Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2577541> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 54 of
54
with 100 items per page.
- W2577541 endingPage "50" @default.
- W2577541 startingPage "50" @default.
- W2577541 abstract "In the field of law the principal problem concerning handwriting is the recognition or identification of samples of handwriting submitted as evidence. In decided contrast to the subjective analyses of graphologists are the objective investigations by examiners of documents. Representative of the experts in the field is Albert S. Osborn who has introduced many techniques and refinements into the study of writing.1 However, there apparently have been only two published reports of experimental studies of the identification of handwriting samples by non-experts. In one of these studies Inbau proposed to test the accuracy of identification of disputed handwriting by lay witnesses, since such a practice is well established in the courts.2 The signatures of each of seven members of the law faculty of Northwestern University were obtained; and a spurious signature (made without any attempt at imitation), a free-hand forgery and a traced forgery were prepared for each signature on cards similar to those on which the genuine signatures had been written. Five groups of witnesses were asked to give opinions on the genuineness of the seven sets of cards. Only the first two groups consisting of the seven professors and five secretaries were acquainted with the signatures of the professors whose sample signatures were obtained. The third group was designated as the lay group, the fourth group consisted of seven bank employees whose work brought them in constant contact with signatures, and the fifth group was composed of three expert handwriting examiners. Because these three groups were not acquainted with the signatures of the professors, they identified the names on the basis of their own visual comparisons between the four questioned signatures and a set of standard (genuine) signatures. The actual testing of each of the seven faculty members and the secretaries was done individually; the cards were viewed one at a time, an opinion as to genuineness obtained, the card removed from view, the next card presented, an opinion obtained, and so on, until the entire series of seven sets of four cards each had been presented and opinions obtained. This procedure simulated courtroom conditions in which juxtaposition comparisons are absent, and only comparisons based upon the subject's recollection of the genuine writing are allowed." @default.
- W2577541 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2577541 creator A5086612256 @default.
- W2577541 creator A5090444567 @default.
- W2577541 date "1943-05-01" @default.
- W2577541 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W2577541 title "The Identification of One's Own Handwriting" @default.
- W2577541 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/1137192" @default.
- W2577541 hasPublicationYear "1943" @default.
- W2577541 type Work @default.
- W2577541 sameAs 2577541 @default.
- W2577541 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W2577541 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2577541 hasAuthorship W2577541A5086612256 @default.
- W2577541 hasAuthorship W2577541A5090444567 @default.
- W2577541 hasBestOaLocation W25775412 @default.
- W2577541 hasConcept C116834253 @default.
- W2577541 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W2577541 hasConcept C204321447 @default.
- W2577541 hasConcept C2779386606 @default.
- W2577541 hasConcept C28490314 @default.
- W2577541 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2577541 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
- W2577541 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2577541 hasConceptScore W2577541C116834253 @default.
- W2577541 hasConceptScore W2577541C154945302 @default.
- W2577541 hasConceptScore W2577541C204321447 @default.
- W2577541 hasConceptScore W2577541C2779386606 @default.
- W2577541 hasConceptScore W2577541C28490314 @default.
- W2577541 hasConceptScore W2577541C41008148 @default.
- W2577541 hasConceptScore W2577541C59822182 @default.
- W2577541 hasConceptScore W2577541C86803240 @default.
- W2577541 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2577541 hasLocation W25775411 @default.
- W2577541 hasLocation W25775412 @default.
- W2577541 hasOpenAccess W2577541 @default.
- W2577541 hasPrimaryLocation W25775411 @default.
- W2577541 hasRelatedWork W2014802492 @default.
- W2577541 hasRelatedWork W2146962865 @default.
- W2577541 hasRelatedWork W2348811867 @default.
- W2577541 hasRelatedWork W2349400621 @default.
- W2577541 hasRelatedWork W2351628893 @default.
- W2577541 hasRelatedWork W2377144691 @default.
- W2577541 hasRelatedWork W2900727477 @default.
- W2577541 hasRelatedWork W2990130290 @default.
- W2577541 hasRelatedWork W3010738411 @default.
- W2577541 hasRelatedWork W3107474891 @default.
- W2577541 hasVolume "34" @default.
- W2577541 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2577541 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2577541 magId "2577541" @default.
- W2577541 workType "article" @default.