FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2569356925> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2569356925 endingPage "389" @default.
• W2569356925 startingPage "389" @default.
• W2569356925 abstract "A protocol for creating exceptionally low-cost 3-dimensional (3-D) maxillofacial skeletal models does not require proficiency with computer software or intensive labor. Small and less affluent centers can produce models with little loss in accuracy and clinical utility.To highlight the feasibility and methods of introducing in-house, entry-level additive manufacturing (3-D printing) technology to otolaryngologic craniofacial reconstruction and to describe its clinical applications and limitations, including a comparison with available vendor models.This case series of 6 models (3 pairs) compared cost, side-by-side anatomical model fidelity, and clinical versatility using entry-level, in-house 3-D pediatric mandible model production vs high-end, third-party vendor modeling, including a review of the literature. Comparisons were made at an urban pediatric otolaryngology practice among patients who had previously undergone pediatric craniofacial reconstruction with use of a commercially produced medical model for surgical planning. Each vendor model had been produced using computed tomographic imaging data. With the use of this same data source, in-house models were printed in polylactic acid using a commercially available printer. Data were collected from November 1 to December 30, 2015.Models created from these 2 methods of production were assessed for fidelity of surface anatomy, resilience to manipulation and plate bending, cost of production, speed of production, sterilizability, virtual surgical planning options, and alveolar nerve canal and tooth root visibility in mandibles.For the quantitative comparisons between in-house models (1 neonatal, 1 pediatric, and 1 adult model) and their commercial counterparts, the mean value of 7 independent measurements was analyzed from each of 3 model pairs. Caliper measurements from models produced through entry-level, in-house manufacturing were comparable to those taken from commercially produced counterparts, suggesting an acceptable degree of accuracy (0.54 mm; 95% CI, 0.36-0.72 mm). Fixed costs for in-house production included acquiring an entry-level printer (retail $2899) and an annual software subscription ($699 per year). After purchase of these initial assets, the printing cost for an in-house mandible was approximately $90, with 98% of that cost related to labor. Physical qualities of entry-level, in-house models such as nerve canal visibility, tooth root visibility, and sterilizability were inferior compared with commercially-produced stereolithic renderings.This low-cost method of in-house, entry-level 3-D printing of straightforward, skeletal models may suit a general otolaryngology practice that performs maxillofacial reconstruction. Although commercial modeling offers several unique features, such as sterilizable materials and advanced virtual planning, in-house modeling also produces renderings with high fidelity, which may be used as tools for education and surgical planning, including preoperative plate bending.4." @default.
• W2569356925 created "2017-01-13" @default.
• W2569356925 creator A5000591666 @default.
• W2569356925 creator A5025385214 @default.
• W2569356925 creator A5047035412 @default.
• W2569356925 date "2017-04-01" @default.
• W2569356925 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2569356925 title "Benefits and Limitations of Entry-Level 3-Dimensional Printing of Maxillofacial Skeletal Models" @default.
• W2569356925 cites W1125734774 @default.
• W2569356925 cites W1536902481 @default.
• W2569356925 cites W1778072505 @default.
• W2569356925 cites W1978786488 @default.
• W2569356925 cites W1994883245 @default.
• W2569356925 cites W2003253567 @default.
• W2569356925 cites W2033637395 @default.
• W2569356925 cites W2046380144 @default.
• W2569356925 cites W2047459256 @default.
• W2569356925 cites W2048644480 @default.
• W2569356925 cites W2060376915 @default.
• W2569356925 cites W2082005756 @default.
• W2569356925 cites W2117138091 @default.
• W2569356925 cites W2127890285 @default.
• W2569356925 cites W2239596706 @default.
• W2569356925 cites W2417757963 @default.
• W2569356925 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2016.3673" @default.
• W2569356925 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28056140" @default.
• W2569356925 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2569356925 type Work @default.
• W2569356925 sameAs 2569356925 @default.
• W2569356925 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W2569356925 countsByYear W25693569252018 @default.
• W2569356925 countsByYear W25693569252019 @default.
• W2569356925 countsByYear W25693569252020 @default.
• W2569356925 countsByYear W25693569252021 @default.
• W2569356925 countsByYear W25693569252022 @default.
• W2569356925 countsByYear W25693569252023 @default.
• W2569356925 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2569356925 hasAuthorship W2569356925A5000591666 @default.
• W2569356925 hasAuthorship W2569356925A5025385214 @default.
• W2569356925 hasAuthorship W2569356925A5047035412 @default.
• W2569356925 hasBestOaLocation W25693569251 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConcept C108516343 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConcept C176217482 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConcept C2776459999 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConcept C2777338717 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConcept C2780598303 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConcept C2781245598 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConceptScore W2569356925C105795698 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConceptScore W2569356925C108516343 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConceptScore W2569356925C118552586 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConceptScore W2569356925C127413603 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConceptScore W2569356925C141071460 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConceptScore W2569356925C144133560 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConceptScore W2569356925C162853370 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConceptScore W2569356925C176217482 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConceptScore W2569356925C19527891 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConceptScore W2569356925C21547014 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConceptScore W2569356925C2776459999 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConceptScore W2569356925C2777338717 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConceptScore W2569356925C2780598303 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConceptScore W2569356925C2781245598 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConceptScore W2569356925C33923547 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConceptScore W2569356925C41008148 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConceptScore W2569356925C71924100 @default.
• W2569356925 hasConceptScore W2569356925C76155785 @default.
• W2569356925 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2569356925 hasLocation W25693569251 @default.
• W2569356925 hasLocation W25693569252 @default.
• W2569356925 hasOpenAccess W2569356925 @default.
• W2569356925 hasPrimaryLocation W25693569251 @default.
• W2569356925 hasRelatedWork W2008397677 @default.
• W2569356925 hasRelatedWork W2116350809 @default.
• W2569356925 hasRelatedWork W2185420164 @default.
• W2569356925 hasRelatedWork W2443126739 @default.
• W2569356925 hasRelatedWork W2572930635 @default.
• W2569356925 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2569356925 hasRelatedWork W2885634953 @default.
• W2569356925 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2569356925 hasRelatedWork W4235981187 @default.
• W2569356925 hasRelatedWork W4250175386 @default.
• W2569356925 hasVolume "143" @default.
• W2569356925 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2569356925 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2569356925 magId "2569356925" @default.
• W2569356925 workType "article" @default.