FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2568217792> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2568217792 abstract "During the content validation phase of the development of a hybrid heuristic/survey-based usability assessment technique, the authors of this paper conducted a card sort with Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) in Human Factors Psychology. The information provided would inform the initial usability dimensions (e.g., Help, Learnability, Graphic Design & Aesthetics) used in the resulting technique. While Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA) is the standard approach to data analysis with card sorts, several factors (e.g., size of data set, application of system, nature of construct measured) led the research team to consider alternatives. As a result, data derived from this card sort were analyzed in two ways: 1) using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and, 2) Using (HCA). The use of the two methods provided an opportunity for researchers to compare their quality and utility in informing dimensions used during the construct validation phase. While HCA was more detailed and provided a better visual description as to how individual items were related to others and broad dimensions, the results were far from parsimonious, making it difficult to determine the meaning of broad dimensions and exactly where those dimensions deviated from others. In contrast, CFA resulted in clear and distinct dimensions with individual items loading on no more than two dimensions (e.g., one primary and one secondary). With that said, the CFA resulted in the rejection of more items as many did not load on the extant dimensions. The general conclusions of this psychometric methodological comparison, for the validation of a Usability evaluation method, is that while HCA is an excellent method for understanding the intercorrelations and intricacies of a construct (i.e., Usability), it may not be the best suited approach for developing a usability method intended to provide systematic feedback to system developers. If the goal is the development of a usability assessment technique, researchers and practitioners alike can use CFA to analyze their card sort data and inform the construct validation phase of their measure." @default.
• W2568217792 created "2017-01-13" @default.
• W2568217792 creator A5024090240 @default.
• W2568217792 creator A5072077730 @default.
• W2568217792 date "2015-09-01" @default.
• W2568217792 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2568217792 title "Content Validation from Card Sorting" @default.
• W2568217792 cites W1507438245 @default.
• W2568217792 cites W1968797033 @default.
• W2568217792 cites W1981393348 @default.
• W2568217792 cites W2032191478 @default.
• W2568217792 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931215591302" @default.
• W2568217792 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2568217792 type Work @default.
• W2568217792 sameAs 2568217792 @default.
• W2568217792 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2568217792 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2568217792 hasAuthorship W2568217792A5024090240 @default.
• W2568217792 hasAuthorship W2568217792A5072077730 @default.
• W2568217792 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2568217792 hasConcept C124101348 @default.
• W2568217792 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2568217792 hasConcept C164866538 @default.
• W2568217792 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2568217792 hasConcept C2781039887 @default.
• W2568217792 hasConcept C40722632 @default.
• W2568217792 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2568217792 hasConcept C71104824 @default.
• W2568217792 hasConcept C73555534 @default.
• W2568217792 hasConcept C92835128 @default.
• W2568217792 hasConceptScore W2568217792C119857082 @default.
• W2568217792 hasConceptScore W2568217792C124101348 @default.
• W2568217792 hasConceptScore W2568217792C154945302 @default.
• W2568217792 hasConceptScore W2568217792C164866538 @default.
• W2568217792 hasConceptScore W2568217792C199360897 @default.
• W2568217792 hasConceptScore W2568217792C2781039887 @default.
• W2568217792 hasConceptScore W2568217792C40722632 @default.
• W2568217792 hasConceptScore W2568217792C41008148 @default.
• W2568217792 hasConceptScore W2568217792C71104824 @default.
• W2568217792 hasConceptScore W2568217792C73555534 @default.
• W2568217792 hasConceptScore W2568217792C92835128 @default.
• W2568217792 hasLocation W25682177921 @default.
• W2568217792 hasOpenAccess W2568217792 @default.
• W2568217792 hasPrimaryLocation W25682177921 @default.
• W2568217792 hasRelatedWork W145630097 @default.
• W2568217792 hasRelatedWork W1546481965 @default.
• W2568217792 hasRelatedWork W163588987 @default.
• W2568217792 hasRelatedWork W187811203 @default.
• W2568217792 hasRelatedWork W1992021090 @default.
• W2568217792 hasRelatedWork W2048260733 @default.
• W2568217792 hasRelatedWork W2085921826 @default.
• W2568217792 hasRelatedWork W2386752725 @default.
• W2568217792 hasRelatedWork W2400143790 @default.
• W2568217792 hasRelatedWork W2482152616 @default.
• W2568217792 hasRelatedWork W2556643232 @default.
• W2568217792 hasRelatedWork W2612486738 @default.
• W2568217792 hasRelatedWork W2913386691 @default.
• W2568217792 hasRelatedWork W2914415971 @default.
• W2568217792 hasRelatedWork W2998207800 @default.
• W2568217792 hasRelatedWork W3003315701 @default.
• W2568217792 hasRelatedWork W3006108414 @default.
• W2568217792 hasRelatedWork W3009263636 @default.
• W2568217792 hasRelatedWork W3089308078 @default.
• W2568217792 hasRelatedWork W3184678566 @default.
• W2568217792 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2568217792 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2568217792 magId "2568217792" @default.
• W2568217792 workType "article" @default.