Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2568597738> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 83 of
83
with 100 items per page.
- W2568597738 endingPage "87" @default.
- W2568597738 startingPage "39" @default.
- W2568597738 abstract "Abstract While freedom of expression has a long and well-established constitutional foundation as a self-governing concept, the right to privacy is a relatively recent norm in the constitutional orientation of the United Kingdom. Until the Human Rights Act 1998, the right to privacy had little standing constitutionally. Following on from this standard-setting, notably, both rights have taken on added importance in our modern technological society. Nevertheless, the formulation of privacy into a legal doctrine of human rights seems to have presented a fundamental tension in relation to freedom of expression. As a matter of legal logic, the courts, through a consideration of the law, examine the substantive legal issues in terms of a balancing process, whereby the interest in privacy is balanced against the interest in freedom of expression. It is a matter of broad principle for the courts to rely on injunctions as ancillary instruments of equity in doing justice in this field. Significantly, while the elementary norm of an injunction is that it commands an act that the court regards as an essential constituent to justice, unfortunately, many contend that judges have gone beyond this point, and this is shifting opinions. In fact, serious concerns have been frequently expressed about the extent to which the rich are easily able to invoke the discretion of the court to grant injunctions in a fashion that remains an antithesis to the principle of open justice and also undermines the exercise of freedom of speech. While this suspicion is not entirely new to matters of procedural law, the recent case, PJS v News Group Newspapers turned on this controversy. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to examine the complexity of celebrity privacy injunctions in the age of the internet and question its relevance, as we outline the extent to which social media is challenging the authority of the state (judiciary) in this direction." @default.
- W2568597738 created "2017-01-13" @default.
- W2568597738 creator A5004779114 @default.
- W2568597738 creator A5016577458 @default.
- W2568597738 date "2016-12-01" @default.
- W2568597738 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2568597738 title "Is Social Media Challenging the Authority of the Judiciary? Rethinking the Effectiveness of Anonymised and Super Injunctions in the Age of the Internet" @default.
- W2568597738 cites W1495255565 @default.
- W2568597738 cites W1598299122 @default.
- W2568597738 cites W2616332126 @default.
- W2568597738 cites W2796921228 @default.
- W2568597738 cites W3111543044 @default.
- W2568597738 cites W3125943503 @default.
- W2568597738 cites W382282354 @default.
- W2568597738 cites W40741241 @default.
- W2568597738 cites W4211146243 @default.
- W2568597738 cites W4233201786 @default.
- W2568597738 cites W4241144816 @default.
- W2568597738 cites W4249522792 @default.
- W2568597738 cites W4253688496 @default.
- W2568597738 cites W4300519180 @default.
- W2568597738 cites W4302358556 @default.
- W2568597738 cites W4382865609 @default.
- W2568597738 doi "https://doi.org/10.1515/jles-2016-0017" @default.
- W2568597738 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W2568597738 type Work @default.
- W2568597738 sameAs 2568597738 @default.
- W2568597738 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W2568597738 countsByYear W25685977382018 @default.
- W2568597738 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2568597738 hasAuthorship W2568597738A5004779114 @default.
- W2568597738 hasAuthorship W2568597738A5016577458 @default.
- W2568597738 hasBestOaLocation W25685977381 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConcept C191795146 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConcept C2777632292 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConcept C2777935057 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConcept C2778645526 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConcept C95691615 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConceptScore W2568597738C138885662 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConceptScore W2568597738C144024400 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConceptScore W2568597738C169437150 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConceptScore W2568597738C17744445 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConceptScore W2568597738C190253527 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConceptScore W2568597738C191795146 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConceptScore W2568597738C199539241 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConceptScore W2568597738C2776154427 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConceptScore W2568597738C2776211767 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConceptScore W2568597738C2777632292 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConceptScore W2568597738C2777935057 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConceptScore W2568597738C2778645526 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConceptScore W2568597738C41895202 @default.
- W2568597738 hasConceptScore W2568597738C95691615 @default.
- W2568597738 hasIssue "32" @default.
- W2568597738 hasLocation W25685977381 @default.
- W2568597738 hasLocation W25685977382 @default.
- W2568597738 hasOpenAccess W2568597738 @default.
- W2568597738 hasPrimaryLocation W25685977381 @default.
- W2568597738 hasRelatedWork W2040883266 @default.
- W2568597738 hasRelatedWork W2072916617 @default.
- W2568597738 hasRelatedWork W2245483302 @default.
- W2568597738 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2568597738 hasRelatedWork W2967592635 @default.
- W2568597738 hasRelatedWork W3161483186 @default.
- W2568597738 hasRelatedWork W3198899389 @default.
- W2568597738 hasRelatedWork W4234683370 @default.
- W2568597738 hasRelatedWork W4367394432 @default.
- W2568597738 hasRelatedWork W4383104595 @default.
- W2568597738 hasVolume "18" @default.
- W2568597738 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2568597738 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2568597738 magId "2568597738" @default.
- W2568597738 workType "article" @default.