FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2569073079> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2569073079 endingPage "646" @default.
• W2569073079 startingPage "646" @default.
• W2569073079 abstract "Objective The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of hospital-based eHealth technologies on quality, safety and efficiency of care and clinical outcomes. Methods Systematic reviews and reviews of systematic reviews of eHealth technologies published in PubMed/Medline/Cochrane Library between January 2010 and October 2015 were evaluated. Reviews of implementation issues, non-hospital settings or remote care or patient-focused technologies were excluded from analysis. Methodological quality was assessed using a validated appraisal tool. Outcome measures were benefits and harms relating to electronic medical records (EMRs), computerised physician order entry (CPOE), electronic prescribing (ePrescribing) and computerised decision support systems (CDSS). Results are presented as a narrative overview given marked study heterogeneity. Results Nineteen systematic reviews and two reviews of systematic reviews were included from 1197 abstracts, nine rated as high quality. For EMR functions, there was moderate-quality evidence of reduced hospitalisations and length of stay and low-quality evidence of improved organisational efficiency, greater accuracy of information and reduced documentation and process turnaround times. For CPOE functions, there was moderate-quality evidence of reductions in turnaround times and resource utilisation. For ePrescribing, there was moderate-quality evidence of substantially fewer medications errors and adverse drug events, greater guideline adherence, improved disease control and decreased dispensing turnaround times. For CDSS, there was moderate-quality evidence of increased use of preventive care and drug interaction reminders and alerts, increased use of diagnostic aids, more appropriate test ordering with fewer tests per patient, greater guideline adherence, improved processes of care and less disease morbidity. There was conflicting evidence regarding effects on in-patient mortality and overall costs. Reported harms were alert fatigue, increased technology interaction time, creation of disruptive workarounds and new prescribing errors. Conclusion eHealth technologies in hospital settings appear to improve efficiency and appropriateness of care, prescribing safety and disease control. Effects on mortality, readmissions, total costs and patient and provider experience remain uncertain. What is known about the topic? Healthcare systems internationally are undertaking large-scale digitisation programs with hospitals being a major focus. Although predictive analyses suggest that eHealth technologies have the potential to markedly transform health care delivery, contemporary peer-reviewed research evidence detailing their benefits and harms is limited. What does this paper add? This narrative overview of 19 systematic reviews and two reviews of systematic reviews published over the past 5 years provides a summary of cumulative evidence of clinical and organisational effects of contemporary eHealth technologies in hospital practice. EMRs have the potential to increase accuracy and completeness of clinical information, reduce documentation time and enhance information transfer and organisational efficiency. CPOE appears to improve laboratory turnaround times and decrease resource utilisation. ePrescribing significantly reduces medication errors and adverse drug events. CDSS, especially those used at the point of care and integrated into workflows, attract the strongest evidence for substantially increasing clinician adherence to guidelines, appropriateness of disease and treatment monitoring and optimal medication use. Evidence of effects of eHealth technologies on discrete clinical outcomes, such as morbid events, mortality and readmissions, is currently limited and conflicting. What are the implications for practitioners? eHealth technologies confer benefits in improving quality and safety of care with little evidence of major hazards. Whether EMRs and CPOE can affect clinical outcomes or overall costs in the absence of auxiliary support systems, such as ePrescribing and CDSS, remains unclear. eHealth technologies are evolving rapidly and the evidence base used to inform clinician and managerial decisions to invest in these technologies must be updated continually. More rigorous field research using appropriate evaluation methods is needed to better define real-world benefits and harms. Customisation of eHealth applications to the context of patient-centred care and management of highly complex patients with multimorbidity will be an ongoing challenge." @default.
• W2569073079 created "2017-01-13" @default.
• W2569073079 creator A5029498982 @default.
• W2569073079 creator A5040200812 @default.
• W2569073079 creator A5057603989 @default.
• W2569073079 creator A5074700329 @default.
• W2569073079 creator A5087188888 @default.
• W2569073079 date "2017-01-01" @default.
• W2569073079 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2569073079 title "Going digital: a narrative overview of the clinical and organisational impacts of eHealth technologies in hospital practice" @default.
• W2569073079 cites W1894697164 @default.
• W2569073079 cites W1966553178 @default.
• W2569073079 cites W1994174408 @default.
• W2569073079 cites W2002144979 @default.
• W2569073079 cites W2052843612 @default.
• W2569073079 cites W2059459859 @default.
• W2569073079 cites W2069165714 @default.
• W2569073079 cites W2073924861 @default.
• W2569073079 cites W2085829019 @default.
• W2569073079 cites W2099846354 @default.
• W2569073079 cites W2104793920 @default.
• W2569073079 cites W2135400982 @default.
• W2569073079 cites W2148482036 @default.
• W2569073079 cites W2153793912 @default.
• W2569073079 cites W2161488224 @default.
• W2569073079 cites W2164765923 @default.
• W2569073079 cites W2331417073 @default.
• W2569073079 doi "https://doi.org/10.1071/ah16233" @default.
• W2569073079 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28063462" @default.
• W2569073079 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2569073079 type Work @default.
• W2569073079 sameAs 2569073079 @default.
• W2569073079 citedByCount "69" @default.
• W2569073079 countsByYear W25690730792017 @default.
• W2569073079 countsByYear W25690730792018 @default.
• W2569073079 countsByYear W25690730792019 @default.
• W2569073079 countsByYear W25690730792020 @default.
• W2569073079 countsByYear W25690730792021 @default.
• W2569073079 countsByYear W25690730792022 @default.
• W2569073079 countsByYear W25690730792023 @default.
• W2569073079 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2569073079 hasAuthorship W2569073079A5029498982 @default.
• W2569073079 hasAuthorship W2569073079A5040200812 @default.
• W2569073079 hasAuthorship W2569073079A5057603989 @default.
• W2569073079 hasAuthorship W2569073079A5074700329 @default.
• W2569073079 hasAuthorship W2569073079A5087188888 @default.
• W2569073079 hasBestOaLocation W25690730791 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C145642194 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C195910791 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C198783460 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C202645933 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C2776354556 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C2779328685 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C2780182762 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C56666940 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C63527458 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C71405471 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConceptScore W2569073079C138816342 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConceptScore W2569073079C141071460 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConceptScore W2569073079C142724271 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConceptScore W2569073079C145642194 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConceptScore W2569073079C159110408 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConceptScore W2569073079C160735492 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConceptScore W2569073079C162324750 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConceptScore W2569073079C168563851 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConceptScore W2569073079C17744445 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConceptScore W2569073079C189708586 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConceptScore W2569073079C195910791 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConceptScore W2569073079C198783460 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConceptScore W2569073079C199360897 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConceptScore W2569073079C199539241 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConceptScore W2569073079C202645933 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConceptScore W2569073079C21547014 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConceptScore W2569073079C2776354556 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConceptScore W2569073079C2776478404 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConceptScore W2569073079C2779328685 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConceptScore W2569073079C2779473830 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConceptScore W2569073079C2780182762 @default.
• W2569073079 hasConceptScore W2569073079C41008148 @default.

• next