FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2575762511> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2575762511 endingPage "1554284" @default.
• W2575762511 startingPage "s" @default.
• W2575762511 abstract "Introduction Motion preservation with cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) implants has consistently been shown, in numerous randomized controlled trials, to produce equivalent or superior clinical outcomes to anterior cervical decompression and fusion. There has therefore been a call to compare outcomes between different arthroplasty implants. We report the clinical outcomes, at 2-years follow-up, of a randomized controlled trial comparing two fundamentally different implants—the NUNEC Cervical Arthroplasty System (RTI Surgical, Inc., Florida, United States), is a PEEK on PEEK articulating device with inferior ball and superior trough secured by cam lock screws and the PRESTIGE LP Cervical Disc System (Medtronic, Minnesota, United States), is a titanium ceramic composite articulating device with superior ball and inferior trough secured by keels. Material and Methods A review of 52 patients with symptomatic degenerative disc disease causing cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy enrolled in this United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS) Research Ethics Committee approved study has been performed. Preoperatively patients were randomized into the two treatment groups (surgery with NUNEC Cervical Arthroplasty System or PRESTIGE LP Cervical Disc System) and blinded until after surgery. All procedures were performed by or under direct supervision of two senior surgeons at the host institution. Patient reported outcome measures (neck disability index (NDI), visual analogue scale (VAS) for arm and neck pain and hospital anxiety and depression scale) were collected preoperatively and at follow-up. Surgical time, blood loss, and complications have also been reviewed. Outcomes have been compared between groups. Results Data for 47 patients is reported (1 withdrawal due to relocation, 4 nonattendance at follow-up excluded). There were 51 NUNEC implants used (3 one level, 12 two level, 4 three level, and 3 four level) and 52 PRESTIGE LP implants used (6 one level, 12 two level, 6 three level, and 1 four level). There was no statistically significant difference in the distribution of the number of operated levels between the two implant groups and therefore analysis of data has been performed using the means for each group. There was no statistically significant difference in the preoperative outcome scores or demographics between the groups. In the NUNEC group NDI improved from 49 to 45.6, VAS neck from 7.5 to 4.7, VAS arms from 7.2 to 4, depression from 8.5 to 8.3, and anxiety from 9.2 to 8.6. In the PRESTIGE LP group NDI improved from 56 to 44, VAS neck from 7.2 to 4.5, VAS arms from 6.4 to 4.5, depression from 9.1 to 8, and anxiety from 9.5 to 9.2. There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative outcomes between the groups. There were no reoperations in either group for ASD. Conclusion There has been a call for studies comparing different CDA implants. We report the outcomes at 2 years of a randomized controlled trial comparing the NUNEC cervical arthroplasty system and the PRESTIGE LP cervical disc system. No statistically significant difference was found in outcome measures between the two implants. Further analysis is ongoing to compare the radiological outcomes, which may reflect longer term results." @default.
• W2575762511 created "2017-01-26" @default.
• W2575762511 creator A5016781101 @default.
• W2575762511 creator A5039469804 @default.
• W2575762511 creator A5063614740 @default.
• W2575762511 creator A5064954430 @default.
• W2575762511 creator A5069905270 @default.
• W2575762511 creator A5088376007 @default.
• W2575762511 date "2015-05-01" @default.
• W2575762511 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2575762511 title "Randomized Controlled Trial between Two Different Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Implants: Two Year Follow-Up" @default.
• W2575762511 doi "https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1554284" @default.
• W2575762511 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2575762511 type Work @default.
• W2575762511 sameAs 2575762511 @default.
• W2575762511 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2575762511 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2575762511 hasAuthorship W2575762511A5016781101 @default.
• W2575762511 hasAuthorship W2575762511A5039469804 @default.
• W2575762511 hasAuthorship W2575762511A5063614740 @default.
• W2575762511 hasAuthorship W2575762511A5064954430 @default.
• W2575762511 hasAuthorship W2575762511A5069905270 @default.
• W2575762511 hasAuthorship W2575762511A5088376007 @default.
• W2575762511 hasBestOaLocation W25757625111 @default.
• W2575762511 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2575762511 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2575762511 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2575762511 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2575762511 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2575762511 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W2575762511 hasConcept C2781038967 @default.
• W2575762511 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2575762511 hasConceptScore W2575762511C141071460 @default.
• W2575762511 hasConceptScore W2575762511C14184104 @default.
• W2575762511 hasConceptScore W2575762511C142724271 @default.
• W2575762511 hasConceptScore W2575762511C168563851 @default.
• W2575762511 hasConceptScore W2575762511C204787440 @default.
• W2575762511 hasConceptScore W2575762511C2778336525 @default.
• W2575762511 hasConceptScore W2575762511C2781038967 @default.
• W2575762511 hasConceptScore W2575762511C71924100 @default.
• W2575762511 hasIssue "1_suppl" @default.
• W2575762511 hasLocation W25757625111 @default.
• W2575762511 hasOpenAccess W2575762511 @default.
• W2575762511 hasPrimaryLocation W25757625111 @default.
• W2575762511 hasRelatedWork W2155748906 @default.
• W2575762511 hasRelatedWork W2327856340 @default.
• W2575762511 hasRelatedWork W2559760157 @default.
• W2575762511 hasRelatedWork W2894316109 @default.
• W2575762511 hasRelatedWork W2971548207 @default.
• W2575762511 hasRelatedWork W3031634678 @default.
• W2575762511 hasRelatedWork W3046231149 @default.
• W2575762511 hasRelatedWork W3100491316 @default.
• W2575762511 hasRelatedWork W3180894958 @default.
• W2575762511 hasRelatedWork W4283523205 @default.
• W2575762511 hasVolume "5" @default.
• W2575762511 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2575762511 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2575762511 magId "2575762511" @default.
• W2575762511 workType "article" @default.