reviews of various accounting programs and found that some of these programs used published rankings to develop a list of preferred publications their accounting faculty. Attaway et al. [2008] reports that a consequence of using published rankings (i.e., external rankings) results in pushing top journals when the schools do not have the resources to support this type of research. Furthermore, for programs where research is either not the top priority or is not adequately funded, publication lists would not appear in line with the AACSB's mission-based approach [Attaway et al., 2008, p. 72]. criteria used to develop the internal journal list should be appropriate to the school's mission and financial resources. If a school without adequate research funding desires to motivate faculty to publish in top tier journals that appear in external lists, then it could develop a separate list, referred to as an aspirational journal list or star list and provide research rewards to faculty who publish in such journals.LITERATURE REVIEWThe ranking of journals can have significant effects on the tenure and promotion of candidates, as well as the morale of faculty [Attaway et al. …" @default.
• W2567701199 created "2017-01-06" @default.
• W2567701199 creator A5003000988 @default.
• W2567701199 creator A5008611191 @default.
• W2567701199 date "2014-10-01" @default.
• W2567701199 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2567701199 title "Method of Ranking Journals Employing Mission Based Criteria Utilizing Accounting Journals as an Example" @default.
• W2567701199 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2567701199 type Work @default.
• W2567701199 sameAs 2567701199 @default.
• W2567701199 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2567701199 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2567701199 hasAuthorship W2567701199A5003000988 @default.
• W2567701199 hasAuthorship W2567701199A5008611191 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConcept C189430467 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConcept C41458344 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConcept C61521584 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConcept C98147612 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConceptScore W2567701199C119857082 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConceptScore W2567701199C121955636 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConceptScore W2567701199C144133560 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConceptScore W2567701199C17744445 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConceptScore W2567701199C189430467 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConceptScore W2567701199C199539241 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConceptScore W2567701199C39549134 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConceptScore W2567701199C41008148 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConceptScore W2567701199C41458344 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConceptScore W2567701199C61521584 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConceptScore W2567701199C94625758 @default.
• W2567701199 hasConceptScore W2567701199C98147612 @default.
• W2567701199 hasLocation W25677011991 @default.
• W2567701199 hasOpenAccess W2567701199 @default.
• W2567701199 hasPrimaryLocation W25677011991 @default.
• W2567701199 hasRelatedWork W115450732 @default.
• W2567701199 hasRelatedWork W1504460787 @default.
• W2567701199 hasRelatedWork W1532042092 @default.
• W2567701199 hasRelatedWork W1601562521 @default.
• W2567701199 hasRelatedWork W1642210861 @default.
• W2567701199 hasRelatedWork W180272267 @default.
• W2567701199 hasRelatedWork W1896345104 @default.
• W2567701199 hasRelatedWork W2042072687 @default.
• W2567701199 hasRelatedWork W2044034952 @default.
• W2567701199 hasRelatedWork W2078869409 @default.
• W2567701199 hasRelatedWork W2103523376 @default.
• W2567701199 hasRelatedWork W2121834325 @default.
• W2567701199 hasRelatedWork W2144204289 @default.
• W2567701199 hasRelatedWork W2285030136 @default.
• W2567701199 hasRelatedWork W2765417870 @default.
• W2567701199 hasRelatedWork W2767102025 @default.
• W2567701199 hasRelatedWork W2973196466 @default.
• W2567701199 hasRelatedWork W2991859518 @default.
• W2567701199 hasRelatedWork W301112827 @default.
• W2567701199 hasRelatedWork W326504655 @default.
• W2567701199 hasVolume "15" @default.
• W2567701199 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2567701199 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2567701199 magId "2567701199" @default.
• W2567701199 workType "article" @default.